Genetic analysis of docility score of Australian Angus and Limousin cattle
S. F. Walkom A B , M. G. Jeyaruban A , B. Tier A and D. J. Johnston A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit*, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: swalkom@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 58(2) 213-223 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16240
Submitted: 15 April 2016 Accepted: 1 September 2016 Published: 13 October 2016
Abstract
The temperament of cattle is believed to affect the profitability of the herd through impacting production costs, meat quality, reproduction, maternal behaviour and the welfare of the animals and their handlers. As part of the national beef cattle genetic evaluation in Australia by BREEDPLAN, 50 935 Angus and 50 930 Limousin calves were scored by seedstock producers for temperament using docility score. Docility score is a subjective score of the animal’s response to being restrained and isolated within a crush, at weaning, and is scored on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 representing the quiet and 5 the extremely nervous or anxious calves. Genetic parameters for docility score were estimated using a threshold animal model with four thresholds (five categories) from a Bayesian analysis carried out using Gibbs sampling in THRGIBBS1F90 with post-Gibbs analysis in POSTGIBBSF90. The heritability of docility score on the observed scale was 0.21 and 0.39 in Angus and Limousin, respectively. Since the release of the docility breeding value to the Australian Limousin population there has been a favourable trend within the national herd towards more docile cattle. Weak but favourable genetic correlations between docility score and the production traits indicates that docility score is largely independent of these traits and that selection to improve temperament can occur without having an adverse effect on growth, fat, muscle and reproduction.
Additional keywords: Bayesian analysis, fat, heritability, muscle, reproduction, temperament, threshold animal model, weight.
References
Abdel-Azim GA, Berger PJ (1999) Properties of threshold model prediction. Journal of Animal Science 77, 582–590.| Properties of threshold model prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjs1eku7c%3D&md5=4aee4628f0952dd6f227a70c17a3f667CAS | 10229353PubMed |
Altarriba J, Varona L, Garcia-Cortes LA, Moreno C (1998) Bayesian inference of variance components for litter size in Rasa Aragonesa sheep. Journal of Animal Science 76, 23–28.
| Bayesian inference of variance components for litter size in Rasa Aragonesa sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXlsVGrtQ%3D%3D&md5=34a31f729b2c9aa08df45f9a8b710cd9CAS | 9464880PubMed |
Beckman DW, Enns RM, Speidel SE, Brigham BW, Garrick DJ (2007) Maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 650–657.
| Maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXit1Wkt7k%3D&md5=881a036e9c9eaa9c1f5d27a33b05f868CAS | 17040937PubMed |
Benhajali H, Boivin X, Sapa J, Pellegrini P, Lajudie P, Boulesteix P, Phocas F (2009) Genetic relationships across four criteria of Limousin calf temperament in restrained or unrestrained conditions. In ‘Proceedings of the 60th annual meeting EAAP (Barcelona)’. 15, 283.
Boivin X, Le Neindre P, Chupin JM (1992) Establishment of cattle-human relationships. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32, 325–335.
| Establishment of cattle-human relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burrow HM (1997) Measurements of temperament and their relationships with performance traits of beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 65, 477–496.
Burrow HM (2001) Variances and covariances between productive and adaptive traits and temperament in a composite breed of tropical beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 70, 213–233.
| Variances and covariances between productive and adaptive traits and temperament in a composite breed of tropical beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burrow HM, Corbet NJ (2000) Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 155–162.
| Genetic and environmental factors affecting temperament of zebu and zebu-derived beef cattle grazed at pasture in the tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corbet NJ, Burns BM, Johnston DJ, Wolcott ML, Corbet DH, Venus BK, Li Y, McGowan MR, Holroyd RG (2013) Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle. 2. Genetic parameters of bull traits. Animal Production Science 53, 101–113.
| Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle. 2. Genetic parameters of bull traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXns12jtg%3D%3D&md5=de93b92373d545f05ea7aeaad7fbf11cCAS |
Ewbank R (1961) The behaviour of cattle in crushes. The Veterinary Record 73, 853–856.
