Beef cattle keeping by smallholders in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam in relation to poverty status, community remoteness and ethnicity
Le Thi Thanh Huyen A C E , Dinh Thi Tuyet Van B , André Markemann C , Pera Herold D and Anne Valle Zárate C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A National Institute of Animal Sciences, Thuy Phuong, Chem, Tu Liem, Hanoi, Vietnam.
B University of Hohenheim, Institute for Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences in the Tropics and Subtropics, Department of Rural Development Theory and Policy, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
C University of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics, Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
D Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landentwicklung Baden-Wuerttemberg, Stuttgarter Strasse 161, 70806 Kornwestheim, Germany.
E Corresponding author. Email: lehuyen@uni-hohenheim.de
Animal Production Science 53(2) 163-172 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12117
Submitted: 31 March 2012 Accepted: 1 August 2012 Published: 13 December 2012
Abstract
Vietnam’s national beef demand is continuously increasing, but is not able to be satisfied by domestic supply. Because land scarcity is a major constraint to beef production in many parts of the country, attempts to enhance beef production in Vietnam have focussed on small-scale household farms in remoter areas.
The present study aimed to investigate the relation between cattle keeping and poverty status of household farms in Son La province, north-west Vietnam. In addition, altitude, community remoteness and technology adoption of the investigated households were considered for an evaluation of the feasibility of smallholder beef cattle production in the upland areas. Data on livestock production of 299 randomly selected households of different ethnic groups in the lowlands and highlands of Yen Chau district, Son La province, were collected by using structured and standardised questionnaires. The poverty status of the households was defined on basis of daily per-capita expenditures, dividing the investigated households into poor and non-poor farmers with daily per-capita expenditures below and above the rural poverty line, respectively.
Cattle keeping farms in Yen Chau district showed advantages in terms of available land and labour resources compared with non-cattle keeping farms. Cattle were kept mainly by non-poor farmers, particularly the Thai, whose farm holdings are most commonly located in the lowlands. The number of cattle raised on farm was related to the poverty status of the households and remoteness. Cattle compete with other livestock in the use of limited farm resources. Cattle keeping farms more frequently applied feeding innovations to reduce feed competition on farm than the non-cattle keeping households.
For the very poor, small animals are more appropriate than beef cattle production activities. Only in the identified advantageous regions, smallholder farmers might engage in beef production, if appropriate policies are implemented to support them in raising cattle. Consequently, the development of beef production under those conditions could contribute to poverty reduction by increasing smallholder’s incomes in the remote highland regions.
References
Agresti A (1992) A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statistical Science 7, 131–153.| A survey of exact inference for contingency tables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Batz FJ, Peters KJ, Janssen W (1999) The influence of technology characteristics on the rate and speed of adoption. Agricultural Economics 21, 121–130.
| The influence of technology characteristics on the rate and speed of adoption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carletto C (1999) ‘Constructing samples for characterizing household food security and for monitoring and evaluating food security interventions: theoretical concerns and practical guidelines.’ Technical Guide No. 8. (International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC)
Chilonda P, Otte J (2006) Indicators to monitor trends in livestock production at national, regional and international levels. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (8). Available at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/8/chil18117.htm [Verified 22 November 2012]
Conroy C, Thakur Y, Vadher M (2002) The efficacy of participatory development of technologies: experiences with resource-poor goat-keepers in India. Livestock Research for Rural Development 14 (3). Available at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd14/3/conr143.htm [Verified 22 November 2012]
Cramb RA, Purcell T, Ho TCS (2004) Participatory assessment of rural livelihoods in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Agricultural Systems 81, 255–272.
| Participatory assessment of rural livelihoods in the Central Highlands of Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Animal Husbandry (2006) ‘The report of animal husbandry sector in the period from 2001 to 2005 and the direction for the development of the period from 2006 to 2015.’ (Department of Animal Husbandry: Hanoi, Vietnam) [In Vietnamese]
Dolberg F (2001) A livestock development approach that contributes to poverty alleviation and widespread improvement of nutrition among the poor. Livestock Research for Rural Development 13 (5) 2001. Available at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd13/5/dolb135.htm [Verified 22 November 2012]
FAO (2005) ‘FAOSTAT database.’ (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations: Rome, Italy) Available at http://faostat.fao.org/ [Verified 22 November 2012]
Floyd C, Harding AH, Paudel KC, Rasali DP, Subedi K, Subedi (2003) Household adoption and the associated impact of multiple agricultural technologies in the western hills of Nepal. Agricultural Systems 76, 715–738.
| Household adoption and the associated impact of multiple agricultural technologies in the western hills of Nepal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fujisaka S (1994) Learning from six reasons why farmers do not adopt innovations intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture. Agricultural Systems 46, 409–425.
| Learning from six reasons why farmers do not adopt innovations intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grosh M, Glewwe P (1998) The World Bank’s living standard measurement study households surveys. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 187–196.
| The World Bank’s living standard measurement study households surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall DC, Thao TD, Minh DV, Lien LV (2006) ‘Competitiveness of the livestock sector in Vietnam. A study conducted by the FAO of the United Nations for the World Bank.’ (The World Bank, DC)
Huong TL, Winters P (2001) Aid policies and poverty alleviation: the case of Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 8, 27–44.
Huyen LTT, Lemke U, Valle Zárate A (2006) ‘Ruminant breeds and production systems in North Vietnam and their contribution to smallholder households in mountainous areas.’ (Verlag Ulrich E. Grauer: Stuttgart, Germany)
Huyen LTT, Herold P, Valle Zárate A (2010) Farm types for beef production and their economic success in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam. Agricultural Systems 103, 137–145.
| Farm types for beef production and their economic success in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huyen LTT, Herold P, Markemann A, Valle Zárate A (2011) Resource use, cattle performance and output patterns on different farm types in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam. Animal Production Science 51, 650–661.
| Resource use, cattle performance and output patterns on different farm types in a mountainous province of northern Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jeansonne A (2002) Loglinear models. Available at http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~efc/classes/biol710/loglinear/Log%20Linear%20Models.htm [Verified 7 September 2012]
Lapar ML, Ehui SK (2004) Factors affecting adoption of dual-purpose forages in the Philippine uplands. Agricultural Systems 81, 95–114.
| Factors affecting adoption of dual-purpose forages in the Philippine uplands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemke U, Kaufmann B, Thuy LT, Emrich K, Valle Zárate A (2006) Evaluation of smallholder pig production systems in North Vietnam: pig production management and pig performances. Livestock Science 105, 229–243.
| Evaluation of smallholder pig production systems in North Vietnam: pig production management and pig performances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Longworth JW, Brown CG, Waldron A (2001a) Chapter 4: Structure of the cattle production sector. In ‘Beef in China: Agribusiness Opportunities and Challenges’. (Eds JW Longworth, CG Brown, A Waldron) pp. 73–122. (University of Queensland Press: St Lucia)
Longworth JW, Brown CG, Waldron A (2001b) Chapter 5: Economics of unspecialised household cattle production. In ‘Beef in China: Agribusiness Opportunities and Challenges’. (Eds JW Longworth, CG Brown, A Waldron) pp. 95–122. (University of Queensland Press. St Lucia)
Luibrand A (2001) Ten years of Doi Moi: wow did the Black Thai participate in the rural reform process in Vietnam? PhD Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Maltsoglou I, Rapsomanikies G (2005) ‘The contribution of livestock to household income in Vietnam: a household typology base analysis. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative (PPLPI).’ Working Paper No. 21 – a living from livestock. (FAO: Rome)
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) ‘Generalized linear models.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall: London)
Millar J, Photakoun V (2008) Livestock development and poverty alleviation: revolution or evolution for upland livelihoods in Lao PDR? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 6, 89–102.
| Livestock development and poverty alleviation: revolution or evolution for upland livelihoods in Lao PDR?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Minot N, Baulch B (2005) Spatial patterns of poverty in Vietnam and their implications for policy. Food Policy 30, 461–475.
| Spatial patterns of poverty in Vietnam and their implications for policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MOLISA (2008) Ministy of Labour – Invalids and social affairs. Available at http://www.molisa.gov.vn [Accessed 1 October 2008]
Neef A, Friederichsen RJ, Sangkapitux C, Thac NT (2003) Sustainable livelihoods in mountainous regions of northern Vietnam: from technology-oriented to people centred concepts. In ‘Proceedings of the III symposium on MMSEA landscapes of diversity: Indigenous knowledge, sustainable livelihoods and resource governance in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia’. (Eds Xu Jianchu, S Mieksell) pp. 495–506. (Lijiang, People’s Republic of China. Yunnan Science and Technology Press: Kunming)
Ørskov ER (1999) New challenges for livestock research and production in Asia. Outlook on Agriculture 28, 179–185.
| New challenges for livestock research and production in Asia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ouma EA, Obare GA, Staal SJ (2003) Cattle as assets: assessment of non-market benefits from cattle in smallholder Kenyan crop-livestock systems. In ‘Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists (IAAE), 16–22 August 2003. Durban, South Africa’. Available at http://purl.umn.edu/25895 [Verified 28 November 2012]
Pandey S, Minh DV (1998) A socio-economic analysis of rice production systems in the uplands of northern Vietnam. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 70, 249–258.
| A socio-economic analysis of rice production systems in the uplands of northern Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pedan A (2001) Analysis of count data using the SAS system. In ‘Proceedings of the 26th annual SAS Users Group international conference’. Paper 247-26. Available at http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p247-26.pdf [Verified 28 November 2012]
Perkins J (2002) Profitable beef cattle development in Vietnam. Briefing paper. Project review and final workshop 13–15 May 2002, Hanoi, Vietnam. ACIAR project AS2/97/18.
Piepho HP, Kalka E (2003) Threshold models with fixed and random effects for ordered categorical data. Food Quality and Preference 14, 343–357.
| Threshold models with fixed and random effects for ordered categorical data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Piepho HP, Buechse A, Emrich K (2003) A hitchhiker’s guide to mixed models for randomized experiments. Journal Agronomy & Crop Science 189, 310–322.
| A hitchhiker’s guide to mixed models for randomized experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ravallion M, Chen S, Sangraula P (2008) Dollar a day revisited. Policy Research Working Paper 4620. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Rota A, Sidahmed A (2010) ‘Livestock planning, challenges and strategies for livestock development in IFAD.’ IFAD’s Livestock Position Paper. (The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): Rome, Italy)
Rueda BL, Blake RW, Nicholson CF, Fox DG, Pell AN, Fernandes ECM, Valentim JF, Carneiro JC (2003) Production and economic potential of cattle in pasture-based systems of the western Amazon region of Brazil. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2923–2937.
Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T, Jutzi S (2006) Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 25, 505–516.
Swain RB, Sanh NV, Tuan VV (2008) Microfinance and poverty reduction in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. African and Asian Studies 7, 191–215.
| Microfinance and poverty reduction in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tra HTH (2011) Beef cattle systems and sustainable agriculture – measuring sustainable cattle systems in the Northern Mountainous Region of Vietnam. PhD dissertation. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Tulachan PM, Saleem MMA, Maki-Hokkonen J, Partap T (2000) ‘Contribution of livestock to mountain livelihoods. Research and development issues.’ (International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development: Kathmandu, Nepal)
Tung DX (1999) Roles of livestock on smallholder farming systems in northern provinces of Vietnam. MSc. Thesis, Centre for International Environment and Development Studies Noragric, Agricultural University of Norway, Aas, Norway.
Valle Zárate A (1996) Breeding strategies for marginal regions in the tropics and subtropics. Animal Research and Development 43/44, 101–118.
Valle Zárate A (2000) Livestock biodiversity in the mountains/highlands opportunities and threats. In ‘Contribution of livestock to mountain livelihoods: research and development issues’. (Eds PM Tulachan, MA Mohamed Saleem, J Maki-Hokkonen, T Partap) pp. 71–82. (International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development: Kathmandu)
Van DTT, Zeller M (2010) Development of operational poverty indicators in Northern Vietnam. In ‘International Symposium for Sustainable Land Use and Rural Development in Mountainous Regions of Southeast Asia, Hanoi, July 21–23, 2010’. Available at https://www.uni-hohenheim.de/sfb564/uplands2010/presentations/145.pdf [Verified 28 November 2012]
van de Walle D, Gunewardena D (2001) Sources of ethnic inequality in Vietnam. Journal of Development Economics 65, 177–207.
| Sources of ethnic inequality in Vietnam.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Winter WH, Doyle PT (2008) Increased profitability and social outcomes from livestock in smallholder crop-livestock systems in developing countries: the ACIAR experience. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 799–805.
| Increased profitability and social outcomes from livestock in smallholder crop-livestock systems in developing countries: the ACIAR experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
World Bank (2005) The 2005 International Comparison Program. Available at http://www.siteresources.worldbank.org/ICPINT/Resources/icp-final-tables.pdf [Accessed 1 October 2008]
