The allometric relationship between clean mohair growth and the fleece-free liveweight of Angora goats is affected by liveweight change
B. A. McGregor A B F , K. L. Butler C and M. B. Ferguson D EA Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.
B Formerly Livestock Production Sciences, Future Farming Systems Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, Attwood, Vic. 3049, Australia.
C Biometrics Unit, Future Farming Systems Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia.
D The New Zealand Merino Company Ltd, PO Box 25160, Christchurch 8024, New Zealand.
E Formerly, Livestock Production Sciences, Future Farming Systems Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: bruce.mcgregor@deakin.edu.au
Animal Production Science 53(2) 154-162 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12070
Submitted: 25 February 2012 Accepted: 30 July 2012 Published: 13 December 2012
Abstract
Clean fleece weight (CFWt) is affected by liveweight and change in liveweight in Merino sheep, Angora and cashmere goats. However, how these relationships progress as animals age has not been elucidated. Measurements were made over 12 shearing periods on a population of Angora goats representing the current range and diversity of genetic origins including South African, Texan and interbred admixtures of these and Australian sources. Records of breed, sire, dam, date of birth, dam age, birthweight, birth parity, weaning weight, liveweight, fleece growth and fleece quality were taken for does and castrated males (wethers) (n = 267 animals). Fleece-free liveweights (FFLwt) were determined for each goat at shearing time by subtracting the greasy fleece weight from the liveweight recorded immediately before shearing. The average of the FFLwt at the start of the period and the FFLWt at the end of the period was calculated (AvFFLwt). Liveweight change (LwtCh) was the change in FFLwt over the period between shearings. A restricted maximum likelihood model was developed for CFWt, after log10 transformation, which allowed the observations of the same animal at different ages to be correlated in an unstructured manner. A simple way of describing the results is: CFWt = κ (AvFFLwt)β, where κ is a parameter that can vary in a systematic way with shearing age, shearing treatment and LwtCh; and β is an allometric coefficient that only varies with LwtCh. CFWt was proportional to FFLwt0.67 but only when liveweight was lost at the rate of 5–10 kg during a shearing interval of 6 months. The allometric coefficient declined to 0.3 as LwtCh increased from 10 kg loss to 20 kg gain during a shearing interval. A consequence is that, within an age group of Angora goats, the largest animals will be the least efficient in converting improved nutrition to mohair.
References
Allden WG (1969) The summer nutrition of weaner sheep: the voluntary food intake, body weight change and wool production of sheep grazing the mature herbage of sown pasture in relation to the intake of dietary energy under a supplementary feeding regime. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 499–512.| The summer nutrition of weaner sheep: the voluntary food intake, body weight change and wool production of sheep grazing the mature herbage of sown pasture in relation to the intake of dietary energy under a supplementary feeding regime.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Allden WG (1979) Feed intake, diet composition and wool growth. In ‘Physiological and environmental limitations to wool growth’. (Eds JL Black, PJ Reis) pp. 61–78. (University of New England Publishing: Armidale)
Black JL (1987) Mechanisms controlling the rate of growth, composition and morphology of wool. In ‘Merino improvement programs in Australia’. (Ed. BJ McGuirk) pp. 457–480. (Australian Wool Corporation: Melbourne)
Cottle D (Ed.) (2010) ‘International sheep and wool handbook.’ (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK)
Ferguson KA (1962) The relation between the responses of wool growth and body weight to changes in feed intake. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 720–731.
Ferguson MB, McGregor BA (2004) An evaluation of Angora sires through progeny testing – a progress report. South African Journal of Animal Science 34, 7–9. http://www.sasas.co.za/journal/843
Ferguson MB, McGregor BA (2005) ‘Selecting high performing Angoras.’ RIRDC Research Report No. 05/141. (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Barton, ACT) Available at https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/05-141 [Verified 12 April 2011]
Gall C (1981) ‘Goat production.’ (Academic Press: London)
Gifford DR, Ponzoni RW, Lampe RJ, Burr J (1991) Phenotypic and genetic parameters of fleece traits and live weight in South Australian Angora goats. Small Ruminant Research 4, 293–302.
| Phenotypic and genetic parameters of fleece traits and live weight in South Australian Angora goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huisman AE, Brown DJ (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between bodyweight traits and other traits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1186–1193.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between bodyweight traits and other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hynd PI (1994) Follicular determinants of the length and diameter of wool fibres. I. Comparison of sheep differing in fibre length/diameter ratio at two levels of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1137–1147.
| Follicular determinants of the length and diameter of wool fibres. I. Comparison of sheep differing in fibre length/diameter ratio at two levels of nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IWTO (2006) ‘IWTO-19. Determination of wool base and vegetable matter base of core samples of raw wool.’ (International Wool Textile Organisation: Ilkley, UK)
Margolena LA (1974) ‘Mohair histogenesis, maturation and shedding in the Angora goat.’ Technical Bulletin 1945. (United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC)
McGregor BA (1992a) The effect of supplementary feeding, seasonal pastoral conditions and live weight on cashmere production and quality. Small Ruminant Research 8, 107–119.
| The effect of supplementary feeding, seasonal pastoral conditions and live weight on cashmere production and quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGregor BA (1992b) Body composition, body condition scores and carcass and organ components of grazing Angora goats. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 19, 273–276.