Fordyce G, Goddard ME, Seifert GW (1982) The measurement of temperament in cattle and the effect of experience and genotype. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14, 329–332.
Fordyce G, Dodt RM, Wythes JR (1988) Cattle temperaments in extensive beef herds in northern Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 683–687.
| Cattle temperaments in extensive beef herds in northern Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398–409.
| Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (1995) ‘Beysian data analysis.’ 1st edn. (Chapman and Hall: London)
Gianola D (1982) Theory and analysis of threshold characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 54, 1079–1096.
| Theory and analysis of threshold characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gianola D, Foulley JL (1983) Sire evaluation of ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 15, 201–223.
| Sire evaluation of ordered categorical data with a threshold model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38fpvVagsg%3D%3D&md5=eaf48ee4b0ba0ae78306164cdbe2fa39CAS |
Grandin T (1993) Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36, 1–9.
| Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Graser H, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Halloway DR, Johnston DJ (2003) Evaluation of flight time and crush score as measures of temperament in Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding Genetics 15, 261–264.
Harville DA, Mee RW (1984) A mixed-model procedure for analysing ordered categorical data. Biometrics 40, 393–408.
| A mixed-model procedure for analysing ordered categorical data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haskell MJ, Simm G, Turner SP (2014) Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle. Frontiers in Genetics 5, 368
| Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25374582PubMed |
Hearnshaw H, Morris CA (1984) Genetic and environmental effects on a temperament score in beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 723–733.
| Genetic and environmental effects on a temperament score in beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hearnshaw H, Barlow R, Want G (1979) Development of a temperament or handling difficulty score for cattle. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding Genetics 1, 164–166.
Hoeschele I, Tier B, Graser H-U (1995) Multiple-trait genetic evaluation for one polychotomous trait and several continuous traits with missing data and unequal models. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1609–1627.
| Multiple-trait genetic evaluation for one polychotomous trait and several continuous traits with missing data and unequal models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXmtV2is78%3D&md5=c430de2f176fea975cb4740efa793e18CAS | 7673055PubMed |
Hoppe S, Brandt HR, König S, Erhardt G, Gauly M (2010) Temperament traits of beef calves measured under field conditions and their relationships to performance. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1982–1989.
| Temperament traits of beef calves measured under field conditions and their relationships to performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmvVeqt70%3D&md5=9ed85006f5606bbadfd818c1c724d339CAS | 20154170PubMed |
Jamrozik J, Schaeffer LR, Burnside EB, Sullivan BP (1991) Threshold models applied to Holstein conformation traits. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3196–3201.
| Threshold models applied to Holstein conformation traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK387jvVyntg%3D%3D&md5=dcaf5f8592ea694e9b2e6200a61b2469CAS | 1779068PubMed |
Jeyaruban G, Tier B, Johnston D, Graser H-U (2012) Genetic analysis of feet and leg traits of Australian Angus cattle using linear and threshold models. Animal Production Science 52, 1–10.
| Genetic analysis of feet and leg traits of Australian Angus cattle using linear and threshold models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston DJ, Tier B, Graser H-U, Girard C (1999) Presenting BREEDPLAN version 4.1. Proceedings of the Association for Advancement of Animal Breeding Genetics 13, 193–196.
