Carbon-neutral wool farming in south-eastern Australia
Natalie A. Doran-Browne A D , John Ive B , Phillip Graham C and Richard J. Eckard AA Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B Talaheni, PO Box 337, Hall, ACT 2618, Australia.
C NSW Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 10, Yass, NSW 2582, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: n.doran-browne@unimelb.edu.au
Animal Production Science 56(3) 417-422 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15541
Submitted: 15 September 2015 Accepted: 5 December 2015 Published: 9 February 2016
Abstract
Ruminant livestock production generates higher levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) compared with other types of farming. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce or offset those emissions where possible. Although mitigation options exist that reduce ruminant GHGE through the use of feed management, flock structure or breeding management, these options only reduce the existing emissions by up to 30% whereas planting trees and subsequent carbon sequestration in trees and soil has the potential for livestock emissions to be offset in their entirety. Trees can introduce additional co-benefits that may increase production such as reduced salinity and therefore increased pasture production, shelter for animals or reduced erosion. Trees will also use more water and compete with pastures for water and light. Therefore, careful planning is required to locate trees where the co-benefits can be maximised instead of any negative trade-offs. This study analysed the carbon balance of a wool case study farm, Talaheni, in south-eastern Australia to determine if the farm was carbon neutral. The Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory was used to calculate GHGE and carbon stocks, with national emissions factors used where available, and otherwise figures from the IPCC methodology being used. Sources of GHGE were from livestock, energy and fuel, and carbon stocks were present in the trees and soil. The results showed that from when the farm was purchased in 1980–2012 the farm had sequestered 11 times more carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) in trees and soil than was produced by livestock and energy. Between 1980 and 2012 a total of 31 100 t CO2e were sequestered with 19 300 and 11 800 t CO2e in trees and soil, respectively, whereas farm emissions totalled 2800 t CO2e. There was a sufficient increase in soil carbon stocks alone to offset all GHGE at the study site. This study demonstrated that there are substantial gains to be made in soil carbon stocks where initial soils are eroded and degraded and there is the opportunity to increase soil carbon either through planting trees or introducing perennial pastures to store more carbon under pastures. Further research would be beneficial on the carbon-neutral potential of farms in more fertile, high-rainfall areas. These areas typically have higher stocking rates than the present study and would require higher levels of carbon stocks for the farm to be carbon neutral.
Additional keywords: climate, greenhouse gases, policy, resource management, sheep.
References
Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agroforestry Systems 61–62, 65–78.| Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Browne NA, Eckard RJ, Behrendt R, Kingwell RS (2011) A comparative analysis of on-farm greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural enterprises in south eastern Australia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 641–652.
| A comparative analysis of on-farm greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural enterprises in south eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Browne NA, Behrendt R, Kingwell RS, Eckard RJ (2015) Does producing more product over a lifetime reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase profitability in dairy and wool enterprises? Animal Production Science 55, 49–55.
| Does producing more product over a lifetime reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase profitability in dairy and wool enterprises?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitVKqsrrL&md5=b291b49e76e921e0fcc66ed05d5701feCAS |
Casey JW, Holden NM (2005) Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agricultural Systems 86, 97–114.
| Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CER (2015a) Auction – November 2015. Available at http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Auctions-results/November-2015 [Verified 2 December 2015]
CER (2015b) Eligibility, additionality and newness. Available at http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/Want-to-participate-in-the-Emissions-Reduction-Fund/Planning-a-project/Eligibility-additionality-and-newness#The-newness-requirement [Verified 21 August 2015]
Christie KM, Rawnsley RP, Eckard RJ (2011) A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 653–662.
| A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clark SG, Donnelly JR, Moore AD (2000) The GrassGro decision support tool: its effectiveness in simulating pasture and animal production and value in determining research priorities. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 247–256.
| The GrassGro decision support tool: its effectiveness in simulating pasture and animal production and value in determining research priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Commonwealth of Australia (2014) Emissions Reduction Fund White Paper. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Conant RT, Paustian K (2002) Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16, 90.1–90.9.
| Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crossman ND, Bryan BA, Summers DM (2011) Carbon payments and low-cost conservation. Pagos de Carbono y Conservación de Bajo Costo. Conservation Biology 25, 835–845.
| Carbon payments and low-cost conservation. Pagos de Carbono y Conservación de Bajo Costo.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21507060PubMed |
DCCEE (2012) ‘An overview of the Carbon Farming Initiative.’ (Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency: Canberra, ACT)
DIICCSRTE (2013) ‘National Inventory Report 2011, Vol. 1, Australian National Greenhouse Accounts.’ (Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education: Canberra, ACT)
Evans MC, Carwardine J, Fensham RJ, Butler DW, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, Martin TG (2015) Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Environmental Science & Policy 50, 114–129.
