Simulating wildfire spread based on continuous time series remote sensing images and cellular automata
Huajian Zhuang A B , Naian Liu A B * , Xiaodong Xie A B * , Xuan Xu A B , Mengmeng Li A B , Yang Zhang A B and Rui Wang CA
B
C
Abstract
Acquiring behaviour parameters of wildfire propagation and developing firefighting strategies necessitate a precise and efficient simulation method; fireline coordinates and rate of spread (ROS) are two crucial parameters closely associated with simulation precision.
This study proposes an adaptive simulation method for wildfire propagation by integrating continuous time series remote sensing images with a cellular automata (CA) model.
The ROS in each direction is calculated using continuous time fireline coordinates derived from multi-source remote sensing images. A time-adaptive propagation algorithm is developed based on the CA model (time-adaptive cellular automata, TCA). Vegetation distribution information is derived to establish a simulation system for verification experiments.
The TCA model demonstrated satisfactory simulation performance, with a prediction accuracy of 92.2% for burned area and 87.3% for fireline length within local regions in the MuLi Forest Fire and effectively characterised gradual spread based on low ROS.
The adaptive simulation method produces fairly precise results and demonstrated its capability to achieve localised and gradual propagation. This software serves as a powerful tool for wildland surface fire prevention and control.
The adaptive simulation method based on continuous time remote sensing images and the CA model are essential for accurately predicting wildfire propagation.
Keywords: cellular automata model, continuous-time remote sensing images, coordinates of fireline, rate of spread, simulation of wildfire propagation, simulation software, vegetation inversion, wildfire spread rules.
References
Clarke KC, Brass JA, Riggan PJ (1994) A cellular automation model of wildfire propagation and extinction. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60, 1355-1367.
| Google Scholar |
Crist MR (2023) Rethinking the focus on forest fires in federal wildland fire management: landscape patterns and trends of non-forest and forest burned area. Journal of Environmental Management 327, 116718.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cruz MG, Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Kilinc M, Sullivan AL (2021) An empirical-based model for predicting the forward spread rate of wildfires in eucalypt forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31, 81-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
De Vivo F, Battipede M, Johnson E (2021) Infra-red line camera data-driven edge detector in UAV forest fire monitoring. Aerospace Science and Technology 111, 106574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Epting J, Verbyla D, Sorbel B (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment 96, 328-339.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Garcia T, Ribeiro R, Bernardino A (2023) Wildfire aerial thermal image segmentation using unsupervised methods: a multilayer level set approach. International Journal of Wildland Fire 32, 435-447.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gharakhanlou NM, Hooshangi N (2021) Dynamic simulation of fire propagation in forests and rangelands using a GIS-based cellular automata model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 30, 652-663.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Junpen A, Garivait S, Bonnet S, Pongpullponsak A (2013) Fire spread prediction for deciduous forest fires in northern Thailand. Science Asia 39, 535-545.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McNamee M, Meacham B, van Hees P, Bisby L, Chow WK, Coppalle A, Dobashi R, Dlugogorski B, Fahy R, Fleischmann C, Floyd J, Galea ER, Collner M, Hakkarainen T, Hamins A, Hu L, Johnson P, Karlsson B, Merci B, Ohmiya Y, Rein G, Trouve A, Wang Y, Weckman B (2019) IAFSS agenda 2030 for a fire safe world. Fire Safety Journal 110, 102889.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meng Q, Huai Y, You J, Nie X (2023) Visualization of 3D forest fire spread based on the coupling of multiple weather factors. Computers & Graphics 110, 58-68.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meng S, Pang Y, Huang C, Li Z (2022) Improved forest cover mapping by harmonizing multiple land cover products over China. GIScience & Remote Sensing 59, 1570-1597.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mitchell JW (2023) Analysis of utility wildfire risk assessments and mitigations in California. Fire Safety Journal 140, 103879.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Noble IR, Gill AM, Bary GAV (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology 5, 201-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Otukei JR, Blaschke T (2010) Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 12, S27-S31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ribeiro TF, Silva F, Moreira J, Costa RL (2023) Burned area semantic segmentation: a novel dataset and evaluation using convolutional networks. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 202, 565-580.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rui X, Hui S, Yu X, Zhang G, Wu B (2018) Forest fire spread simulation algorithm based on cellular automata. Natural Hazards 91, 309-319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Russell BC, Torralba A, Murphy KP, Freeman WT (2008) LabelMe: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. International Journal of Computer Vision 77, 157-173.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sohail A (2023) Genetic algorithms in the fields of artificial intelligence and data sciences. Annals of Data Science 10, 1007-1018.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sun L, Xu C, He Y, Zhao Y, Xu Y, Rui X, Xu H (2021) Adaptive forest fire spread simulation algorithm based on cellular automata. Forest 12, 1431.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tavakol Sadrabadi M, Innocente MS (2023) Vegetation cover type classification using cartographic data for prediction of wildfire behaviour. Fire 6, 76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wang Z (1992) Current forest fire danger rating system (CFFDRS). Fire Safety Science 1, 121-125.
| Google Scholar |
Woinarski JCZ, McCormack PC, McDonald J, Legge S, Garnett ST, Wintle B, Rumpff L (2023) Making choices: prioritising the protection of biodiversity in wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 32, 1031-1038.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wu Z, Wang B, Li M, Tian Y, Quan Y, Liu J (2022) Simulation of forest fire spread based on artificial intelligence. Ecological Indicators 136, 108653.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Xu F, Chen W, Xie R, Wu Y, Jiang D (2024) Vegetation classification and a biomass inversion model for wildfires in chongli based on remote sensing data. Fire 7, 58.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhao Z, Liu Y, Zhang G, Tang L, Hu X (2022) The winning solution to the iFLYTEK challenge 2021 cultivated land extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images. In ‘Proceedings of the 2022 14th International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI)’, 15–17 July 2022, Wuhan, China. pp. 376–380. (IEEE)
Zheng Z, Huang W, Li S, Zeng Y (2017) Forest fire spread simulating model using cellular automaton with extreme learning machine. Ecological Modelling 348, 33-43.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |