Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using Australian Sheep Breeding Values to increase lean meat yield percentage

G. E. Gardner A B G , A. Williams A B , J. Siddell A D , A. J. Ball C , S. Mortimer A D , R. H. Jacob A E , K. L. Pearce A B , J. E. Hocking Edwards F , J. B. Rowe A and D. W. Pethick A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Sheep Industry Innovation, CJ Hawkins Homestead, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

B School of Veterinary and Biomedical Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

C Meat and Livestock Australia, CJ Hawkins Homestead Building, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Industry & Investment NSW Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia.

E Department of Agriculture WA, Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.

F South Australian Research and Development Institute, Naracoorte, SA 5271, Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: g.gardner@murdoch.edu.au

Animal Production Science 50(12) 1098-1106 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10144
Submitted: 10 August 2010  Accepted: 18 October 2010   Published: 23 November 2010

Abstract

This study describes the impact of Australian Sheep Breeding Values (ASBV) for post-weaning weight (PWWT), C-site fatness (PFAT) and eye muscle depth (PEMD) on lamb carcasses within the Australian Sheep Industry CRC Information Nucleus Flock. These results are taken from the 2007 drop progeny, consisting of ~2000 lambs slaughtered at a target weight of 21.5 kg. These lambs were the progeny of sires selected to ensure genetic diversity across various production traits. As expected, the PWWT ASBV increased weight at slaughter, and hot standard carcass weight. Dressing percentage was markedly improved by increasing PEMD ASBV, thus prime lamb producers will be maintaining an animal of similar weight on farm, but delivering a markedly larger carcass at slaughter. Lean meat yield % (LMY%) was highest in the progeny of sires with low PFAT ASBV, which decreased whole carcass fatness and increased muscularity. PWWT ASBV affected carcass composition but had little impact on LMY%, as the decreased fatness was largely offset by increased bone, with relatively little change in muscle content. Lastly, PEMD ASBV had little impact on whole carcass LMY%, but did appear to cause some level of muscle redistribution to the higher value loin cuts, in turn increasing the value of the carcass lean.

Additional keywords: lamb meat.


References

Anon. (1992) ‘AUS-MEAT language.’ (AUS-MEAT: Sydney)

Banks RG (2002) Enhancing the value of meat from wool sheep: is there a need for specialization? International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 50, 584–595.

Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser H-U, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RB (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.

Butterfield R (1988) ‘New concepts of sheep growth.’ (University of Sydney: Sydney)

Fogarty NM, Banks RG, van der Werf JHJ, Ball AJ, Gibson JP (2007) The information nucleus – a new concept to enhance sheep industry genetic improvement. In ‘Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics’. pp. 29–32. (Curran Associates: Redhook, NY)

Greeff JC, Safari E, Fogarty NM, Brien FD, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, van der Werf JHJ (2008) Genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits and their relationships to liveweight and wool production in hogget Merino rams. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 205–215.
Genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits and their relationships to liveweight and wool production in hogget Merino rams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czhslejtg%3D%3D&md5=23db9bca08e5c28faa11a54b7cc7c42cCAS | 18479272PubMed |

Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB (1987) The efficiency of systematic sampling in sterology and its prediction. Journal of Microscopy 147, 229–263.

Gundersen HJG, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Møller A, et al (1988) Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 96, 379–394.
Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3ktVOjsQ%3D%3D&md5=27edc29dd5ea3cd2da8a8ed814b03013CAS | 3288247PubMed |

Hall DG, Gilmour AR, Fogarty NM, Holst PJ (2002) Growth and carcase composition of second-cross lambs. 2. Relationship between estimated breeding values of sires and their progeny performance under fast and slow growth regimes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1341–1348.
Growth and carcase composition of second-cross lambs. 2. Relationship between estimated breeding values of sires and their progeny performance under fast and slow growth regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hegarty RS, Hopkins DL, Farrell T, Banks R, Harden S (2006) Effects of available nutrition on the growth and muscling potential of sires on the development of crossbred lambs: 2. Composition and commercial yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 617–626.
Effects of available nutrition on the growth and muscling potential of sires on the development of crossbred lambs: 2. Composition and commercial yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hopkins DL, Hegarty RS, Farrell TC (2005) Relationships between sire estimated breeding values and the meat and eating quality of meat from their progeny grown on two planes of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 525–533.

Huisman AE, Brown DJ (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between bodyweight traits and other traits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1186–1193.
Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between bodyweight traits and other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones HE, Simm G, Young RM (2002) The use of X-ray computer tomography for measuring the muscularity of live sheep. Animal Science 75, 387–399.

Laville E, Boiux J, Sayd T (2004) Effects of a quantitative trait locus for muscle hypertrophy from Belgium Texel on sheep carcass conformation and muscularity. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3128–3137.

Mortimer SI, van der Werf JHJ, Jacob RH, Pethick DW, Pearce KL, Warner RD, Geesink GH, Hocking Edwards JE, Gardner GE, Ponnampalam EN, Kitessa SM, Ball AJ, Hopkins DL (2010) Preliminary estimates of genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in Australian sheep. Animal Production Science 50, 1135–1144.
Preliminary estimates of genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in Australian sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mull RT (1984) Mass estimates by computed tomography: physical density from CT numbers. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 143, 1101–1104.

Perry D, Shorthose WR, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM (2001) Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 953–957.
Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pethick DW, Hopkins DL, D’Souza DN, Thompson JM, Walker PJ (2005) Effects of animal age on the eating quality of sheep meat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 491–498.
Effects of animal age on the eating quality of sheep meat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pethick DW, Banks RG, Hales J, Ross IR (2006) Australian prime lamb – a vision for 2020. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 66–73.

Rymill SR, Thompson JM, Ferguson DM (1997) The effect of intramuscular fat percentage on the sensory evaluation of beef cooked by different methods to two degrees of doneness. In ‘Proceedings of the 43rd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology’. Auckland, New Zealand. pp. 212–213.

Shorthose WR, Harris PV (1991) Effects of growth and composition on meat quality. Advances in Meat Science 7, 515–549.

Thompson JM (2004) The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 645–652.
The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson JM, Hopkins DL, D’Souza DM, Walker PJ, Baud SR, Pethick DW (2005a) The impact of processing on sensory and objective measures of sheep meat eating quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 561–573.
The impact of processing on sensory and objective measures of sheep meat eating quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson JM, Pleasants AB, Pethick DW (2005b) Sheep meat eating quality: the effect of demographic factors on consumer sensory scores. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 477–482.
Sheep meat eating quality: the effect of demographic factors on consumer sensory scores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Trezona-Murray M (2008) Conventional and deep litter pig production systems: The effects on fat deposition and distribution in growing female large white X landrace pigs. PhD Thesis, Murdoch University.

Warner RD, Jacob RH, Hocking Edwards JE, McDonagh M, Pearce K, Geesink G, Kearney G, Allingham P, Kearney G, Pethick DW (2010) Quality of lamb meat from the Information Nucleus Flock. Animal Production Science 50, 1123–1134.
Quality of lamb meat from the Information Nucleus Flock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |