Comparison of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) with crossbred and purebred Brahman cattle for growth performance on savannah and slaughter traits at four ages in Venezuela
A. Rodas-González A E , N. Huerta-Leidenz B , A. Vidal B , O. Colina C , J. Lopez B and R. Rodriguez D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad del Zulia, Apartado 15252, Maracaibo, Venezuela.
B Facultad de Agronomía, Instituto de Investigaciones Agronómicas, Universidad del Zulia, Apartado 15205, Maracaibo, Venezuela.
C Instituto Universitario Tecnológico de Maracaibo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela.
D Agropecuaria Flora C.A., Valencia, Estado Carabobo, Venezuela.
E Corresponding author. Email: argenisrodas@yahoo.es
Animal Production Science 55(8) 967-977 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13352
Submitted: 1 October 2012 Accepted: 12 May 2014 Published: 17 September 2014
Abstract
Males (n = 132) of water buffalo (Buffalo), Brahman crossbred and purebred cattle (Brahman) were born, raised, weaned, castrated (half of the animals at 7 months) and fattened on the same grazing savannahs, and then slaughtered at four different ages (7, 17, 19 and 24 months) to compare growth and slaughter traits and examine post-weaning castration effects. Buffalo showed consistently faster weight gains and heavier carcasses but had lower dressing percentages than Brahman cattle due to higher proportions of hide, head, and red and white viscera at each age (P < 0.05). Additionally, Buffalo had abundant fat cover distribution, and whiter subcutaneous fat than Brahman (P < 0.05), this resulted in a higher proportion of Buffalo carcasses that graded in the second quality Venezuelan grade ‘A’ (P < 0.05). Regardless of species, bulls had higher average daily gain and liveweight than steers (P < 0.05); however, no differences were detected in carcass weight and dressing percentages (P > 0.05). Also, at the same weight steers produced carcasses with thicker back fat, more abundant fat cover distribution and whiter fat than bulls (P < 0.05). With respect to age groups, there were concomitant increases in slaughter weight, carcass weight, and dressing percentage as age increased (P < 0.01). As age advanced, carcasses had a more convex leg profile, abundant fat cover, thicker back fat, higher marbling and greater REA (P < 0.05). Based on the observed growth and carcass traits, Buffalo offer a promising alternative for meat production under savannah feeding production systems.
Additional keywords: beef cattle, carcass grade, dressing percentage, growth performance, water buffalo.
References
Angulo RA, Restrepo LF, Berdugo JA (2005) Características de calidad de las canales bufalinas y vacunas comercializadas en Medellín, Colombia. Livestock Research for Rural Development [Online]. 17(9), Article 103. Available at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/9/angu17103.htm [Verified 11 December 2013]Argañosa FC, Sanchez PC, Ibarra PI, Gerpacio AL, Castilio L, Argañosa VG (1973) Evaluation of carabeef as a potential substitute for beef. Philippine Journal of Nutrition 26, 128–143.
Charles DD, Johnson ER (1975) Comparison of liveweight gain and changes in carcass composition between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Bos taurus steers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 407–413.
| Comparison of liveweight gain and changes in carcass composition between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Bos taurus steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
COVENIN (1983) ‘Comisión Venezolana de Normas Industriales. Norma venezolana 2072–83. Ganado bovino. Inspección Postmortem. Ministerio de Fomento. Fondonorma.’ pp 10 (Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición: Caracas, Venezuela)
Decreto Presidencial No. 1896. (1997). Gaceta Oficial de la República de Venezuela No. 36, 242. 202–204. (Caracas, Venezuela)
Ffoulkes D (1992) High quality meat production from Swamp buffaloes (with special reference to Australia). In ‘Buffalo production (World Animal Science, C6)’. (Eds NM Tulloh, JHG Holmes) pp 455–464 (Elsevier: Amsterdam)
Gigli S, Romita A, Borghese A, Mormite M (1982) Water buffaloes and Friesian bovine male performance at different ages. Fifth quarter and carcass characteristics. In ‘Proceedings of II Convegno Internazionale sull’allevamento bufalino nel mondo’. pp 593–609 (Caserta, Italy)
Giuffrida de Mendoza M, Arenas de Moreno L, Huerta-Leidenz N, Uzcátegui-Bracho S, Beriain MJ, Smith GC (2005) Occurrence of conjugated linoleic acid in longissimus dorsi muscle of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Brahman-cross cattle raised under savannah conditions. Meat Science 69, 93–100.
| Occurrence of conjugated linoleic acid in longissimus dorsi muscle of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Brahman-cross cattle raised under savannah conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1Kku7s%3D&md5=615ed9f88736c8aa22e9fbed08af70b6CAS |
Grace J, José JS, Meir P, Miranda HS, Montes RM (2006) Productivity and carbon fluxes of tropical savannas. Journal of Biogeography 33, 387–400.
| Productivity and carbon fluxes of tropical savannas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huerta-Leidenz N, Rodas-González A, Vidal A, Colina O, Rodriguez R (2001) Comparison of water buffaloes vs. Brahman-cross cattle on carcass traits at contemporary ages. In ‘Proceedings of the VI World Buffalo Congress’. Vol 2, pp 46–52 (Maracaibo, Venezuela)
Ichikawa T, Homma H (1986) Comparative studies on feeding buffalo and cattle. 1. DM intake and nutrients digestibility. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture 30, 251–256.