| Carbon farming via assisted natural regeneration as a cost-effective mechanism for restoring biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXjtFGhtro%3D&md5=bfa6218380c1bcca2987f57d73a6d1f3CAS |
Fanning P (1994) Long-term contemporary erosion rates in an arid rangelands environment in western New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Arid Environments 28, 173–187.
| Long-term contemporary erosion rates in an arid rangelands environment in western New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. 2. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
| GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. 2. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garnett T (2009) Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science & Policy 12, 491–503.
| Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmslCitLY%3D&md5=ab84850261ca2159c3bafd36220c1118CAS |
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) ‘Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations:, Rome, Italy)
Harper RJ, Beck AC, Ritson P, Hill MJ, Mitchell CD, Barrett DJ, Smettem KRJ, Mann SS (2007) The potential of greenhouse sinks to underwrite improved land management. Ecological Engineering 29, 329–341.
| The potential of greenhouse sinks to underwrite improved land management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IPCC (2006) ‘2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.’ Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. (Eds S Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan)
Ive J, Ive R (2007) Achieving production and environmental benefits in a challenging landscape. In ‘Pasture systems: managing for a variable climate. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Grassland Society of NSW, Queanbeyan, NSW’. (Eds D Garden, H Dove, T Bolger) pp. 26–33. (Grassland Society of NSW Inc.: Orange, NSW)
John M, Pannell D, Kingwell R (2005) Climate change and the economics of farm management in the face of land degradation: dryland salinity in Western Australia. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie 53, 443–459.
| Climate change and the economics of farm management in the face of land degradation: dryland salinity in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kaeser A, Sereke F, Dux D, Herzog F (2011) Agroforestry in Switzerland. Agrarforschung Schweiz 2, 128–133.
Lin BB, Macfadyen S, Renwick AR, Cunningham SA, Schellhorn NA (2013) Maximizing the environmental benefits of carbon farming through ecosystem service delivery. Bioscience 63, 793–803.
| Maximizing the environmental benefits of carbon farming through ecosystem service delivery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maraseni TN, Cockfield G (2015) The financial implications of converting farmland to state-supported environmental plantings in the Darling Downs region, Queensland. Agricultural Systems 135, 57–65.
| The financial implications of converting farmland to state-supported environmental plantings in the Darling Downs region, Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paul KI, Reeson A, Polglase P, Crossman N, Freudenberger D, Hawkins C (2013) Economic and employment implications of a carbon market for integrated farm forestry and biodiverse environmental plantings. Land Use Policy 30, 496–506.
| Economic and employment implications of a carbon market for integrated farm forestry and biodiverse environmental plantings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Polglase PJ, Reeson A, Hawkins CS, Paul KI, Siggins AW, Turner J, Crawford DF, Jovanovic T, Hobbs TJ, Opie K, Carwardine J, Almeida A (2013) Potential for forest carbon plantings to offset greenhouse emissions in Australia: economics and constraints to implementation. Climatic Change 121, 161–175.
| Potential for forest carbon plantings to offset greenhouse emissions in Australia: economics and constraints to implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pretty J, Sutherland WJ, Ashby J, Auburn J, Baulcombe D, Bell M, Bentley J, Bickersteth S, Brown K, Burke J, Campbell H, Chen K, Crowley E, Crute I, Dobbelaere D, Edwards-Jones G, Funes-Monzote F, Godfray HCJ, Griffon M, Gypmantisiri P, Haddad L, Halavatau S, Herren H, Holderness M, Izac AM, Jones M, Koohafkan P, Lal R, Lang T, McNeely J, Mueller A, Nisbett N, Noble A, Pingali P, Pinto Y, Rabbinge R, Ravindranath NH, Rola A, Roling N, Sage C, Settle W, Sha JM, Luo SM, Simons T, Smith P, Strzepeck K, Swaine H, Terry E, Tomich TP, Toulmin C, Trigo E, Twomlow S, Vis JK, Wilson J, Pilgrim S (2010) The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8, 219–236.
| The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reeson A, Rudd L, Zhu Z (2015) Management flexibility, price uncertainty and the adoption of carbon forestry. Land Use Policy 46, 267–272.
| Management flexibility, price uncertainty and the adoption of carbon forestry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rengasamy P (2002) Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 351–361.
| Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richards GP, Evans DMW (2004) Development of a carbon accounting model (FullCAM Version 1.0) for the Australian continent. Australian Forestry 67, 277–283.
| Development of a carbon accounting model (FullCAM Version 1.0) for the Australian continent.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schoeneberger MM (2009) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforestry Systems 75, 27–37.
| Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O (2007) Agriculture. In ‘Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. (Eds B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, R Dave, LA Meyer) pp. 497–540. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY)
Thomassin PJ (2003) Canadian agriculture and the development of a carbon trading and offset system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, 1171–1177.
| Canadian agriculture and the development of a carbon trading and offset system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
