Intraspecific phenotypic variation in deer: the role of genetic and epigenetic processes
Werner T. Flueck A B C and Jo Anne M. Smith-Flueck B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A National Council of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Swiss Tropical Institute, University Basel, Switzerland; C.C. 592, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.
B Institute of Natural Resources Analysis – Patagonia, Universidad Atlantida Argentina; C.C. 592, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.
C Corresponding author. Email: wtf@deerlab.org
Animal Production Science 51(4) 365-374 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10169
Submitted: 7 September 2010 Accepted: 28 January 2011 Published: 8 April 2011
Abstract
Intraspecific phenotypic variation (PV) in deer is common, at times impressively diverse, and involves morphology, development, physiology, and behaviour. Until recently considered a nuisance in evolutionary and taxonomic studies, PV has become the primary target to study fossil and extant species. Phenotypes are traditionally interpreted to express primarily interactions of inherited genetic variants. PV certainly originates from different genotypes, but additional PV, referred to as phenotypic plasticity (PP), results from gene expression responsive to environmental conditions and other epigenetic factors. Usage of ‘epigenetics’ for PP has increased exponentially with 20 316 published papers (Web-of-Science 1990 – May 2010), yet it does not include a single paper on cervids (1900 to the present). During the ‘genomic era’, the focus was on the primary DNA sequences and variability therein. Recently however, several higher order architectural genomic features were detected which all affect PV.
(1) Genes: poli-genic traits; pleiotropic genes; poli-allelic genes; gene dosage (copy number variants, CNV); single nucleotide variance in coding and gene regulatory regions; mtDNA recombinations and paternal mtDNA inheritance.
(2) Gene products: pleiotropic gene products; multiple protein structures through alternative splicing; variable gene product reactions due to gene dosage.
(3) Gene expression: (i) epigenetic regulation at the DNA, nucleosomal and chromosomal levels; (ii) large-scale genomic structural variation (i.e. CNV imbalance); (iii) transcription factor proteins (TF), each regulating up to 500 target genes, with TF activity varying 7.5–25% among individual humans (exceeding variation in coding DNA by 300–1000×); (iv) non-protein-coding RNA (98.5% of genome) constituting maybe hundreds of thousands RNA signals; (v) gene expression responsive to external and internal environmental variation; (vi) transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (e.g. from ubiquitous non-gametic interactions, genomic imprinting, epistasis, transgenerational gene–diet interactions); (vii) epigenetic stochasticity resulting in random PP. A unique example of labile traits in mammals is the yearly regrowth of a complete appendage, the antler in cervids.
Highly complex assortments of genotypes lead to a spectrum of phenotypes, yet the same spectrum can result if a single genotype generates highly complex assortments of epigenotypes. Although DNA is the template for the DNA–RNA–protein paradigm of heredity, it is the coordination and regulation of gene expression that results in wide complexity and diversity seen among individual deer, and per-generation variety of phenotypes available for selection are greater than available genotypes. In conclusion, epigenetic processes have fundamental influences on the great intraspecific PV found in deer, which is reflected in broad ranges of environmental conditions under which they can persist. Deer management and conservation of endangered cervids will benefit from appreciating the large inherent PV among individuals and the immense contribution of epigenetics in all aspects of deer biology and ecology.
Additional keywords: adaptation, cervids, evolution, gene expression.
References
[1] Putman R, Flueck WT. Intraspecific variation in biology and ecology of deer: magnitude and causation. Anim Prod Sci 2011; 51 271–91.| Intraspecific variation in biology and ecology of deer: magnitude and causation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Lessells CM. Neuroendocrine control of life histories: what do we need to know to understand the evolution of phenotypic plasticity? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2008; 363 1589–98.
| Neuroendocrine control of life histories: what do we need to know to understand the evolution of phenotypic plasticity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Feinberg AP. Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease. Nature 2007; 447 433–40.
| Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17522677PubMed |
[4] Lloyd EA, Gould SJ. Species selection on variability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90 595–9.
| Species selection on variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11607352PubMed |
[5] Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M. Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol Lett 2008; 11 106–15.
| 18021243PubMed |
[6] Mihlbachler MC. Species level revision of North American rhinos rectifies a century of poor taxonomy. J Mamm Evol 2007; 14 61–4.