Katiyar RC, Bisth GS (1988a) Nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo and Hariana cattle: a comparative study with oat-hay-based rations. In ‘Proceedings of the II World Buffalo Congress’. Vol 2, pp 189–193 (New Delhi, India)
Katiyar RC, Bisth GS (1988b) Nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo and Hariana cattle: a comparative study with Lucerne-hay-based rations. In ‘Proceedings of the II World Buffalo Congress’. Vol 2, pp 189–193 (New Delhi, India)
Lapitan RM, Del Barrio AN, Katsube O, Tokuda T, Orden EA, Robles AY, Fujihara T, Cruz LC, Kanai Y (2004) Comparison of feed intake, digestibility and fattening performance of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Animal Science Journal 75, 549–555.
| Comparison of feed intake, digestibility and fattening performance of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lapitan RM, Del Barrio AN, Katsube O, Ban-Tokuda T, Orden EA, Robles AY, Fujihara T, Cruz LC, Homma H, Kanai Y (2007) Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Animal Science Journal 78, 596–604.
| Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lapitan RM, Del Barrio AN, Katsube O, Ban-Tokuda T, Orden EA, Robles AY, Cruz LC, Kanai Y, Fujihara T (2008a) Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet. Animal Science Journal 79, 210–217.
| Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lapitan RM, Del Barrio AN, Katsube O, Ban-Tokuda T, Orden EA, Robles AY, Cruz LC, Kanai Y, Fujihara T (2008b) Comparison of fattening performance in Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet. Animal Science Journal 79, 76–82.
| Comparison of fattening performance in Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjt1WltL4%3D&md5=d4ca18dab1abab20e52b6e2c1b9787b7CAS |
Merle S, Sencleer J, Rodas-González A, Gonzalez J, Mansutti D, Huerta-Leidenz N (2004) Comparison of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) vs. Brahman-cross intact males bovines in slaughter characteristics, carcass traits, cutability and longissimus palatability. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal 12, 112–120.
Moran JB (1992) Growth and development of buffaloes. In ‘Buffalo Production (World Animal Science, C6)’. (Eds NM Tulloh, JHG Holmes) pp 191–221 (Elsevier: Amsterdam)
NRC (1981) The water buffalo: new prospects for an underutilized animal. Report of an ad hoc panel of the Advisory Committee on Technology Innovation. In ‘National Research Council’. pp. 21–25 (National Academy Press: Washington DC)
Purchas RW, Thomson NA, Waghorn GC, Death AF (1993) A comparison of carcass and meat characteristics and organ weights of castrate and entire male buffalo and cattle. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53, 407–411.
Ramírez-Reyes B, Verdecia D, Font H, Leyva-Cámbar L, Ramírez-Pérez Y (2010). Rendimiento de la canal en búfalos de río (Bubalus bubalis) y Bovinos mestizos (Bos indicus x Bos taurus) en el Municipio Bayazo. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria [Online]. 11(7):1–11. Available at http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n070710/071016.pdf. [Verified 11 December 2013]
Reggeti J, Rodriguez R, Silva C (1993) Retrospectiva histórica y la producción de búfalos en Venezuela. In ‘Proceedings of the IX Cursillo sobre Bovinos de Carne’. (Eds D Plasse, N Peña, J Arango) pp 179–197 (Universidad de Venezuela: Maracay, Venezuela)
Robertson J, Bouton PE, Harris PV, Shorthose WR, Ratcliff D (1983) A comparison of some properties of beef and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat. Journal of Food Science 48, 686–690.
| A comparison of some properties of beef and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) meat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson J, Ratcliff D, Bouton PE, Harris PV, Shorthose WR (1986) A comparison of some properties of meat from young buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and cattle. Journal of Food Science 51, 47–50.
| A comparison of some properties of meat from young buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
SAS (2003) ‘SAS/STAT user’s guide: statistics.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA)
Spanghero M, Gracco L, Valusso R, Piasentier E (2004) In vivo performance, slaughtering traits and meat quality of bovine (Italian Simmental) and buffalo (Italian Mediterranean) bulls. Livestock Production Science 91, 129–141.
| In vivo performance, slaughtering traits and meat quality of bovine (Italian Simmental) and buffalo (Italian Mediterranean) bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tatum JD, Klein BJ, Williams JFL, Bowling RA (1988) Influence of diet on growth rate and carcass composition of steers differing in frame size and muscle thickness. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1942–1954.
USDA 1979. ‘Official United States standards for grades of feeder cattle.’ (Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
USDA (1997) ‘Official United States standards for grades of carcass beef.’ (Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
Vale WG (1994) Panel: water buffalo world update. Prospect of buffalo production in Latin America. In ‘Proceedings of the IV World Buffalo Congress’. Vol 1, pp 75–87 (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Valin C, Pinkas A, Dragnev H, Boikovski S, Polikronov D (1984) Comparative study of buffalo meat and beef. Meat Science 10, 69–84.
| Comparative study of buffalo meat and beef.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MbmvFChtg%3D%3D&md5=3a0e5ef99261ca73e9b211fb9e91ba03CAS | 22055996PubMed |
