Effect of light and stocking density on performance, breast muscle yield and potential damage caused by feather pecking in two strains of commercial Pekin ducks
J. A. Downing
A *
A School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2572, Australia.
Animal Production Science 62(9) 870-879 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21487
Submitted: 28 September 2021 Accepted: 21 February 2022 Published: 18 March 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Context: Minimal information is available as to the optimal stocking density and light intensity for best performance of commercial ducks.
Aims: To investigate the effects of stocking density and light intensity on commercial Pekin duck production.
Methods: Cherry Valley and Grimaud Freres Pekin ducks were housed at stocking densities of 4.4 (low), 5.2 (medium) and 6 (high) birds/m2 and from 8 to 41 days of age at 6 lux (low) and 45 lux (moderate) light intensities. On Days 14, 28, and 41 of age all ducks were individually weighed, and pen feed and water intakes recorded. On Day 41, one male and female from each pen was euthanised and breast muscle weight determined. At Weeks 3 and 4 all birds were individually examined, for extent of feather and skin damage.
Key results: In all weeks, the Grimaud Freres birds had higher liveweight than Cherry Valley birds. Only at Week 4, birds under low light had higher liveweight than those at moderate light intensity. At Week 4, birds at low densities had higher liveweight, while at Week 6 birds at low and medium stocking densities had higher liveweight than those at high stocking densities. At Week 4, the feed to gain ratio was poorer when birds were housed in moderate light intensity. The stocking density had no effect on the feed to gain ratio. Light and stocking density had no effect on any of the breast muscle measures. In Week 4, the birds housed at medium density had a higher feather and skin damage. At Week 3, more damage was directed to the wings than the thigh regions. There was a higher incidence of damage in some pens irrespective of treatments.
Conclusions: The medium stocking density supported performance equivalent to that at low density and better than at the high density. Ideally the density recommendation should be based on ‘weight density’ (kg/m2) and the current results indicate this was between 16.49 and 19.0 kg/m2. The birds performed similarly under both light intensities.
Implications: The suitable stocking density for efficient production is 16.5–19.0 kg/m2 and housing at 6 or 45 lux had no influence on performance. Best performance and breast muscle yield was from the Grimaud Freres strain.
Keywords: breast muscle yield, Cherry Valley, duck performance, Grimaud Freres, light intensity, liveweight, Pekin ducks, stocking density.
References
Abbas AO, Alm El-Dein AK, Desoky AA, Galal MAA (2008) The effects of photoperiod programs on broiler chicken performance and immune response. International Journal of Poultry Science 7, 665–671.| The effects of photoperiod programs on broiler chicken performance and immune response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Abo Ghanima MM, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha AE, Tufarelli V, Laudadio V, Naiel MAE (2020) Assessment of stocking rate and housing system on performance, carcass traits, blood indices, and meat quality of French Pekin ducks. Agriculture 10, 273
| Assessment of stocking rate and housing system on performance, carcass traits, blood indices, and meat quality of French Pekin ducks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Agresti A (2002) ‘Categorical data analysis.’ 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons: New York)
| Crossref |
Barber CL, Prescott NB, Wathes CM, Le Sueur C, Perry CG (2004) Preferences of growing ducklings and turkey poults for illuminance. Animal Welfare 13, 211–224.
| Preferences of growing ducklings and turkey poults for illuminance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chen Y, Aorigele C, Yan F, Li Y, Chen P, Qi Z (2015) Effect of production system on welfare traits, growth performance and meat quality of ducks. South African Journal of Animal Science 45, 173–179.
| Effect of production system on welfare traits, growth performance and meat quality of ducks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cherry P, Morris TR (2008) Chapter 3: Housing and environment. In ‘Domestic duck production: science and practice’. (Eds T Cherry, TR Morris) pp. 22–52. (CAB Books: Oxfordshire, UK)
D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA (1986) ‘Goodness-of-fit techniques.’ (Eds RB D’Agostino, MA Stephens) pp. 279–318. (Marcel Dekker: New York)
Dong Y, Karcher DM, Erasmus MA (2021) Self- and conspecific-directed pecking behavior of commercial Pekin ducks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 235, 105223
| Self- and conspecific-directed pecking behavior of commercial Pekin ducks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
DPI (2012) Introduction to commercial duck farming. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries. Available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/factsheet
Erdem E, Onbaşilar EE, Gücüyener Hacan Ö (2015) Effects of 16L:8D photoperiod on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat composition, and blood parameters of Pekin ducks. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 39, 568–575.
| Effects of 16L:8D photoperiod on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat composition, and blood parameters of Pekin ducks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FASS (2010) ‘Guide for the care and use of animals in agricultural research and teaching.’ Committees to revise the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching, 3rd edn. pp. 102–120 (Federation of Animal Science Societies: Champaign, IL, USA)
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ‘ASReml user guide.’ Release 3.0. (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK) Available at www.vsni.co.uk
Gordon SH (1994) Effects of daylength and increasing daylength programmes on broiler welfare and performance. World’s Poultry Science Journal (United Kingdom) 50, 269–282.
