Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of predictive equations developed to assess body composition of F1 Nellore × Angus bulls and steers

M. A. Fonseca A B C , S. C. Valadares Filho A , L. O. Tedeschi B , M. L. Chizzotti A , M. G. Machado A and D. C. Abreu A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.

B Texas A&M University, Department of Animal Science, College Station, TX 77843-2471, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: mozartfonseca@tamu.edu

Animal Production Science 55(8) 978-987 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13439
Submitted: 24 October 2013  Accepted: 8 July 2014   Published: 31 October 2014

Abstract

We evaluated and compared empirical equations used for assessing beef cattle body composition, developed in 2010 (M10), 2012 (M12), 2006 (V06) and 1946 (HH46). Forty-eight F1 Nellore × Angus bulls and steers, aged 12.5 ± 0.51 months old, with initial shrunk bodyweight of 233 ± 23.5 kg and 238 ± 24.6 kg, respectively, were used in this experiment. The trial was a randomised factorial arrangement of treatments (two genders and five slaughter weights). The animals were randomly assigned to five slaughter-weight-based groups: baseline, maintenance, and 380, 440 and 500 kg. The diet comprised maize silage and concentrate (60 : 40). After slaughter, the 9th–11th rib section cut was dissected into muscle, fat and bone. The remaining carcass was similarly dissected. Other variables evaluated as partial predictors of body composition included empty bodyweight, dressing percentage, visceral fat percentage, and organ and viscera percentage. The values estimated with predictive equations were compared with observed values. For the physically separable carcass composition, only the M12 equation estimated precisely and accurately the amount of muscle (r2 = 0.98, root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 5.64 kg, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.96) and fat (r2 = 0.94, RMSE = 4.91 kg, CCC = 0.96) tissue present in the carcass. The V06 and M10 equations estimated precisely and accurately the amount of carcass chemical components; HH46 could explain only the amount of crude protein (r2 = 0.84, RMSE = 4.71 kg, CCC = 0.90) content in the carcass. The equations used to predict empty body chemical composition failed to estimate correctly the amount of chemical contents present in the empty bodyweight. However, V06 can be used to estimate the crude protein (r2 = 0.91, RMSE = 5.97 kg, CCC = 0.93) content in the empty bodyweight. Furthermore, M10 could be used to estimate ether extract (r2 = 0.94, RMSE = 8.13 kg, CCC = 0.84) content, although this had to be analysed by gender, because such variables (i.e. ether extract) presented a pronounced effect, especially for steers, on total chemical fat.

Additional keywords: carcass assessment, carcass composition, cattle feedlot, cattle growth, modeling cattle.


References

AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ (Association of Official Analysis Chemists: Arlington, VA)

Berg RT, Butterfield RM (1976) ‘New concepts of cattle growth.’ (Macarthur Press: Sydney)

Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) ‘Experimental design.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)

Costa e Silva LF, Valadares Filho SC, Detmann E, Marcondes MI, Rotta PP, Prados LF, Zanetti D (2013) Evaluation of equations to predict body composition in Nellore bulls. Livestock Science 151, 46–57.
Evaluation of equations to predict body composition in Nellore bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandes HJ, Tedeschi LO, Paulino MF, Paiva LM (2010) Determination of carcass and body fat compositions of grazing crossbreed bulls using body measurements. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1442–1453.
Determination of carcass and body fat compositions of grazing crossbreed bulls using body measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXksVCnsrY%3D&md5=eab73d3cfcd5941c39babfdb69a58d41CAS | 19933431PubMed |

Fisher AV (1975) The accuracy of some body measurements on live beef steers. Livestock Production Science 2, 357–366.
The accuracy of some body measurements on live beef steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hankins OG, Howe PE (1946) Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Technical Bulletin No. 926. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

Hedrick HB (1983) Methods of estimating live animal and carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 57, 1316–1327.

Kohn RA, Kalscheur KF, Hanigan M (1998) Evaluation of models for balancing the protein requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 3402–3414.
Evaluation of models for balancing the protein requirements of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjvVantQ%3D%3D&md5=0a470fc25f4eda343356f693722c45a2CAS | 9891283PubMed |

Lin LIK (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255–268.
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kslKrtg%3D%3D&md5=6fb00a32ae71a82eb32e1ddc029fe59aCAS |

Loague K, Green RE (1991) Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 7, 51–73.
Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXktFCru74%3D&md5=b1592921f6abd2701603e49679d8e41dCAS |

Marcondes MI (2010) Nutrient requirements and prediction of body composition of purebred and crossbred Nellore cattle. PhD thesis. Federal University of Vicosa, MG, Brazil.

Marcondes MI, Paulino PVR, Valadares Filho SC, Giobenlli MP, Chizzotti ML, Costa e Silva LF, Tedeschi LO (2010) Prediction of body composition and carcass chemical composition of purebred and crossbred Nellore cattle. In ‘Nutrient requirements of zebu beef cattle (BR-CORTE)’. (Eds SC Valadares Filho, MI Marcondes, ML Chizzotti and PVR Paulino) pp. 65–84. (Suprema Gráfica Ltda: São Carlos, SP, Brazil)

Marcondes MI, Tedeschi LO, Valadares Filho SC, Chizzotti ML (2012) Prediction of physical and chemical body compositions of purebred and crossbred Nellore cattle using the composition of a rib section. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1280–1290.
Prediction of physical and chemical body compositions of purebred and crossbred Nellore cattle using the composition of a rib section.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XkvFanur0%3D&md5=7326750a1238e1eee8b2d42641a2d129CAS | 22147483PubMed |

Mayer DG, Butler DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecological Modelling 68, 21–32.
Statistical validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Owens FN, Gill DR, Secrist DS, Coleman SW (1995) Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3152–3172.

Reid JT, Wellington GH, Dunn HO (1955) Some relationships among the major chemical components of the bovine body and their application to nutritional investigations. Journal of Dairy Science 38, 1344–1359.
Some relationships among the major chemical components of the bovine body and their application to nutritional investigations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaG28XitVylsA%3D%3D&md5=6d26bd287b9cc432cf02c71c60fc9590CAS |

Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.
Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Valadares Filho SC, Paulino PVR, Magalhães KA (2006) ‘Exigências nutricionais de zebuínos e tabelas de composição de alimentos – BR CORTE.’ (Suprema Grafica Ltda: São Carlos, SP, Brazil)