Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
REVIEW (Open Access)

More smoke today for less smoke tomorrow? We need to better understand the public health benefits and costs of prescribed fire

Benjamin A. Jones https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-0143 A * , Shana McDermott B , Patricia A. Champ C and Robert P. Berrens A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 05 3060, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

B Department of Economics, Trinity University, One Trinity Place, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.

* Correspondence to: bajones@unm.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 31(10) 918-926 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22025
Submitted: 3 March 2022  Accepted: 7 August 2022   Published: 2 September 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of IAWF. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Rapidly scaling up the use of prescribed fire is being promoted as an important pathway for reducing the growing damages of wildfire events in the United States, including limiting the health impacts from smoke emissions. However, we do not currently have the science needed to understand how the health impacts associated with prescribed fire smoke in the present compare to wildfire smoke exposure in the future. In particular, we lack an understanding of how the potential long-term public health benefits of prescribed fire on future wildfire smoke and health impacts compare to prescribed fire’s short-term effects on human health. Answering the question ‘How do we learn to sustainably coexist with wildfire?’ requires a new research agenda investigating the magnitudes and distribution of the health benefits and costs associated with prescribed burning. We suggest three areas for a new research agenda: (1) improved understanding of the health costs of prescribed fire; (2) quantification of the expected health benefits of prescribed fire through possible decreased future wildfire smoke emissions; and (3) better knowledge on the distributional impacts of prescribed fire smoke. We conclude that we need to first learn to sustainably coexist with prescribed fire in order to sustainably coexist with wildfire.

Keywords: benefits of prescribed fire, benefits-costs, human health, knowledge gaps, prescribed fire, public acceptability, smoke, wildfire, wildfire management.


References

Afrin S, Garcia-Menendez F (2020) The influence of prescribed fire on fine particulate matter pollution in the Southeastern United States. Geophysical Research Letters 47, e2020GL088988
The influence of prescribed fire on fine particulate matter pollution in the Southeastern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Afrin S, Garcia-Menendez F (2021) Potential impacts of prescribed fire smoke on public health and socially vulnerable populations in a Southeastern US state. Science of The Total Environment 794, 148712
Potential impacts of prescribed fire smoke on public health and socially vulnerable populations in a Southeastern US state.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen KA, Harris MPK, Marrs RH (2013) Matrix modelling of prescribed burning in Calluna vulgaris‐dominated moorland: short burning rotations minimize carbon loss at increased wildfire frequencies. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 614–624.
Matrix modelling of prescribed burning in Calluna vulgaris‐dominated moorland: short burning rotations minimize carbon loss at increased wildfire frequencies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Association for Fire Ecology (2022) Letter to US Forest Service Chief, Randy Moore. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ea4a2778a22135afc733499/t/62a0904a6cb8a947129024a7/1654689866243/AFE_Chief_Letter_Signed.pdf [Accessed on 26 July 2022]

Blades JJ, Shook SR, Hall TE (2014) Smoke management of wildland and prescribed fire: understanding public preferences and trade-offs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44, 1344–1355.
Smoke management of wildland and prescribed fire: understanding public preferences and trade-offs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Borchers-Arriagada N, Bowman DMJS, Price O, Palmer AJ, Samson S, Clarke H, Sepulveda G, Johnston FH (2021) Smoke health costs and the calculus for wildfires fuel management: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health 5, e608–e619.
Smoke health costs and the calculus for wildfires fuel management: a modelling study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brunson MW, Evans J (2005) Badly burned? Effects of an escaped prescribed burn on social acceptability of wildland fuels treatments. Journal of Forestry 103, 134–138.

Brunson MW, Shindler BA (2004) Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society & Natural Resources 17, 661–678.
Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cascio WE (2018) Wildland fire smoke and human health. Science of the Total Environment 624, 586–595.
Wildland fire smoke and human health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies IP, Haugo RD, Robertson JC, Levin PS (2018) The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire. PLoS One 13, e0205825
The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Engebretson JM, Hall TE, Blades JJ, Olsen CS, Toman E, Frederick SS (2016) Characterizing public tolerance of smoke from wildland fires in communities across the United States. Journal of Forestry 114, 601–609.
Characterizing public tolerance of smoke from wildland fires in communities across the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 117–128.
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gabbert B (2021) Congress appropriates $3.3 billion for wildland fire. Wildfire Today. Available at https://wildfiretoday.com/2021/11/06/congress-appropriates-3-3-billion-for-wildland-fire/

Gaither CJ, Afrin S, Garcia-Menendez F, Odman MT, Huang R, Goodrick S, Ricardo da Silva A (2019) African American exposure to prescribed fire smoke in Georgia, USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 3079
African American exposure to prescribed fire smoke in Georgia, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haikerwal A, Reisen F, Sim MR, Abramson MJ, Meyer CP, Johnston FH, Dennekamp M (2015) Impact of smoke from prescribed burning: Is it a public health concern? Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 65, 592–598.
Impact of smoke from prescribed burning: Is it a public health concern?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hand M, Thacher J, McCollum D, Berrens R (2008) Forest amenities and location choice in the Southwest. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 8, 232–253.

