Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using gene expression information obtained by quantitative real-time PCR to evaluate Angus bulls divergently selected for feed efficiency

Y. Chen A C E , P. F. Arthur A C , I. M. Barchia A , K. Quinn B , P. F. Parnell B C D and R. M. Herd B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia.

B NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

D Angus Society of Australia, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: yizhou.chen@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Animal Production Science 52(11) 1058-1067 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12098
Submitted: 16 March 2012  Accepted: 5 June 2012   Published: 15 August 2012

Abstract

Residual feed intake (RFI) is a measure of feed efficiency in beef cattle. Young Angus bulls from lines of cattle divergently selected for RFI were used in a gene expression profiling study of the liver. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was used to quantify the differentially expressed genes and the information was used to examine the relationships between the genes and RFI and to classify the bulls into their respective RFI group. Gene expression of 21 genes in liver biopsies from 22 low RFI and 22 high RFI bulls were measured by qPCR. Gene expressions of 14 of the 21 genes were significantly correlated with RFI. The expression of the genes was used in a principal component analysis from which five components were extracted. The five principal components explained 70% of the variation in the dependency structure. The first component was highly correlated (correlation coefficient of 0.69) with RFI. The genes of the glutathione S-transferase Mu family (GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM4), protocadherin 19 (PCDH19), ATP-binding cassette transporter C4 (ABCC4) and superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3) are in the xenobiotic pathway and were the key factors in the first principal component. This highlights the important relationship between this pathway and variation in RFI. The second and third principal components were also correlated with RFI, with correlation coefficients of –0.28 and –0.20, respectively. Two of the four important genes of the second principal component work coordinately in the signalling pathways that inhibit the insulin-stimulated insulin receptor and regulate energy metabolism. This is consistent with the observation that a positive genetic correlation exists between RFI and fatness. The important genes in the third principal component are related to the extracellular matrix activity, with low RFI bulls showing high extracellular matrix activity.


References

Amador-Noguez D, Dean A, Huang WD, Setchell K, Moore D, Darlington G (2007) Alterations in xenobiotic metabolism in the long-lived Little mice. Aging Cell 6, 453–470.
Alterations in xenobiotic metabolism in the long-lived Little mice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXptlyksr8%3D&md5=5064b4dc7a5d7707773cbd0300e59914CAS |

Andersen G, Burgdorf KS, Sparso T, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T, Hansen T, Pedersen O (2008) AHSG tag single nucleotide polymorphisms associate with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: studies of metabolic traits in 7,683 white Danish subjects. Diabetes 57, 1427–1432.
AHSG tag single nucleotide polymorphisms associate with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: studies of metabolic traits in 7,683 white Danish subjects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlvVKjuro%3D&md5=89f22ffa8d29092a8184a77083d584e9CAS |

Arányi T, Varadi A, Simon I, Tusnady GE (2006) The BiSearch web server. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 431
The BiSearch web server.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Archer JA, Richardson EC, Herd RM, Arthur PF (1999) Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 147–161.
Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arthur PF, Archer JA, Johnston DJ, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Parnell PF (2001) Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2805–2811.

Arthur PF, Herd RM, Wilkins JF, Archer JA (2005) Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 985–993.
Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arthur PF, Herd RM, Basarab JA (2010) The role of cattle genetically efficient in feed utilisation in an Australian carbon trading environment. Australian Farm Business Management Journal 7, 5–14.

Barbado M, Preisser L, Boisdron-Celle M, Verriele V, Lorimier G, Gamelin E, Morel A (2006) Tumor quantification of several fluoropyrimidines resistance gene expression with a unique quantitative RT-PCR method. Implications for pretherapeutic determination of tumor resistance phenotype. Cancer Letters 242, 168–179.
Tumor quantification of several fluoropyrimidines resistance gene expression with a unique quantitative RT-PCR method. Implications for pretherapeutic determination of tumor resistance phenotype.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVGit7rO&md5=6505ca6a9f4ff147973ecd045306f534CAS |

Barendse W, Reverter A, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Barris W, Thomas MB (2007) A validated whole-genome association study of efficient food conversion in cattle. Genetics 176, 1893–1905.
A validated whole-genome association study of efficient food conversion in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVeiur3K&md5=c8a011571c1aafdb70ee7f82e41878bcCAS |

Baty F, Facompre M, Kaiser S, Schumacher M, Pless M, Bubendorf L, Savic S, Marrer E, Budach W, Buess M, Kehren J, Tamm M, Brutsche MH (2010) Gene profiling of clinical routine biopsies and prediction of survival in non-small cell lung cancer. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 181, 181–188.
Gene profiling of clinical routine biopsies and prediction of survival in non-small cell lung cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhvFahu7g%3D&md5=bfee3e9fd5d8f1aff85a08fc577390f4CAS |