| Species level revision of North American rhinos rectifies a century of poor taxonomy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Pigliucci M. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol Evol 2005; 20 481–6.
| Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16701424PubMed |
[8] Goldberg AD, Allis CD, Bernstein E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell 2007; 128 635–8.
| Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17320500PubMed |
[9] Carroll SB. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008; 134 25–36.
| Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18614008PubMed |
[10] Whitelaw E, Martin DIK. Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals. Nat Genet 2001; 27 361–5.
| Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11279513PubMed |
[11] Petronis A. Epigenetics and twins: three variations on the theme. Trends Genet 2006; 22 347–50.
| Epigenetics and twins: three variations on the theme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16697072PubMed |
[12] Nadeau JH. Transgenerational genetic effects on phenotypic variation and disease risk. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18 R202–10.
| Transgenerational genetic effects on phenotypic variation and disease risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19808797PubMed |
[13] Stearns SC. The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscience 1989; 39 436–45.
| The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Brommer JE. The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. J Evol Biol 2007; 20 831–44.
| The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17465894PubMed |
[15] Ito Y. Trends in recent research of epigenetics, a biological mechanism that regulates gene expression. Science & Technology Trends. Q Rev DC Nurses Assoc 2009; 33 11–24.
[16] Hopkin K. The evolving definition of a gene. Bioscience 2009; 59 928–31.
| The evolving definition of a gene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, et al Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 2005; 15 1034–50.
| Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16024819PubMed |
[18] Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Lyle R, Scamuffa N, et al Numerous potentially functional but non-genic conserved sequences on human chromosome 21. Nature 2002; 420 578–82.
| Numerous potentially functional but non-genic conserved sequences on human chromosome 21.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12466853PubMed |
[19] Mattick JS, Makunin IV. Small regulatory RNAs in mammals. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14 R121–32.
| Small regulatory RNAs in mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15809264PubMed |
[20] Powledge TM. Epigenetics and development. Bioscience 2009; 59 736–41.
| Epigenetics and development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Begun DJ, Holloway AK, Stevens K, Hillier LW, et al Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol 2007; 5 e310
| Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17988176PubMed |
[22] Kasowski M, Grubert F, Heffelfinger C, Hariharan M, et al Variation in transcription factor binding among humans. Science 2010; 328 232–5.
| Variation in transcription factor binding among humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20299548PubMed |
[23] Eichler EE, Flint J, Gibson G, Kong A, et al Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11 446–50.
| Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20479774PubMed |
[24] Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10 155–9.
| Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19188922PubMed |
[25] Pigliucci M. Genotype-phenotype mapping and the end of the ‘genes as blueprint’ metaphor. Philosophical Transactons of the Royal Society B 2010; 365 557–66.
| Genotype-phenotype mapping and the end of the ‘genes as blueprint’ metaphor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Glazier AM, Nadeau JH, Aitman TJ. Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science 2002; 298 2345–9.
| Finding genes that underlie complex traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12493905PubMed |
[27] Roff DA. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Q Rev Biol 1996; 71 3–35.
| The evolution of threshold traits in animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Johnson T, Keightley PD. Quantitative genetics: resolving wing shape genes. Curr Biol 2000; 10 R113–5.
| Quantitative genetics: resolving wing shape genes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10679319PubMed |
[29] Yang Q, Khoury MJ, Friedman JM, Little J, Flanders WD. How many genes underlie the occurrence of common complex diseases in the population? Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34 1129–37.
| How many genes underlie the occurrence of common complex diseases in the population?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16043441PubMed |
[30] Schenk PM, Kazan K, Wilson I, Anderson JP, et al Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 11655–60.
| Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11027363PubMed |
[31] Blumenfeld OO, Patnaik SK. Allelic genes of blood group antigens: a source of human mutations and cSNPs documented in the Blood Group Antigen Gene Mutation Database. Hum Mutat 2004; 23 8–16.
| Allelic genes of blood group antigens: a source of human mutations and cSNPs documented in the Blood Group Antigen Gene Mutation Database.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14695527PubMed |
[32] Mangum CP, Hochachka PW. New directions in comparative physiology and biochemistry: mechanisms, adaptations, and evolution. Physiol Zool 1998; 71 471–84.