House GM, Sobotik EB, Nelson JR, Archer GS (2021) Pekin duck productivity, physiological stress, immune response and behavior under 20L:4D and 16L:8D photoperiods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 240, 105351
| Pekin duck productivity, physiological stress, immune response and behavior under 20L:4D and 16L:8D photoperiods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huber-Eicher B, Wechsler B (1997) Feather pecking in domestic chicks: its relation to dustbathing and foraging. Animal Behaviour 54, 757–768.
| Feather pecking in domestic chicks: its relation to dustbathing and foraging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9344430PubMed |
Kliger CA, Gehad AE, Hulet RM, Roush WB, Lillehoj HS, Mashaly MM (2000) Effects of photoperiod and melatonin on lymphocyte activities in male broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79, 18–25.
| Effects of photoperiod and melatonin on lymphocyte activities in male broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10685884PubMed |
Knížetoá H, Hyánek J, Hyánková L, Bělícěk P (1995) Comparative study of growth curves in poultry. Genetics Selection Evolution 27, 365
| Comparative study of growth curves in poultry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li W, Yuan J, Ji Z, Wang L, Sun C, Yang X (2018) Correlation search between growth performance and flock activity in automated assessment of Pekin duck stocking density. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 152, 26–31.
| Correlation search between growth performance and flock activity in automated assessment of Pekin duck stocking density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lien RJ, Hess JB, McKee SR, Bilgili SF, Townsend JC (2007) Effect of light intensity and photoperiod on live performance, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and processing yields of broilers. Poultry Science 86, 1287–1293.
| Effect of light intensity and photoperiod on live performance, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and processing yields of broilers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17575173PubMed |
Olanrewaju HA, Thaxton JP, Dozier WA, Purswell J, Roush WB, Branton SL (2006) A review of lighting programs for broiler production. International Journal of Poultry Science 5, 301–308.
| A review of lighting programs for broiler production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Onbaşılar EE, Erdem E, Gürcan IS, Poyraz Ö (2011) Body weight and body measurements of male and female Pekin ducks obtained from breeder flocks of different age. European Poultry Science 75, 268–272.
Park B-S, Um K-H, Park S-O, Zammit VA (2018) Effect of stocking density on behavioral traits, blood biochemical parameters and immune responses in meat ducks exposed to heat stress. Archives Animal Breeding 61, 425–432.
| Effect of stocking density on behavioral traits, blood biochemical parameters and immune responses in meat ducks exposed to heat stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32175449PubMed |
Renden JA, Bilgili SF, Kincaid SA (1993) Research Note: Comparison of restricted and increasing light programs for male broiler performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science 72, 378–382.
| Research Note: Comparison of restricted and increasing light programs for male broiler performance and carcass yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodenburg TB, Bracke MBM, Berk J, Cooper J, Faure JM, Guémené D, Guy G, Harlander A, Jones T, Knierim U, Kuhnt K, Pingel H, Reiter K, Servière J, Ruis MAW (2005) Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems. World’s Poultry Science Journal 61, 633–646.
| Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wechsler B, Huber-Eicher B, Nash DR (1998) Feather pecking in growers: a study with individually marked birds. British Poultry Science 39, 178–185.
| Feather pecking in growers: a study with individually marked birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9649868PubMed |
Xie M, Jiang Y, Tang J, Wen ZG, Huang W, Hou SS (2014) Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass traits, and foot pad lesions of White Pekin ducks. Poultry Science 93, 1644–1648.
| Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass traits, and foot pad lesions of White Pekin ducks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24864281PubMed |
Xin HR, Pan H, Yang L, Bi Y, Xiong BH (2016) Effects of light intensity on performance, carcass performance and meat quality of Pekin ducks. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition 28, 1076–1083.
Zhang YR, Zhang LS, Wang Z, Liu Y, Li FH, Yuan JM, Xia ZF (2018) Effects of stocking density on growth performance, meat quality and tibia development of Pekin ducks. Animal Science Journal 89, 925–930.
| Effects of stocking density on growth performance, meat quality and tibia development of Pekin ducks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29682864PubMed |
