Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA03015
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 44(12)

Plant density and thinning regime effect on maize (Zea mays) grain and fodder yield

E. M. Njoka A B , M. M. Muraya A and M. Okumu A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Egerton University, Department of Agronomy, PO Box 536, Njoro, Kenya.

B Corresponding author. Email: emnjoka@yahoo.com; mahugu2002@yahoo.com

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44(12) 1215-1219 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03015
Submitted: 7 January 2003  Accepted: 26 February 2004   Published: 24 January 2005

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) plant density is an important management practice for successful grain and forage production. The objective of this study was to determine the most suitable maize seeding and time of thinning maize as fodder in grain maize crops. Previously the focus in this area has been on grain and silage production, and consequently information on the production of fodder in grain maize crops is limited. This study therefore aims to investigate the growth of high density maize for fodder production through thinning and subsequent grain yield. A plant density experiment in randomised complete block design was carried out at Egerton University, Njoro, using a Kenyan hybrid (H511) where 4 densities (44 444, 88 888, 177 777 and 355 555 plants/ha) and 4 thinning regimes (V4, V6, V10 and VT phenological stages) were used. The densities vary through number of seed per hill (i.e. 1, 2, 4 and 8 seeds/hill, not row or plant spacing) and spacing of 30 cm between the hills within the row and 75 cm between the rows was used. Maize plants were thinned following the appropriate thinning regime to leave 1 plant per hill, giving a plant density of 44 444 plants/ha in all treatments after thinning. Their biomass was then determined. The single plants per hill left, as a normal farmers practice, were used to determine grain yield at harvest. Plant density of 355 552 plants/ha, with a treatment structure of 4 seeds/hill and thinned at the VT phenological stage gave the highest thinning biomass per hectare, while 44 444 plants/ha, with a treatment structure of 1 seed/hill and no thinning, gave the highest grain yield. The thinning regime of the V10 phenological stage and 2 seeds/hill thinned at the VT phenological stage gave appreciable amount of fodder and grain yields. This study has shown that with particular seeding densities and thinning regimes, production of both fodder and grain is possible.


References


Bangarwa AS, Kairon MS, Singh KP (1988) Effect of plant density and level and proportion of nitrogen fertilization on growth yield and yield components of winter maize (Zea may L.). Indian Journal of Agriculture Science 58, 854–856. open url image1

Carter PR, Coor JG, Undersander D, Albrecht KA, Shaver R (1991) Corn hybrids for silage: an update. In ‘Proceedings of the 46th Chicago annual corn and sorghum resources conference’. (Ed. D Wilkison) pp. 141–164. (America Seed Trade Association: Washington DC)

CIMMYT (1975) Report on maize improvement 1975. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, El Batan, Mexico.

Cox WJ, Otis DJ (1993) Grain and silage yield resources of commercial corn hybrids to plant densities. In ‘Agronomy abstracts’. p. 132. (USA MADros. Inf. Serv.ON: Wisconsin)

Cuomo GJ, Redfearn DD, Blouin DC (1998) Plant density effects on tropical corn forage mass, morphology, and nutritive value. Agronomy Journal 90, 93–96. open url image1

Cusicanqui JA, Lauer JG (1999) Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agronomy Journal 91, 91–915. open url image1

Karlen DL, Camp CR, Zublena JP (1985) Plant density, distribution, and fertilizer effects on yield and quality of irrigated corn silage. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 16, 55–70. open url image1

Kimurto PK (2000) Selection of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties for marginal areas of Kenya by stimulating drought stress. MSc Thesis, Egerton University, Kenya.

Loomis RS, Connor DJ (1992) ‘Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)

Njoka EM, Mackenzi PM (1996) Indigenous innovations for agriculture in semi-arid lands of Nakuru, Kenya. In ‘Proceedings of the 1st East and Central Africa dryland farming conference’. (Eds EM Njoka, MG Kinyua, RW Mwanji) pp. 192–203. (Egerton University: Kenya)

Phipps RH, Weller RF (1979) The development of plant components and their effects on the composition of the fresh and ensiled forage maize. I. The accumulation of DM, chemical composition and nutritive value of fresh maize. Agriculture Science Journal 92, 417–483. open url image1

Pinter L, Alfold Z, Burus Z, Paldi E (1994) Feed value of forage maize hybrids varying in tolerance to plant density. Agronomy Journal 86, 799–804. open url image1

Prine GM (1971) A critical period for ear development in maize. Crop Science Journal 11, 782–786. open url image1

Rahman MM, Islam MR, Islam M (1993) Effect of sowing methods and seed rates on production parameter and average chemical composition of fodder maize cultivar SAVAR-1. Asian–Australian Journal of Animal Sciences 6, 123–126. open url image1

Roth G, Undersander D, Allen M, Ford S, Harrison J, Hunt C (1995) ‘Corn silage production, management, and feeding.’ (NCR 574: Madison, WI)

Rutger JN, Crowder LV (1967) Effect of population and row width on corn silage yields. Agronomy Journal 59, 475–476. open url image1

Sparks TH (1988) An examination of the effect of plant population on dry matter yield in U.K. Variety trials of forage maize. Plant Variety Seeds 1, 147–151. open url image1

Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) ‘Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrics approach.’ 2nd edn. (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company: New York)