| 9754524PubMed |
[33] Cheung JC, Deber CM. Misfolding of the Cystic Fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and disease. Biochemistry 2008; 47 1465–73.
| Misfolding of the Cystic Fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18193900PubMed |
[34] Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, et al Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006; 444 444–54.
| Global variation in copy number in the human genome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17122850PubMed |
[35] Check Hayden E. Life is complicated. Nature 2010; 464 664–7.
| Life is complicated.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20360709PubMed |
[36] Tsaousis AD, Martin DP, Ladoukakis ED, Posada D, Zouros E. Widespread recombination in published animal mtDNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 2005; 22 925–33.
| Widespread recombination in published animal mtDNA sequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15647518PubMed |
[37] Bromham L, Eyre-Walker A, Smith NH, Maynard Smith J. Mitochondrial Steve: paternal inheritance of mitochondria in humans. Trends Ecol Evol 2003; 18 2–4.
| Mitochondrial Steve: paternal inheritance of mitochondria in humans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Schwartz M, Vissing J. New patterns of inheritance in mitochondrial disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 310 247–51.
| New patterns of inheritance in mitochondrial disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14521902PubMed |
[39] Mate ML, Di Rocco F, Zambelli A, Vidal-Rioja L. Mitochondrial heteroplasmy in control region DNA of South American camelids. Small Rumin Res 2007; 71 123–9.
| Mitochondrial heteroplasmy in control region DNA of South American camelids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Zhao X, Li N, Guo W, Hu X, et al Further evidence for paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in the sheep (Ovis aries). Heredity 2004; 93 399–403.
| Further evidence for paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in the sheep (Ovis aries).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15266295PubMed |
[41] Richards EJ. Inherited epigenetic variation – revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 2006; 7 395–401.
| Inherited epigenetic variation – revisiting soft inheritance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16534512PubMed |
[42] Sachser N, Kaiser S. The social modulation of behavioural development. In: Kappeler P, editor. Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 505–536.
[43] Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 2007; 447 396–8.
| Perceptions of epigenetics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17522671PubMed |
[44] Suter MA, Aagaard-Tillery KM. Environmental influences on epigenetic profiles. Semin Reprod Med 2009; 27 380–90.
| Environmental influences on epigenetic profiles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19711248PubMed |
[45] Sinha A. Not in their genes: phenotypic flexibility, behavioural traditions and cultural evolution in wild bonnet macaques. J Biosci 2005; 30 51–64.
| Not in their genes: phenotypic flexibility, behavioural traditions and cultural evolution in wild bonnet macaques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15824441PubMed |
[46] Youngson NA, Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008; 9 233–57.
| Transgenerational epigenetic effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18767965PubMed |
[47] Jablonka E, Raz G. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 2009; 84 131–76.
| Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19606595PubMed |
[48] Obendorf PJ, Oxnard CE, Kefford BJ. Are the small human-like fossils found on Flores human endemic cretins? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2008; 275 1287–96.
[49] Bocock PN, Aagaard-Tillery KM. Animal models of epigenetic inheritance. Semin Reprod Med 2009; 27 369–79.
| Animal models of epigenetic inheritance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19711247PubMed |
[50] Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, et al Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 10604–9.
| Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16009939PubMed |
[51] Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 2007; 447 425–32.
| Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17522676PubMed |
[52] Surani MA. Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic inheritance. Nature 2001; 414 122–8.
| Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic inheritance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11689958PubMed |
[53] Archer GS, Dindot S, Friend TH, Walker S, et al Hierarchical phenotypic and epigenetic variation in cloned swine. Biol Reprod 2003; 69 430–6.
| Hierarchical phenotypic and epigenetic variation in cloned swine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12700187PubMed |
[54] Vogt G, Huber M, Thiemann M, van den Boogaart G, Schmitz OJ, Schubart CD. Production of different phenotypes from the same genotype in the same environment by developmental variation. J Exp Biol 2008; 211 510–23.
| Production of different phenotypes from the same genotype in the same environment by developmental variation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18245627PubMed |
[55] Li C, Yang F, Suttie J. Stem cells, stem cell niche and antler development. Anim Prod Sci 2011; 51 267–76.
| Stem cells, stem cell niche and antler development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[56] Bubenik AB, Pavlansk R. Trophic responses to trauma in growing antlers. J Exp Zool 1965; 159 289–302.
| Trophic responses to trauma in growing antlers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 5883952PubMed |
[57] Bubenik GA. The role of the nervous system in the growth of antlers. In: Bubenik GA, Bubenik AB, editors. Horns, pronghorns, and antlers. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990. pp. 339–58.