Johnston DJ, Reverter A, Burrow HM, Oddy VH, Robinson DL (2003) Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 1. Animal measures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 107–118.
| Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 1. Animal measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kadarmideen HN, Thompson R, Simm G (2000) Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle. British Society of Animal Science 71, 411–419.
| Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kadel MJ, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Graser HU, Ferguson DM (2006) Genetics of flight time and other measures of temperament and their value as selection criteria for improving meat quality traits in tropical adapted breeds of beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1029–1035.
| Genetics of flight time and other measures of temperament and their value as selection criteria for improving meat quality traits in tropical adapted breeds of beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Le Neindre P, Trillat G, Sapa J, Ménisser F, Bonnet JN, Chupin JM (1995) Individual differences in docility in Limiousin cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2249–2253.
| Individual differences in docility in Limiousin cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnsVCntrs%3D&md5=8e3e3e2df4e6c5e565917d25ed60fde0CAS | 8567460PubMed |
Misztal I, Gianola D, Foulley JL (1989) Computing aspects of a nonlinear method of sire evaluation for categorical data. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 1557–1568.
| Computing aspects of a nonlinear method of sire evaluation for categorical data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH (2002) BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In ‘Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’, 19–23 August 2002, Montpellier, France. CD-ROM Communication no. 28-07.
Murphey RM, Moura Duarte FA, Torres Penedo MC (1980) Approachability of bovine cattle in pastures: breed comparisions and a breed x treatment analysis. Behavior Genetics 10, 171–181.
| Approachability of bovine cattle in pastures: breed comparisions and a breed x treatment analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7lvFyksg%3D%3D&md5=0a1acf8312e13a5c3a36edbb9ea01e9dCAS | 7213302PubMed |
Nkrumah JD, Crews DH, Basarab JA, Price MA, Okine EK, Wang Z, Li C, Moore SS (2007) Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2382–2390.
| Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFSjtrrP&md5=c70454bb01f6786f89b80aba899a0424CAS | 17591713PubMed |
O’Connor CE, Jay NP, Nicol AM, Beatson PR (1985) Ewe maternal behaviour score and lamb survival. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 159–162.
Phocas F, Boivin X, Sapa J, Trillat G, Boissy A, Le Neindre P (2006) Genetic correlation between temperament and breeding traits in Limousin heifers. Animal Science 82, 805–811.
| Genetic correlation between temperament and breeding traits in Limousin heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prayaga KC, Henshall JM (2005) Adaptability in tropical beef cattle: genetic parameters of growth, adaptive and temperament traits in a crossbred population. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 971–983.
| Adaptability in tropical beef cattle: genetic parameters of growth, adaptive and temperament traits in a crossbred population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reinhardt CD, Busby WD, Corah LR (2009) Relationship of various incoming cattle traits with feedlot performance and carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3030–3042.
| Relationship of various incoming cattle traits with feedlot performance and carcass traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFWjsr7I&md5=073765b5c27da0c42ac18158db81b268CAS | 19465501PubMed |
SAS Institute Inc (2008) ‘SAS/STAT® 9.2 user’s guide.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)
Sato S (1981) Factors associated with temperament of beef cattle. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 85, 2382–2390.
Stricklin WR, Heisler CE, Wilson LL (1980) Heritability of temperament in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 51, 109
Thompson R (1979) Sire evaluation. Biometrics 35, 339–353.
| Sire evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tier B, Henshall JM, McSweeny JM (2001) Potential for improving the docility of Limousin cattle in Australia. Proceedings of the Association of Advanced Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 345
Tsuruta S, Misztal I (2006) THRGIBBS1F90 for estimation of variance components with threshold and linear models. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’, 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. pp. 27–31. (Instituto Prociência)
Tulloh NM (1961) Behaviour of cattle in yards. II. A study of temperament. Animal Behaviour 9, 25–30.
| Behaviour of cattle in yards. II. A study of temperament.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanderwert W, Berger LL, McKeith FK, Baker AM, Gonyou HW, Bechtel PJ (1985) Influence of zeranol implants on growth, behavior and carcass traits in Angus and Limousin bulls and steers. Journal of Animal Science 61, 310–319.
| Influence of zeranol implants on growth, behavior and carcass traits in Angus and Limousin bulls and steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2FgslyrtQ%3D%3D&md5=533119d3f546e8abb58d6b7472976349CAS | 4044429PubMed |
