Quantifying effects of grassland management on enteric methane emission
A. Bannink A D , D. Warner B C , B. Hatew C , J. L. Ellis C and J. Dijkstra CA Animal Nutrition, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
B Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, J1M 0C8 Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
C Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
D Corresponding author. Email: andre.bannink@wur.nl
Animal Production Science 56(3) 409-416 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15594
Submitted: 15 September 2015 Accepted: 2 December 2015 Published: 9 February 2016
Abstract
Data on the effect of grassland management on the nutritional characteristics of fresh and conserved grass, and on enteric methane (CH4) emission in dairy cattle, are sparse. In the present study, an extant mechanistic model of enteric fermentation was evaluated against observations on the effect of grassland management on CH4 emission in three trials conducted in climate-controlled respiration chambers. Treatments were nitrogen fertilisation rate, stage of maturity of grass and level of feed intake, and mean data of a total of 18 treatments were used (4 grass herbage treatments and 14 grass silage treatments). There was a wide range of observed organic matter (OM) digestibility (from 68% to 84%) and CH4 emission intensity (from 5.6% to 7.3% of gross energy intake; from 27.4 to 36.9 g CH4/kg digested OM; from 19.7 to 24.6 g CH4/kg dry matter) among treatment means. The model predicted crude protein, fibre and OM digestibility with reasonable accuracy (root of mean square prediction errors as % of observed mean, RMSPE, 6.8%, 7.5% and 3.9%, respectively). For grass silages only, the model-predicted CH4 correlated well (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.73) with the observed CH4 (which varied from 5.7% to 7.2% of gross energy intake), after predicted CH4 was corrected for nitrate consumed with grass silage, acting as hydrogen sink in the rumen. After nitrate correction, there was a systematic under-prediction of 18%, which reduced to 9% when correcting the erroneously predicted rumen volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile (RMSPE 15%). Although a small over-prediction of 3% was obtained for the grass herbages, this increased to 14% when correcting VFA profile. The model predictions showed a systematic difference in CH4 emission from grass herbages and grass silages, which was not supported by the observed data. This is possibly related to the very high content of soluble carbohydrates in grass herbage (an extra 170 g/kg dry matter compared with grass silages) and an erroneous prediction of its fate and contribution to CH4 in the rumen. Erroneous prediction of the VFA profile is likely to be due to different types of diets included in the empirical database used to parameterise VFA yield in the model from those evaluated here. Model representations of feed digestion and VFA profile are key elements to predict enteric CH4 accurately, and with further evaluations, the latter aspect should be emphasised in particular.
Additional keywords: dairy cow, grass roughage, modelling, rumen fermentation.
References
Bannink A, Kogut J, Dijkstra J, France J, Kebreab E, Van Vuuren AM, Tamminga S (2006) Estimation of the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid production in the rumen of lactating cows. Journal of Theoretical Biology 238, 36–51.| Estimation of the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid production in the rumen of lactating cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1Oms7jN&md5=019d270ee843340a20c12d4a152849d1CAS | 16111711PubMed |
Bannink A, France J, López S, Gerrits WJJ, Kebreab E, Tamminga S, Dijkstra J (2008) Modelling the implication of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall. Animal Feed Science and Technology 143, 3–26.
| Modelling the implication of feeding strategy on rumen fermentation and functioning of the rumen wall.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bannink A, Smits MCJ, Kebreab E, Mills JAN, Ellis JL, Klop A, France J, Dijkstra J (2010) Simulating the effects of grassland management and grass ensiling on methane emission from lactating cows. The Journal of Agricultural Science 148, 55–72.
| Simulating the effects of grassland management and grass ensiling on methane emission from lactating cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhs1Skt77K&md5=cddbe8f793ce73e49c50661a607941a7CAS |
Bannink A, Van Schijndel MW, Dijkstra J (2011) A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch national inventory report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 603–618.
| A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch national inventory report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dijkstra J, Neal HDStC, Beever DE, France J (1992) Simulation of nutrient digestion, absorption and outflow in the rumen: model description. The Journal of Nutrition 122, 2239–2256.
