Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Timing irrigation to suit citrus phenology: a means of reducing water use without compromising fruit yield and quality?

R. J. Hutton A C , J. J. Landsberg A and B. G. Sutton B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2768, Australia.

B The University of Sydney, Faculty of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, McMillan Building (AO5), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: ron.hutton@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(1) 71-80 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05233
Submitted: 1 September 2005  Accepted: 26 July 2006   Published: 2 January 2007

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of whether a citrus crop has the same need for water at all stages of development or whether it is possible to withhold water at times when the crop is less sensitive to water stress, thus, reducing total water use and improving water use efficiency while still maintaining yield. To answer this question water applied by irrigation was reduced by up to 33% relative to standard full irrigation by extending the intervals between applications from 3 to 17 days during fruit growth stages II and III in the annual growth cycle. As expected, the longer intervals resulted in greater depletion in soil moisture and significant water stress developed as soil water deficits approached the lower limits of plant available water. Stressed trees exhibited mean pre-dawn water potential (ψl) values of –0.93 MPa and midday ψl values decreased to between –2.0 and –2.5 MPa. Periodic soil water deficits in late summer and autumn reduced shoot growth, but fruit yield was unaffected, and there was no evidence of reduced canopy size. Water use efficiency (mass of fruit produced per unit water applied) improved, but fruit growth was extremely sensitive to moisture stress and extended irrigation intervals in summer and autumn reduced fruit size. Fruit juice quality was also affected, as there was an increase in both total soluble solids and juice acidity, but the practical consequences of these were limited because there were only small changes to the sugar : acid ratios. This work has demonstrated that deficient irrigation during summer can be used to manipulate growth and reduce water use, but at the risk of a marginal reduction in fruit size.

Additional keywords: citrus phenology, fruit yield and quality, irrigation intervals, soil water deficit, water stress.


Acknowledgements

The authors thank NSW Department of Primary Industries for the provision of staff and resources to support the work described in this paper. Likewise, the funding support from HAL (formerly HRDC), NRMS (Murray–Darling Basin Commission) and NPIRD (Land and Water Australia), Leeton Citrus Growers Association, Griffith Citrus Growers’ Association, Murray Valley Citrus Marketing Board, and Berri Fruit Juices (formerly Leeton Citrus Juices) is gratefully acknowledged. We also gratefully acknowledge the valuable assistance offered by management, technical and farm support staff of the Yanco Agricultural Institute who assisted in field site operations, maintenance and data collection. Special thanks must also be extended to Dr Ken Bevington and Dr Neil Coombes (NSW Department of Primary Industries) and Dr Brian Loveys (CSIRO Horticulture), who worked collaboratively with us on associated industry funded projects.


References


ABS (2001) Agriculture Australia 1999–2000. Catalogue no. 7113.0. ABS, Canberra.

Bain JM (1958) Morphological, anatomical and physiological changes in the developing fruit of the ‘Valencia’ orange, Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck. Australian Journal of Botany 6, 1–24.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 3 November 2006)

Meyer WS, Smith DJ, Shell G (1998) Estimating reference evaporation and crop evapotranspiration from weather data and crop coefficients: an addendum to AWRAC Research Project 84/162. Quantifying components of the water balance under irrigated crops. CSIRO Land and Water technical report 1998/34, Canberra.

Myers BJ (1988) Water stress integral – a link between short-term stress and long-term growth. Tree Physiology 4, 315–323.
PubMed |
open url image1

Paleg LG, Aspinall D (Eds) (1981) ‘Biochemistry and physiology of drought resistance in plants.’ (Academic Press: London)

Powell DBB, Thorpe MR (1977) Dynamic aspects of plant–water relations. In ‘Environmental effects on crop physiology’. (Eds JJ Landsberg, CV Cutting) pp. 259–279. (Academic Press: London)

Sauer MR (1951) Growth of orange shoots. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 105–117.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shalhevet J, Mantell A, Bielorai H, Shimshi D (1978) Water requirements of field and orchard crops. Bulletin no. 174. Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.

Slatyer RO (1967) ‘Plant–water relationships.’ (Academic Press: London)

Syvertsen JP (1985) CO2 assimilation and water use efficiency of young expanding citrus leaves. Acta Horticulturae 87, 168–175. open url image1

Turner NC (1981) Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil 58, 339–366.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1