Bindon BM (2001) Genesis of the Cooperative Research Centre for the Cattle and Beef Industry: integration of resources for beef quality research (1993–2000). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 843–853.
Genesis of the Cooperative Research Centre for the Cattle and Beef Industry: integration of resources for beef quality research (1993–2000).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Birney E, Andrews D, Caccamo M, Chen Y, Clarke L, Coates G, Cox T, Cunningham F, Curwen V, Cutts T, Down T, Durbin R, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flicek P, Gräf S, Hammond M, Herrero J, Howe K, Iyer V, Jekosch K, Kähäri A, Kasprzyk A, Keefe D, Kokocinski F, Kulesha E, London D, Longden I, Melsopp C, Meidl P, Overduin B, Parker A, Proctor G, Prlic A, Rae M, Rios D, Redmond S, Schuster M, Sealy I, Searle S, Severin J, Slater G, Smedley D, Smith J, Stabenau A, Stalker J, Trevanion S, Ureta-Vidal A, Vogel J, White S, Woodwark C, Hubbard TJP (2006) Ensembl 2006. Nucleic Acids Research 34, D556–D561.
Ensembl 2006.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XisFyntA%3D%3D&md5=74f5023abfa10f99ebb2a4cc6c00bf8eCAS |

Bolormaa S, Hayes BJ, Savin K, Hawken R, Barendse W, Arthur PF, Herd RM, Goddard ME (2011) Genome-wide association studies for feedlot and growth traits in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1684–1697.
Genome-wide association studies for feedlot and growth traits in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXnsVWktr0%3D&md5=2d87660a340ad5b0c8374e656685e5e4CAS |

Chen Y, Gondro C, Quinn K, Herd RM, Parnell PF, Vanselow B (2011) Global gene expression profiling reveals genes expressed differentially in cattle with high and low residual feed intake. Animal Genetics 42, 475–490.
Global gene expression profiling reveals genes expressed differentially in cattle with high and low residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtlaktr7P&md5=ecb17804d118a3245342a66556f0baffCAS |

Chen Y, Arthur PF, Herd RM, Quinn K, Barchia IM (2012) Using genes differentially expressed in bulls to classify steers divergently selected for high and low residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 52, 608–612.

Crowley JJ, McGee M, Kenny DA, Crews DH, Evans RD, Berry DP (2010) Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 88, 885–894.
Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktVOqurk%3D&md5=92c906a0415427e4b45ff696b8375241CAS |

Dagliyan O, Uney-Yuksektepe F, Kavakli IH, Turkay M (2011) Optimization based tumor classification from Microarray Gene Expression Data. PLoS ONE 6, e14579
Optimization based tumor classification from Microarray Gene Expression Data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXitFyjsr4%3D&md5=7fc8ca64af1b215e342b94eb59d139f3CAS |

Donoghue KA, Arthur PF, Wilkins JF, Herd RM (2011) Onset of puberty and early-life reproduction in Angus females divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 51, 183–190.
Onset of puberty and early-life reproduction in Angus females divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, Coller H, Loh ML, Downing JR, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, Lander ES (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286, 531–537.
Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmvVOhu7g%3D&md5=a4ca1a950259d0e2695015b92731a32dCAS |

Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biology 8, R19
qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Herd RM, Arthur PF (2009) Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 87, E64–E71.
Physiological basis for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3mtVWksA%3D%3D&md5=5266775eda1897bf3d4bee37a613a420CAS |

Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, Willson TM (2002) The nuclear pregnane X receptor: a key regulator of xenobiotic metabolism. Endocrine Reviews 23, 687–702.
The nuclear pregnane X receptor: a key regulator of xenobiotic metabolism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XosVejtr4%3D&md5=074f5ae7e9eadfb461e9dca7946e6e3bCAS |

Koch RM, Swiger LA, Chambers D, Gregory KE (1963) Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 22, 486–494.

Korkola JE, Houldsworth J, Feldman DR, Olshen AB, Qin LX, Patil S, Reuter VE, Bosl GJ, Chaganti RSK (2009) Identification and validation of a gene expression signature that predicts outcome in adult men with germ cell tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 27, 5240–5247.
Identification and validation of a gene expression signature that predicts outcome in adult men with germ cell tumors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFahsLjO&md5=5e1674d079d5189b9898f060cd84a64dCAS |

Kretschmer XC, Baldwin WS (2005) CAR and PXR: xenosensors of endocrine disrupters? Chemico-Biological Interactions 155, 111–128.
CAR and PXR: xenosensors of endocrine disrupters?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpt1elt7k%3D&md5=4576161f2305d3f24061ee35ddc29edbCAS |

Lavebratt C, Dungner E, Hoffstedt J (2005) Polymorphism of the AHSG gene is associated with increased adipocyte (beta)2-adrenoceptor function. Journal of Lipid Research 46, 2278–2281.
Polymorphism of the AHSG gene is associated with increased adipocyte (beta)2-adrenoceptor function.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVygsr3K&md5=2d661f02d0559f517e72124ab37b8f8fCAS |