Dijkstra J, van Gastelen S, Antunes-Fernandes EC, Warner D, Hatew B, Klop G, Podesta SC, van Lingen HJ, Hettinga KA, Bannink A (2016) Relationships between milk fatty acid profiles and enteric methane production in dairy cattle fed grass- or grass silage-based diets. Animal Production Science 56, 541–548.
| Relationships between milk fatty acid profiles and enteric methane production in dairy cattle fed grass- or grass silage-based diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis JL, Bannink A, France J, Kebreab E, Dijkstra J (2010) Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models. Global Change Biology 16, 3246–3256.
| Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis JL, Dijkstra J, France J, Parsons AJ, Edwards GR, Rasmussen S, Kebreab E, Bannink A (2012) Effect of high-sugar grasses on methane emissions simulated using a dynamic model. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 272–285.
| Effect of high-sugar grasses on methane emissions simulated using a dynamic model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs1OlsrjK&md5=90a698d519c12f9810a83fb6f8645601CAS | 22192207PubMed |
Hammond KJ, Muetzel S, Waghorn GC, Pinares-Patino CS, Burke JL, Hoskin SO (2009) The variation in methane emissions from sheep and cattle is not explained by the chemical composition of ryegrass. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 69, 174–178.
Heeren JAH, Podesta SC, Hatew B, Klop G, van Laar H, Bannink A, Warner D, de Jonge LH, Dijkstra J (2014) Rumen degradation characteristics of ryegrass herbage and ryegrass silage are affected by interactions between stage of maturity and nitrogen fertilization level. Animal Production Science 54, 1263–1267.
| Rumen degradation characteristics of ryegrass herbage and ryegrass silage are affected by interactions between stage of maturity and nitrogen fertilization level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtlaktLnI&md5=7540cd9d546e6b9daa47403a35c69d0dCAS |
Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HPS, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Tricarico JM (2013) Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5045–5069.
| Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslKktrrL&md5=0cfa1e01345e20be5c9e6a663f7d8040CAS | 24045497PubMed |
IPCC (1997) ‘Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for National greenhouse gas inventories.’ (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Bracknell, UK)
Klop G, Hatew B, Bannink A, Dijkstra J (2015) Feeding nitrate and docosahexaenoic acid affects enteric methane production and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science
| Feeding nitrate and docosahexaenoic acid affects enteric methane production and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26627858PubMed |
Mills JAN, Dijkstra J, Bannink A, Cammell SB, Kebreab E, France J (2001) A mechanistic model of whole-tract digestion and methanogenesis in the lactating dairy cow: model development, evaluation, and application. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1584–1597.
Morvay Y, Bannink A, France J, Kebreab E, Dijkstra J (2011) Evaluation of models to predict the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid profiles in rumen fluid of lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3063–3080.
| Evaluation of models to predict the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid profiles in rumen fluid of lactating Holstein cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXnvFCgu7c%3D&md5=67dfdcef20d1d7eccedaabd59c1d3fd2CAS | 21605776PubMed |
Warner D, Podesta SC, Hatew B, Klop G, van Laar H, Bannink A, Dijkstra J (2015) Effect of nitrogen fertilization rate and regrowth interval of grass herbage on methane emission of zero-grazing lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 3383–3393.
| Effect of nitrogen fertilization rate and regrowth interval of grass herbage on methane emission of zero-grazing lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXktlSrsb0%3D&md5=b5aa9fef718cc808bf34762a046c949dCAS | 25771062PubMed |
Warner D, Hatew B, Podesta SC, Klop G, van Gastelen S, van Laar H, Dijkstra J, Bannink A (2016) Effects of nitrogen fertilisation rate and maturity of grass silage on methane emission by lactating dairy cows. Animal 10, 34–43.
| Effects of nitrogen fertilisation rate and maturity of grass silage on methane emission by lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXitVKjsbzO&md5=dca3cdca8c290e73eeb3281f658eb495CAS | 26264354PubMed |