Hiers JK, O’Brien JJ, Varner JM, Butler BW, Dickinson M, Furman J, et al. (2020) Prescribed fire science: the case for a refined research agenda. Fire Ecology 16, 11
Prescribed fire science: the case for a refined research agenda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang R, Hu Y, Russell AG, Mulholland JA, Odman MT (2019) The impacts of prescribed fire on PM2.5 air quality and human health: Application to asthma-related emergency room visits in Georgia, USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 2312
The impacts of prescribed fire on PM2.5 air quality and human health: Application to asthma-related emergency room visits in Georgia, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hunter ME, Robles MD (2020) Tamm review: The effects of prescribed fire on wildfire regimes and impacts: A framework for comparison. Forest Ecology and Management 475, 118435
Tamm review: The effects of prescribed fire on wildfire regimes and impacts: A framework for comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jaffe DA, O’Neill SM, Larkin NK, Holder AL, Peterson DL, Halofsky JE, Rappold AG (2020) Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 70, 583–615.
Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones BA, Berrens RP (2021) Prescribed burns, smoke exposure, and infant health. Contemporary Economic Policy 39, 292–309.
Prescribed burns, smoke exposure, and infant health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kolden CA (2019) We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the Western United States to mitigate wildfire risk. Fire 2, 30
We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the Western United States to mitigate wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kondo MC, Reid CE, Mockrin MH, Heilman WE, Long D (2022) Socio-demographic and health vulnerability in prescribed-burn exposed versus unexposed counties near the National Forest System. Science of the Total Environment 806, 150564
Socio-demographic and health vulnerability in prescribed-burn exposed versus unexposed counties near the National Forest System.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kupfer JA, Terando AJ, Gao P, Teske C, Hiers JK (2020) Climate change projected to reduce prescribed burning opportunities in the south-eastern United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29, 764–778.
Climate change projected to reduce prescribed burning opportunities in the south-eastern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lim SH, Bowker JM, Johnson CY, Cordell HK (2009) Perspectives on prescribed fire in the South: does ethnicity matter? Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 33, 17–24.
Perspectives on prescribed fire in the South: does ethnicity matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

List JA (2022a) The five vital signs of a scalable idea and how to avoid a voltage drop. Behavioral Scientist, 19 April 2022. Available at https://behavioralscientist.org/the-five-vital-signs-of-a-scalable-idea-and-how-to-avoid-a-voltage-drop/

List JA (2022b) ‘The Voltage Effect.’ (Penguin Books: UK)

Liu Y, Goodrick S, Achtemeier G, Jackson WA, Qu JJ, Wang W (2009) Smoke incursions into urban areas: simulation of a Georgia prescribed burn. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 336–348.
Smoke incursions into urban areas: simulation of a Georgia prescribed burn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liu JC, Wilson A, Mickley LJ, Ebisu K, Sulprizio MP, Wang Y, et al. (2017) Who among the elderly is most vulnerable to exposure to and health risks of fine particulate matter from wildfire smoke? American Journal of Epidemiology 186, 730–735.
Who among the elderly is most vulnerable to exposure to and health risks of fine particulate matter from wildfire smoke?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCaffrey S, Toman E, Stidham M, Shindler B (2012) Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 15–24.
Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Melvin M (2020) 2020 National Prescribed Fire Use Report. Technical Bulletin 04-20. (Coalition of Prescribed Fire Councils, Inc.)

Miller RK, Field CB, Mach KJ (2020) Barriers and enablers for prescribed burns for wildfire management in California. Nature Sustainability 3, 101–109.
Barriers and enablers for prescribed burns for wildfire management in California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Myers J (2021) California unveils sweeping wildfire prevention plan. The Los Angeles Times, Accessed on 16 November 2021. Available at https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-04-08/california-wildfire-prevention-536-million-newsom-lawmakers

Mylek MR, Schirmer J (2020) Understanding acceptability of fuel management to reduce wildfire risk: Informing communication through understanding complexity of thinking. Forest Policy and Economics 113, 102120
Understanding acceptability of fuel management to reduce wildfire risk: Informing communication through understanding complexity of thinking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Navarro KM, Schweizer D, Balmes JR, Cisneros R (2018) A review of community smoke exposure from wildfire compared to prescribed fire in the United States. Atmosphere 9, 185
A review of community smoke exposure from wildfire compared to prescribed fire in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