Li C, Liang Y-Y, Feng X-H, Tsai SY, Tsai M-J, O’Malley BW (2008) Essential phosphatases and a phospho-degron are critical for regulation of SRC-3/AIB1 coactivator function and turnover. Molecular Cell 31, 835–849.
Essential phosphatases and a phospho-degron are critical for regulation of SRC-3/AIB1 coactivator function and turnover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1amsb7L&md5=20fca7f4677d549f912c2dd9733837e7CAS |

Liu MF, Goonewardene LA, Bailey DRC, Basarab JA, Kemp RA, Arthur PF, Okine EK, Makarechian M (2000) A study on the variation of feed efficiency in station tested beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 435–441.
A study on the variation of feed efficiency in station tested beef bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marino M, di Masi A, Trezza V, Pallottini V, Polticelli F, Ascenzi P (2011) Xenosensors car and pxr at work: impact on statin metabolism. Current Drug Metabolism 12, 300–311.
Xenosensors car and pxr at work: impact on statin metabolism.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXkvVOnu7c%3D&md5=ebe31b7ec1da2fcb209c594e336ad2c1CAS |

Mathews ST, Singh GP, Ranalletta M, Cintron VJ, Qiang X, Goustin AS, Jen K-LC, Charron MJ, Jahnen-Dechent W, Grunberger G (2002) Improved insulin sensitivity and resistance to weight gain in mice null for the Ahsg gene. Diabetes 51, 2450–2458.
Improved insulin sensitivity and resistance to weight gain in mice null for the Ahsg gene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlvFKiu74%3D&md5=bbd45d240e417dfd4cec37616bd5b337CAS |

Moreau A, Vilarem MJ, Maurel P, Pascussi JM (2008) Xenoreceptors CAR and PXR activation and consequences on lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and inflammatory response. Molecular Pharmaceutics 5, 35–41.
Xenoreceptors CAR and PXR activation and consequences on lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and inflammatory response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVOnurzJ&md5=d3d99635f176c6d374d8170b4dd896afCAS |

Nagel DJ, Aizawa T, Jeon K-I, Liu W, Mohan A, Wei H, Miano JM, Florio VA, Gao P, Korshunov VA, Berk BC, Yan C (2006) Role of nuclear Ca2+/calmodulin-stimulated phosphodiesterase 1A in vascular smooth muscle cell growth and survival. Circulation Research 98, 777–784.
Role of nuclear Ca2+/calmodulin-stimulated phosphodiesterase 1A in vascular smooth muscle cell growth and survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XislCltr8%3D&md5=967cf30b8e97e097a7313a954e84d849CAS |

Nkrumah JD, Basarab JA, Wang Z, Li C, Price MA, Okine EK, Crews DH, Moore SS (2007) Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2711–2720.
Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFSjtrnL&md5=fd7de386e4c97dcb1eff2baeeccb80d3CAS |

Payne RW, Harding SA, Murray DA, Soutar DM, Baird DB, Welham SJ, Kane AF, Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Webster R, Tunnicliffe Wilson G (2007) ‘Genstat Release 10. Reference Manual, Part 2 Directives.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Robinson DL, Oddy VH (2004) Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 90, 255–270.
Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Murdoch BM, Moore SS (2008) Identification of polymorphisms influencing feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle. Animal Genetics 39, 225–231.
Identification of polymorphisms influencing feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXnslGrtbg%3D&md5=a09f3f2de2d18f9173613de9ecdf6057CAS |

Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Li C, Bartusiak R, Murdoch B, Moore SS (2009) Fine mapping quantitative trait loci for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 87, 37–45.
Fine mapping quantitative trait loci for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXptFOntw%3D%3D&md5=bdccfd3e80c60326598f4f4004c85614CAS |

Wang YX, Klijn JGM,, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts AM, Look MP, Yang F, Talantov D, Timmermans M, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Yu J, Jatkoe T, Berns EM, Atkins D, Foekens JA (2005) Gene-expression pro-files to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 365, 671–679.

Xu CJ, Li CYT, Kong ANT (2005) Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics. Archives of Pharmacal Research 28, 249–268.
Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjt1Krtb0%3D&md5=bc7a9a03124db1063ef5299e36867516CAS |

Yamada PM, Lee K-W (2009) Perspectives in mammalian IGFBP-3 biology: local vs. systemic action. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 296, C954–C976.
Perspectives in mammalian IGFBP-3 biology: local vs. systemic action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlvFahtbs%3D&md5=8f93fe6b3d60c497bf181e19f69bbf1dCAS |

You M, Lu Y, Liu PY, Yi Y, Morrison C, Yang P, Sun Z, Szoke J, Gerald WL, Watson M, Govindan R, You M (2006) A gene expression signature predicts survival of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS Medicine 3, 2229–2243.