Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Increasing plant density improves weed competition in lentil (Lens culinaris)

G. K. McDonald A D , K. L. Hollaway A B and L. McMurray C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management School of Agriculture and Wine, Waite Campus, The University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

B Victorian Department of Primary Industries, Victorian Institute for Dryland Agriculture, PMB 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.

C South Australian Research and Development Institute, Field Crop Evaluation Unit, PO Box 822, Clare, SA 5453, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: glenn.mcdonald@adelaide.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(1) 48-56 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05168
Submitted: 21 June 2005  Accepted: 26 July 2006   Published: 2 January 2007

Abstract

Lentil (Lens culinaris) is an important pulse crop in the southern and western cropping zones. Weed management can be difficult in lentil because of its poor early growth and the limited range of safe selective post-emergent herbicides available. Experiments were conducted at Minlaton, South Australia, and Horsham, Victoria, to examine the effects of early vigour on the ability of lentil to compete against a broadleaf weed. Early growth in lentil was manipulated by selecting genotypes with different levels of early vigour and by using a range of sowing rates. Canola (Brassica napus cv. Beacon) was used to mimic the growth of a cruciferous weed and it was sown at 0, 0.25 (Minlaton only), 0.5, 1 or 2 kg/ha. Lentil genotypes were selected that represented the range in early vigour currently available within the breeding program. Another experiment examined the effect of plant density of lentils with different degrees of early vigour on the yield of canola. Grain yield of lentil declined as the density of canola increased. The initial reduction in canola yield over sites was about 4%/plant.m2, but was as high as 12%/plant.m2 in one treatment. This yield loss is similar to that reported for other grain legume crops, but is much higher than the initial yield loss reported for wheat. The differences in early vigour between genotypes were insufficient to affect the competitive ability of lentil. In contrast, increasing the sowing rate of lentil significantly reduced canola grain yield and increased lentil grain yield. When the density of canola was low (10 plants/m2), doubling the lentil plant density to 200 plants/m2 limited the yield loss to 10%. The results suggest the level of variation in early vigour among the present genotypes is insufficient to increase the competitive ability of the crop. Increasing the plant population of lentil is a more effective means of suppressing weed growth and increasing grain yield.

Additional keywords: yield loss assessment.


Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by the CRC for Australian Weed Management. The technical assistance of Mr Jim Lewis is gratefully acknowledged. We also wish to acknowledge the collaboration of the Yorke Peninsula Alkaline Soils Group and the assistance of Mr Bruce Cooke in the preparation of the site.


References


Ball DA (1997) The influence of seeing rate on weed control in small red lentil (Lens culinaris). Weed Science 45, 296–300. (verified 17 October 2006)

Brouwer J-B (2002) History of Australian lentil crop improvement. In ‘Proceedings of lentil focus 2002’. (Ed. J-B Brouwer) pp. 8–13. (Pulse Australia Ltd: Sydney)

Cheam AH, Code GR (1995) The biology of Australian weeds. 24. Raphanus raphanistrum L. Plant Protection Quarterly 10, 2–13. (verified 2 November 2006)

Siddique KHM, Loss SP, Regan KL, Pritchard DL (1998) Adaptation of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to short season environments: response to sowing rates. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1057–1066.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Streibig JC, Combellack JH, Pritchard GH, Richardson RG (1989) Estimation of thresholds for weed control in Australian cereals. Weed Research 29, 117–126.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Walsh MJ, Duane RD, Powles SB (2001) High frequency of chlorsulfuron-resistant wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) populations across the Western Australian wheatbelt. Weed Technology 15, 199–203.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Walsh MJ, Powles SB, Beard BR, Parkin BT, Porter SA (2004) Multiple-herbicide resistance across four modes of action in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) Weed Science 52, 8–13.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whish JPM, Sindel BM, Jessop RS, Felton WL (2002) The effect of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of chickpea. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1335–1340.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Young FL, Matthews J, Sauerborn J, Pierterse AH, Kharrat M (2000) Integrated weed management for food legumes and lupins. In ‘Linking research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st century’. (Ed. R Knight) pp. 481–490. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)