NCWFMS (2014) The National Strategy, The Final Phase in the Development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf [Accessed on 22 July 2020]

Ottmar RD, Schaaf MD, Alvarado E (1996) Smoke considerations for using fire in maintaining healthy forest ecosystems. In ‘The use of fire in forest restoration. General Technical Reports INT-GTR-341’. (Eds CC Hardy, SF Arno) pp. 24–25. (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Ogden, UT)

Penman TD, Christie FJ, Andersen AN, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Henderson MK, et al. (2011) Prescribed burning: how can it work to conserve the things we value? International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 721–733.
Prescribed burning: how can it work to conserve the things we value?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Price OF, Horsey B, Jiang N (2016) Local and regional smoke impacts from prescribed fires. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences 16, 2247–2257.
Local and regional smoke impacts from prescribed fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prunicki M, Zhou X, Nadeau K (2019) The impact of a prescribed burn versus a wildfire on the immune and cardiovascular systems of children. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 143, AB80
The impact of a prescribed burn versus a wildfire on the immune and cardiovascular systems of children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reid CE, Brauer M, Johnston FH, Jerrett M, Balmes JR, Elliott CT (2016) Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives 124, 1334–1343.
Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ryan KC, Knapp EE, Varner JM (2013) Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: History, current practice and challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11, e15–e24.
Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: History, current practice and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Santana VM, Alday JG, Lee H, Allen KA, Marrs RH (2016) Modelling carbon emissions in Calluna vulgaris–dominated ecosystems when prescribed burning and wildfires interact. PLoS One 11, e0167137
Modelling carbon emissions in Calluna vulgaris–dominated ecosystems when prescribed burning and wildfires interact.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith H (2021) Newsom signs ‘monumental’ law paving way for more prescribed burns. The Los Angeles Times. Available at https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-10-07/newsom-signs-fire-law-paving-way-for-more-prescribed-burns

Stanford University (2020) Setting Fires to Avoid Fires: Stanford Finds Approaches to Enable More Prescribed Burns. Stanford News Service, Accessed on 27 July 2020. Available at https://news.stanford.edu/press-releases/2020/01/20/setting-fires-avoid-fires/

US EPA (2021) Comparative Assessment of the Impacts of Prescribed Fire Versus Wildfire (CAIF): A Case Study in the Western US. EPA/600/R-21/044. September 2021. (US EPA Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment)

USDA Forest Service (2022) Confronting the Wildfire Crisis, A Strategy for Protecting Communities and Improving Resilience in America’s Forests. FS-1187a. Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/Confronting-Wildfire-Crisis.pdf [Accessed on 26 July 2022]

Varner JM, Hiers JK, Wheeler SB, McGuire J, Quinn-Davidson L, Palmer WE, Fowler L (2021) Increasing Pace and Scale of Prescribed Fire via Catastrophe Funds for Liability Relief. Fire 4, 77
Increasing Pace and Scale of Prescribed Fire via Catastrophe Funds for Liability Relief.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weisshaupt BR, Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Robinson WD, Jakes PJ (2005) Acceptability of smoke from prescribed forest burning in the Northern Inland West: a focus group approach. Journal of Forestry 103, 189–193.
Acceptability of smoke from prescribed forest burning in the Northern Inland West: a focus group approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wiedinmyer C, Hurteau MD (2010) Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the western United States. Environmental Science & Technology 44, 1926–1932.
Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS, Price OF, Henderson SB, Johnston FH (2016) A transdisciplinary approach to understanding the health effects of wildfire and prescribed fire smoke regimes. Environmental Research Letters 11, 125009
A transdisciplinary approach to understanding the health effects of wildfire and prescribed fire smoke regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Working Group Report to New Mexico Legislature (2020) Expanding the Use of Prescribed Fire in New Mexico. Final report as requested through House Memorial 42. (Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department: New Mexico) Available at https://nmrxfire.nmsu.edu/documents/expanding-the-use-of-prescribed-fire-in-new-mexico---june-2020.pdf

Yoder J, Tilley M, Engle D, Fuhlendorf S (2003) Economics and prescribed fire law in the United States. Review of Agricultural Economics 25, 218–233.
Economics and prescribed fire law in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yoder J, Engle D, Fuhlendorf S (2004) Liability, incentives and prescribed fire for ecosystem management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2, 361–366.
Liability, incentives and prescribed fire for ecosystem management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |