Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effective remediation of diazinon from spent sheep dip wash by disposal on land

G. W. Levot
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, PMB 8, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia. Email: garry.levot@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(1) 13-16 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05361
Submitted: 24 December 2005  Accepted: 7 June 2006   Published: 2 January 2007

Abstract

Spent sheep dip wash (about 3500 L) containing 59 mg diazinon/L was evenly distributed onto a 450-m2 grassed, soil-bunded, sloping site near Cumnock in central New South Wales, Australia. The entire volume was contained within the bunded area but surface run-off created ponding in the lowest corner of the site. The mean concentration within the top 7 cm of soil was 2.32 mg/kg a day after application. By day 14, this had dropped to 0.4 mg/kg and by day 56, was below the limit of quantification (0.1 mg/kg). The half-life of diazinon in soil was estimated to be 7 days. Residues in the next 7 cm of soil depth were much lower and were below the limit of quantification in all samples collected at day 28 or later. This suggests that vertical leaching of diazinon within the soil profile did not occur despite more than 95 mm of rain during the trial interval. Throughout the 56-day trial interval, diazinon concentrations in the top 7 cm of soil 3 m downhill of the lowest corner of the dip disposal site were unchanged from background pre-treatment levels. No diazinon was detected in samples at 7–14 cm depth in the soil profile in this area. With neither vertical nor lateral movement of diazinon away from the initial treatment zone, we consider the disposal of spent diazinon sheep dips as described here, to be an acceptable and convenient option for Australian wool producers and dipping contractors. Suitable dip disposal sites should be situated away from sensitive locations in areas that have good grass cover over deep soil and that are contained by an effective bund. Stock and other animals should be excluded from these sensitive locations.


Acknowledgements

I thank Mr Phillip King of King’s Livestock Services and the NSW Livestock Contractors’ Association for his cooperation with this work, Mr Robert Lee, ‘Coorah’ Cumnock for allowing me to conduct this work on his property, Dr Idris Barchia for the statistical analysis, Mr Roy Lawrie, Soil Chemist, for advice and assistance in identifying the trial site, soil type and density and Dr Lukas Van Zweiten for reviewing an earlier draft of this paper. The study described in this paper was funded by Australian woolgrowers and the Australian Government through Australian Wool Innovation Limited.


References


Aiken MN, Tiley GED, Sym G, Dickson JI, Elrick G (2004) Persistence, mobility and pollution risks of sheep dip (diazinon and cypermethrin) when applied to grassland. In ‘Proceedings of the 20th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation’. pp. 328–330.

Arienzo M, Sanchez-Camazano M, Cristano Herrero T, Sanchez-Martin MJ (1993) Effect of organic cosolvents on adsorption of organophosphorus pesticides by soils. Chemosphere 27, 1409–1417.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 3 August 2006)