McGregor BA (2005) ‘Nutrition and management of goats in drought.’ Research Report No. 05/188. (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Barton, ACT) Available at https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/05-188 [Verified 12 April 2011]
McGregor BA (2010a) The influence of stocking rate and mixed grazing of Angora goats and Merino sheep on animal and pasture production in southern Australia. 3. Mohair and wool production and quality. Animal Production Science 50, 168–176.
| The influence of stocking rate and mixed grazing of Angora goats and Merino sheep on animal and pasture production in southern Australia. 3. Mohair and wool production and quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGregor BA (2010b) The influence of stocking rate and mixed grazing of Angora goats and Merino sheep on animal and pasture production in southern Australia. 2. Live weight, body condition, carcass yield and mortality. Animal Production Science 50, 149–157.
| The influence of stocking rate and mixed grazing of Angora goats and Merino sheep on animal and pasture production in southern Australia. 2. Live weight, body condition, carcass yield and mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGregor BA, Butler KL (2008a) The effect of frequency and timing of shearing on the growth of fibre and objective and subjective attributes of Angora goat fleeces. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 351–361.
McGregor BA, Butler KL (2008b) The effect of body condition score, live weight, stocking rate and grazing system on the mortality from hypothermia of Angora goats and the application of results in the assessment of welfare risks to individual and flocks of Angora goats. Australian Veterinary Journal 86, 12–17.
| The effect of body condition score, live weight, stocking rate and grazing system on the mortality from hypothermia of Angora goats and the application of results in the assessment of welfare risks to individual and flocks of Angora goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7htl2ntA%3D%3D&md5=cd9a76b6411a6f28ea03a99b3e766ac6CAS |
McGregor BA, Butler KL (2011) The relationship between permanent incisor wear and mohair production and attributes in grazing adult Angora goats. Small Ruminant Research 100, 37–43.
| The relationship between permanent incisor wear and mohair production and attributes in grazing adult Angora goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGregor BA, Butler KL, Ferguson MB (2012) The allometric relationship between mean fibre diameter of mohair and the fleece-free live weight of Angora goats over their lifetime. Animal Production Science 52, 35–43.
| The allometric relationship between mean fibre diameter of mohair and the fleece-free live weight of Angora goats over their lifetime.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicoll GB, Bigham ML, Alderton MJ (1989) Estimates of environmental effects and genetic parameters for live weights and fleece traits of Angora goats. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 49, 183–189.
Pattie WA, Williams AJ (1967) Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep 3. Maintenance requirements and the efficiency of conversion of feed to wool in mature ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 7, 117–125.
| Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep 3. Maintenance requirements and the efficiency of conversion of feed to wool in mature ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Payne RW (Ed.) (2010) ‘The guide to GenStat; release 13. Part 2: statistics.’ (VSN International: Hertfordshire, UK)
SCA (1990) ‘Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock: ruminants.’ (Standing Committee on Agriculture, CSIRO: Melbourne)
Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984) ‘Scaling: why is animal size so important?’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Sharkey MJ, Hedding RR (1964) The relationship between changes in bodyweight and wool production in sheep at different stocking rates on annual pastures in southern Victoria. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 5, 284–290.
Shelton M, Bassett JW (1970) ‘Estimate of certain genetic parameters relating to Angora goats.’ Texas Agricultural Station Research Reports (PR-2750), 38–41. (Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University: College Station, TX)
Snyman MA, Olivier JJ (1996) Genetic parameters for body weight, fleece weight and fibre diameter in South African Angora goats. Livestock Production Science 47, 1–6.
| Genetic parameters for body weight, fleece weight and fibre diameter in South African Angora goats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson JM, Barlow R (1986) The relationship between feeding and growth parameters and biological efficiency in cattle and sheep. Proceedings 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 11, 271–282.
Turner HN (1959) Ratios as criterion for selection in animal or plant breeding with particular reference to efficiency of feed conversion in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 565–580.
| Ratios as criterion for selection in animal or plant breeding with particular reference to efficiency of feed conversion in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yalçin BC, Ariturk E, Imeryuz F, Sincer N, Muftuoglu S (1979) Genetic and environmental aspects of Angora goat production. 2. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for the important production traits. Instanbul University Vet. Fak. Derg. 5, 19–34.
