Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of feeding volumes on performance and bone characteristics of Embrapa 051 laying hens housed in a cage-free system

Juliana Forgiarini A , Everton Luis Krabbe B * , Débora Aline Alves A , Valdir Silveira de Ávila B , Suelen Nunes da Silva https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-7900 A , Eduardo Gonçalves Xavier A , Fernando Rutz A and Victor Fernando Büttow Roll A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Pelotas, Campus Universitário, S/N, Capão do Leão, RS 96160-000, Brazil.

B EMBRAPA Swine and Poultry, BR 153, km 110, Concórdia, SC 89715-899, Brazil.

* Correspondence to: everton.krabbe@embrapa.br

Handling Editor: Dana Campbell

Animal Production Science 62(9) 880-890 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20384
Submitted: 27 June 2020  Accepted: 21 February 2022   Published: 29 March 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Few studies have been conducted with the Brazilian Embrapa 051 hens to improve the feed conversion rate and control skeletal health in this breed.

Aims: To determine how different feeding volumes affect the laying rate and bone quality of the Embrapa 051 (E051) strain in comparison with Lohmann Brown (LB).

Methods: In total, 600 E051 and 200 LB hens were subjected to the following treatments: (1) control (LB fed 100% of their dietary requirements), (2) E051 fed 93% of the control diet, (3) E051 fed 100% of the control diet, and (4) E051 fed 107% of the control diet.

Key results: Throughout the 37–72 weeks of age, LB hens presented a higher egg production rate than E051 hens (P < 0.05). The bodyweight and egg production rate were lower in E051 when hens received 93% of the E051 control diet. The E051 hens achieved higher values for tibia weight and length and Seedor index than did LB hens (P < 0.05). At Week 40, the E051 hens fed 93% of the control diet presented a greater tibia weight (12.6 vs 11.5 g), length (124.5 vs 118.9 mm) and strength (21.9 vs 15.5 kgf), Seedor index (101.7 vs 96.13), and ash (33.0 vs 29.6%), calcium (11.1 vs 9.8%) and phosphorus (4.9 vs 4.5%) concentrations than did LB hens. However, at 73 weeks of age, the only differences observed in favour of E051 hens fed 93% of the control diet were for tibia weight, tibia length and tibia strength in comparison with LB hens (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: LB hens showed a higher performance, but lower bone quality than did E051 hens. E051 receiving 7% less feed showed a reduced laying rate but, in contrast, better bone quality. This study showed that the best feeding strategy for Embrapa 051 hens was to use the same feeding volume as recommended for Lohmann Brown hens.

Implications: Despite E051 hens showing a lower laying rate than that of LB hens, especially when receiving a restricted amount of feed, E051 is an accessible alternative breed with excellent bone quality for free-range systems in Brazil.

Keywords: bone quality, evaluation, feed supplementation, free range, genetic adaptation, grasses, laying hens, production gains.


References

Alfonso-Carrillo C, Benavides-Reyes C, de los Mozos J, Dominguez-Gasca N, Sanchez-Rodríguez E, Garcia-Ruiz AI, Rodriguez-Navarro AB (2021) Relationship between bone quality, egg production and eggshell quality in laying hens at the end of an extended production cycle (105 weeks). Animals 11, 623
Relationship between bone quality, egg production and eggshell quality in laying hens at the end of an extended production cycle (105 weeks).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33652961PubMed |

Araújo GM, Vieites FM, Souza CS (2012) Importância do desenvolvimento ósseo na avicultura. Archivos de Zootecnia 61, 79–89.
Importância do desenvolvimento ósseo na avicultura.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (2000) ‘AOAC official methods of analysis.’ 17th edn. (AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA)

Barbosa AA, de Moraes GHK, Torres RA, Reis DTCR, Rodrigues CS, Müller ES (2010) Avaliação da qualidade óssea mediante parâmetros morfométricos, bioquímicos e biomecânicos em frangos de corte. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 772–778.
Avaliação da qualidade óssea mediante parâmetros morfométricos, bioquímicos e biomecânicos em frangos de corte.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bertechini AG (2006) ‘Nutrição de monogástricos.’ (Editora UFLA: Lavras, Brazil)

Bishop SC, Fleming RH, McCormack HA, Flock DK, Whitehead CC (2000) Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. British Poultry Science 41, 33–40.
Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10821520PubMed |

Boskey AL, Wright TM, Blank RD (1999) Collagen and bone strength. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 14, 330–335.
Collagen and bone strength.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10027897PubMed |

Campbell DLM (2020) Skeletal health of layers across all housing systems and future research directions for Australia. Animal Production Science 61, 883–892.
Skeletal health of layers across all housing systems and future research directions for Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

da Silva SN, Forgiarini J, Alves DA, Krabbe EL, Avila VS, Lopes DCN, Xavier EG (2020) Performance and egg quality of Embrapa 051 laying hens subjected to different feeding programs. Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE) 14, 64–73.
Performance and egg quality of Embrapa 051 laying hens subjected to different feeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Avila VS, de Figueiredo EAP, Krabbe EL, Duarte SC, Saatkamp MG (2017) Poedeira Embrapa 051-guia de manejo das poedeiras coloniais de ovos castanhos. Embrapa Suínos e Aves-Fôlder/Folheto/Cartilha (INFOTECA-E). Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1076928/poedeira-embrapa-051---guia-de-manejo-das-poedeiras-coloniais-de-ovos-castanhos

de Avila VS, Krabbe EL, Caron L, Saatkamp MG, Soares JPG (2019) Ecological egg production systems. Available at https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1115096/ecological-egg-production-systems [Accessed 7 April 2020]

Eastell R, Lambert H (2002) Diet and healthy bones. Calcified Tissue International 70, 400–404.
Diet and healthy bones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11960202PubMed |

Field RA (2000) Ash and calcium as measures of bone in meat and bone mixtures. Meat Science 55, 255–264.
Ash and calcium as measures of bone in meat and bone mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22061280PubMed |

Figueiredo EAP, Schmidt G, Avila VS, Jaenisch F, Mazzuco H (2001) Manejo das poedeiras coloniais de ovos castanhos-Embrapa 051. Embrapa Suínos e Aves-Fôlder/Folheto/Cartilha (INFOTECA-E). Available at https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1026304/manual-de-manejo-das-poedeiras-coloniais-de-ovos-castanhos-embrapa-051.

Fleming RH, Mccormack HA, McTeir L, Whitehead CC (1998) Medullary bone and humeral breaking strength in laying hens. Research in Veterinary Science 64, 63–67.
Medullary bone and humeral breaking strength in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9557808PubMed |

Harms RH, Russell GB, Sloan DR (2000) Performance of four strains of commercial layers with major changes in dietary energy. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 9, 535–541.
Performance of four strains of commercial layers with major changes in dietary energy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hester PY, Kounev Z, Schreiweis MA (2002) The effect of age on bone mineral density and content of White Pekin ducks as assessed through densitometry. Poultry Science 81, 62

Hudson HA, Britton WM, Rowland GN, Buhr RJ (1993) Histomorphometric bone properties of sexually immature and mature White Leghorn hens with evaluation of fluorochrome injection on egg production traits. Poultry Science 72, 1537–1547.
Histomorphometric bone properties of sexually immature and mature White Leghorn hens with evaluation of fluorochrome injection on egg production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 8378222PubMed |

Iqbal A, Qudoos A, Çetingül İS, Shah SRA, Bayram I (2019) Importance of dietary fiber in poultry nutrition. Journal of Animal Science and Products (JASP) 2, 21–29.

Jalal MA, Scheideler SE, Marx D (2006) Effect of bird cage space and dietary metabolizable energy level on production parameters in laying hens. Poultry Science 85, 306–311.
Effect of bird cage space and dietary metabolizable energy level on production parameters in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16523631PubMed |

Jalal MA, Scheideler SE, Pierson EM (2007) Strain response of laying hens to varying dietary energy levels with and without avizyme supplementation. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 289–295.
Strain response of laying hens to varying dietary energy levels with and without avizyme supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Krabbe EL, Forgiarini J, Silva SN, Contreira CL, Saatkamp MG, Lopes LS, de Avila VS (2016) Comportamento de ingestão de ração da poedeira 051 com diferentes níveis de ofertas de alimento. In ‘Conferência Apinco de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas’ Anais. pp. 1–3 (FACTA: Fundação Apinco de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas: ampinas, SP, Brazil)

Ledur MC, Figueiredo EAP, Schmidt GS, de Avila VS, Peixoto JOO (2011) Melhoramento genético de aves no Brasil e as contribuições da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. In ‘Sonho, desafio e tecnologia: 35 anos de contribuições da Embrapa Suínos e Aves’. (Eds JCPVB Souza, DJD Talamini, GN Scheuermann, GS Schmidt) pp. 293–316. (Embrapa Suínos e Aves: Concórdia, Brazil)

Leeson S, Summers JD (1997) ‘Commercial poultry nutrition.’ 2nd edn. (Univerty Books: Guelph-Ontario, Canada)

Leeson S, Summers JD, Caston LJ (2001) Response of layers to low nutrient density diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 10, 46–52.
Response of layers to low nutrient density diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li F, Zhang LM, Wu XH, Li CY, Yang XJ, Dong Y, Lemme A, Han JC, Yao JH (2013) Effects of metabolizable energy and balanced protein on egg production, quality, and components of Lohmann Brown laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22, 36–46.
Effects of metabolizable energy and balanced protein on egg production, quality, and components of Lohmann Brown laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lohmann do Brasil (2011) ‘Guia de Manejo Lohmann Brown.’ (Lohmann do Brasil: São José do Rio Preto, Brazil)

Miele M, Girotto AF, Palhares JCP, Figueiredo EA, Saatkamp MG (2008) Avaliação dos Impactos Econômicos, Sociais e Ambientais da Poedeira Colonial Embrapa 051 (No. 1349-2016-107327). Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6525093.pdf

Monteagudo MD, Hernández ER, Seco C, Gonzales-Riola J, Revilla M, Villa LF, Rico H (1997) Comparison of the bone robusticity index and bone weight/bone length index with the results of bone densitometry and bone histomorphometry in experimental studies. Cells Tissues Organs 160, 195–199.
Comparison of the bone robusticity index and bone weight/bone length index with the results of bone densitometry and bone histomorphometry in experimental studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mueller WJ, Schraer R, Scharer H (1964) Calcium metabolism and skeletal dynamics of laying pullets. The Journal of Nutrition 84, 20–26.
Calcium metabolism and skeletal dynamics of laying pullets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14210016PubMed |

Murugesan GR, Persia ME (2013) Validation of the effects of small differences in dietary metabolizable energy and feed restriction in first-cycle laying hens. Poultry Science 92, 1238–1243.
Validation of the effects of small differences in dietary metabolizable energy and feed restriction in first-cycle laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23571333PubMed |

Novak CL, Yakout HM, Remus J (2008) Response to varying dietary energy and protein with or without enzyme supplementation on Leghorn performance and economics. 2. Laying period. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 17, 17–33.
Response to varying dietary energy and protein with or without enzyme supplementation on Leghorn performance and economics. 2. Laying period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nunes JK, Santos VL, Rossi P, Anciuti MA, Rutz F, Maier JC, Silva JGC (2013) Quality of eggs and bone strength of layers fed organic minerals. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 65, 610–618.
Quality of eggs and bone strength of layers fed organic minerals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pessoa GBS, Salguero SC, Albino LFT, Nogueira ET, Rostagno HS (2015) Atualização de Programas Nutricionais para Poedeiras. In ‘XIII Congresso APA – Produção e Comercialização de Ovos’. Available at https://pt.engormix.com/avicultura/artigos/atualizacao-programas-nutricionais-poedeiras-t38649.htm

Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2020) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-151. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

R Core Team (2019) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.R-project.org/

Rath NC, Huff GR, Huff WE, Balog JM (2000) Factors regulating bone maturity and strength in poultry. Poultry Science 79, 1024–1032.
Factors regulating bone maturity and strength in poultry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10901206PubMed |

Regmi P, Deland TS, Steibel JP, Robison CI, Haut RC, Orth MW, Karcher DM (2015) Effect of rearing environment on bone growth of pullets. Poultry Science 94, 502–511.
Effect of rearing environment on bone growth of pullets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25638471PubMed |

Reisenfeld A (1972) Metatarsal robusticity in bipedal rats. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 40, 229–234.
Metatarsal robusticity in bipedal rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ribeiro PAP, Matos Júnior JB, Queiroz ACA, Lara LJC, Baião NC (2013) Efeito dos níveis de energia para poedeiras comerciais no período final de produção sobre o desempenho a conversão alimentar e energética e a qualidade de ovos. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 65, 1491–1499.
Efeito dos níveis de energia para poedeiras comerciais no período final de produção sobre o desempenho a conversão alimentar e energética e a qualidade de ovos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, Gomes PC, Oliveira RF, Lopes DC, Euclides RF (2011) ‘Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais de aves e suínos.’ 3rd edn. (UFV: Viçosa, Brazil)

Seedor JG, Quartuccio HA, Thompson DD (1991) The biophosphanate alendronate (MK-217) inhibit bone loss due to ovariectomy in rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 6, 339–346.
The biophosphanate alendronate (MK-217) inhibit bone loss due to ovariectomy in rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1858520PubMed |

Scott ML, Nesheim MC, Young RJ (1982) ‘Nutrition of the chicken.’ 3rd edn. (M.L Scott Associates: Ithaca, NY, USA)

Sparke AJ, Sims TJ, Avery NC, Bailey AJ, Fleming RH, Whitehead CC (2002) Differences in composition of avian bone collagen following genetic selection for resistance to osteoporosis. British Poultry Science 43, 127–134.
Differences in composition of avian bone collagen following genetic selection for resistance to osteoporosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12003329PubMed |

Whitehead CC (2004) Overview of bone biology in the egg-laying hen. Poultry Science 83, 193–199.
Overview of bone biology in the egg-laying hen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14979569PubMed |

Whitehead CC, Fleming RH (2000) Osteoporosis in cage layers. Poultry Science 79, 1033–1041.
Osteoporosis in cage layers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10901207PubMed |

Zhang B, Coon CN (1997) The relationship of calcium intake, source, size, solubility in vitro and in vivo, and gizzard limestone retention in laying hens. Poultry Science 76, 1702–1706.
The relationship of calcium intake, source, size, solubility in vitro and in vivo, and gizzard limestone retention in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9438285PubMed |