[58] Wolf M, Sander van Doorn G, Leimar O, Weissing FJ. Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature 2007; 447 581–5.
| Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17538618PubMed |
[59] Dupont C, Armant R, Brenner CA. Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin Reprod Med 2009; 27 351–7.
| Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19711245PubMed |
[60] Johannes F, Porcher E, Teixeira FK, Saliba-Colombani V, et al Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PLoS Genet 2009; 5 e1000530
| Assessing the impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19557164PubMed |
[61] Brennecke J, Malone CD, Aravin AA, Sachidanandam R, Stark A, Hannon GJ. An epigenetic role for maternally inherited piRNAs in transposon silencing. Science 2008; 322 1387–92.
| An epigenetic role for maternally inherited piRNAs in transposon silencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19039138PubMed |
[62] Thomsen PD. Genomic imprinting – an epigenetic regulation of fetal development and loss. Acta Vet Scand 2007; 49 S7
| Genomic imprinting – an epigenetic regulation of fetal development and loss.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[63] Pigliucci M, Kaplan J. The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol Evol 2000; 15 66–70.
| The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10652558PubMed |
[64] Rotilio G, Marchese E. Nutritional factors in human dispersals. Ann Hum Biol 2010; 37 312–24.
| Nutritional factors in human dispersals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20374040PubMed |
[65] Li WH, Gu Z, Wang H, Nekrutenko A. Evolutionary analyses of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409 847–9.
| Evolutionary analyses of the human genome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11237007PubMed |
[66] Perez-Enciso M, Ferretti L. Massive parallel sequencing in animal genetics: wherefroms and wheretos. Anim Genet 2010; 41 561–9.
| Massive parallel sequencing in animal genetics: wherefroms and wheretos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20477787PubMed |
[67] Ashworth CJ, Dwyer CM, McEvoy TG, Rooke JA, Robinson JJ. The impact of in utero nutritional programming on small ruminant performances. Options Méditerranéennes Série A 2009; 85 337–49.
[68] Symonds MW, Sebert SP, Budge H. Nutritional regulation of fetal growth and implications for productive life in ruminants. Animal 2010; 4 1075–83.
| Nutritional regulation of fetal growth and implications for productive life in ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[69] Singh K, Erdman RA, Swanson KM, Molenaar AJ, Maqbool NJ, Wheeler TT, et al Epigenetic regulation of milk production in dairy cows. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2010; 15 101–12.
| Epigenetic regulation of milk production in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20131087PubMed |
[70] Wilson AJ, Nussey DH. What is individual quality? An evolutionary perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 2010; 25 207–14.
| What is individual quality? An evolutionary perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19897275PubMed |
[71] Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, et al Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 2007; 447 1107–11.
| Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17597758PubMed |
[72] van Noordwijk AJ. Reaction norms in genetical ecology. Bioscience 1989; 39 453–8.
| Reaction norms in genetical ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[73] Kellermann V, van Heerwaarden B, Sgr CM, Hoffmann AA. Fundamental evolutionary limits in ecological traits drive Drosophila species distributions. Science 2009; 325 1244–6.
| Fundamental evolutionary limits in ecological traits drive Drosophila species distributions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19729654PubMed |
[74] Drake AG, Klingenberg CP. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am Nat 2010; 175 289–301.
| Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20095825PubMed |
[75] West-Eberhard MJ. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1989; 20 249–78.
| Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[76] Geist V. Deer of the world. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books; 1998.
[77] Thornburg BG, Gotea V, Makalowski W. Transposable elements as a significant source of transcription regulating signals. Gene 2006; 365 104–10.
| Transposable elements as a significant source of transcription regulating signals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16376497PubMed |
[78] Feschotte C. Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9 397–405.
| Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18368054PubMed |
