Roadkill mitigation: trialing virtual fence devices on the west coast of Tasmania
Samantha Fox A B D , Joanne M. Potts C , David Pemberton A and Dale Crosswell AA Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
B Toledo Zoo, 2605 Broadway, Toledo, OH 43609, USA.
C The Analytical Edge Pty Ltd, PO Box 47, Blackmans Bay, Tas. 7052, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: samantha.fox@dpipwe.tas.gov.au
Australian Mammalogy 41(2) 205-211 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM18012
Submitted: 8 April 2018 Accepted: 4 November 2018 Published: 28 November 2018
Abstract
Wildlife roadkill is a worldwide issue being tackled using several mitigation methods that have variable efficacy. Tasmania has a significant roadkill issue, and several endemic species that are vulnerable to roadkill. Virtual fence devices are manufactured in Austria and were originally designed to mitigate against the impact of vehicles hitting large game species such as deer and boar. Here, we trial the devices over three years at a single site in Tasmania to determine whether they are effective in reducing roadkill of Tasmanian mammal species. While there was no spatial replication in this trial, a reduction in total roadkill rate, and in the most commonly affected species, by 50% suggests that these devices have enormous potential to substantially reduce roadkill rates. Many unique mammal species no longer found in the wild on mainland Australia are still found in Tasmania, making mitigating roadkill hotspots an important conservation tool to help maintain presence of these species in their last remaining stronghold. Road managers, including councils, in other Australian States that suffer from high rates of wildlife roadkill may benefit from the knowledge of the results of this trial.
Additional keywords: anthropogenic impacts, conservation, management strategies, threatened species.
References
Bager, A., and Fontoura, V. (2013). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a wildlife roadkill mitigation system in wetland habitat. Ecological Engineering 53, 31–38.| Evaluation of the effectiveness of a wildlife roadkill mitigation system in wetland habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cramer, P., Olsson, M., Gadd, M. E., van der Ree, R., and Sielecki, L. E. (2015). Transportation and large herbivores. In ‘Handbook of Road Ecology’. 1st edn. (Eds R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, and C. Grilo.) pp. 344–352. (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)
D’Angelo, G., and van der Ree, R. (2015). Use of reflectors and auditory deterrents to prevent wildlife–vehicle collisions. In ‘Handbook of Road Ecology’. 1st edn. (Eds R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, and C. Grilo.) pp. 213–218. (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)
Forman, R. T. T., and Alexander, L. E. (1998). Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 207–231.
| Roads and their major ecological effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hawkins, C. E., Baars, C., Hesterman, H., Hocking, G. J., Jones, M. E., Lazenby, B., Mann, D., Mooney, N., Pemberton, D., Pyecroft, S., Restani, M., and Wiersma, J. (2006). Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. Biological Conservation 131, 307–324.
| Emerging disease and population decline of an island endemic, the Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobday, A. J. (2010). Nighttime driver detection distances for Tasmanian fauna: informing speed limits to reduce roadkill. Wildlife Research 37, 265–272.
| Nighttime driver detection distances for Tasmanian fauna: informing speed limits to reduce roadkill.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hobday, A. J., and Minstrell, M. L. (2008). Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options. Wildlife Research 35, 712–726.
| Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huijser, M. P., Mosler-Berger, C., Olsson, M., and Strein, M. (2015). Wildlife warning signs and animal detection systems aimed at reducing wildlife–vehicle collisions. In ‘Handbook of Road Ecology’. 1st edn. (Eds R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, and C. Grilo.) pp. 198–212. (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)
Jones, M. E. (2000). Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils. Wildlife Research 27, 289–296.
| Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lazenby, B. T., Tobler, M. W., Bown, W. E., Hawkins, C. E., Hocking, G. J., Hume, F., Huxtable, S., Iles, P., Jones, M. E., Lawrence, C., Thalmann, S., Wise, P., Williams, H., Fox, S., and Pemberton, D. (2018). Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of devil facial tumour disease. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 1368–1379.
| Density trends and demographic signals uncover the long-term impact of devil facial tumour disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lester, D. (2015). Effective wildlife roadkill mitigation. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 3, 42–51.
| Effective wildlife roadkill mitigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Magnus, Z., Kriwoken, L., Mooney, N., and Jones, M. (2004). Reducing the incidence of wildlife roadkill: improving the visitor experience in Tasmania. Co-operative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, Gold Coast, Queensland.
Milton, S. J., Dean, W. R. J., Sielecki, L. E., and van der Ree, R. (2015). The function and management of roadside vegetation. In ‘Handbook of Road Ecology’. 1st edn. (Eds R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, and C. Grilo.) pp. 373–381. (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)
Owen, D., and Pemberton, D. (2011). ‘Tasmanian Devil: A Unique and Threatened Animal.’ (Allen and Unwin.)
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and Environment for statistical computing. (R Core Team: Vienna). Available at: http://www.R-project.org/
Rytwinski, T., Soanes, K., Jaeger, J. A. G., Fahrig, L., Findlay, C. S., Houlahan, J., van der Ree, R., and van der Grift, E. A. (2016). How effective is road mitigation at reducing road-kill? A meta-analysis. PLoS One 11, e0166941.
| How effective is road mitigation at reducing road-kill? A meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seiler, A., and Helldin, J. O. (2006). Mortality in wildlife due to transportation. In ‘The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobility for the Environment’. (Eds J. Davenport, and J. L. Davenport.) pp. 165–189. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin.)
Smith, D. J., and van der Ree, R. (2015). Field methods to evaluate the impacts of roads on wildlife. In ‘Handbook of Road Ecology’. 1st edn. (Eds R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, and C. Grilo.) pp. 82–95. (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)
van der Grift, E. A., van der Ree, R., Fahrig, L., Findlay, S., Houlahan, J., Jaeger, J. A. G., Klar, N., Madrinan, L. F., and Olson, L. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures. Biodiversity and Conservation 22, 425–448.
| Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vercayie, D., and Herremans, M. (2015). Citizen science and smartphones take roadkill monitoring to the next level. Nature Conservation 11, 29–40.
| Citizen science and smartphones take roadkill monitoring to the next level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weeks, S. (2015). Case study: the Mount Kenya elephant corridor and underpass. In ‘Handbook of Road Ecology’. 1st edn. (Eds R. van der Ree, D. J. Smith, and C. Grilo.) pp. 353–356. (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)
