Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Using alternative soil moisture estimates in the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index

Chiara M. Holgate A B D , Albert I. J. M. van Dijk A C , Geoffrey J. Cary A C and Marta Yebra A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

C Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.

D Corresponding author: chiara.holgate@anu.edu.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(9) 806-819 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF16217
Submitted: 11 December 2016  Accepted: 12 June 2017   Published: 18 August 2017

Abstract

McArthur’s Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) incorporates the Keetch–Byram Drought Index (KBDI) estimate of soil dryness. Improved approaches for estimating soil moisture now exist, with potential for informing the calculation of FFDI. We evaluated the effect, compared with KBDI, of two alternative methods of estimating soil moisture: the rainfall-based Antecedent Precipitation Index and soil moisture from the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity satellite mission. These methods were used to calculate FFDI over a sample period of 5 years (2010–14) at seven locations around Australia. The effect of substituting the alternatives for KBDI, and of entirely replacing the Drought Factor (DF) (a measure of fuel availability in FFDI) with the alternatives was explored by studying the effect on magnitude, distribution and timing of FFDI and associated Fire Danger Rating (FDR). Both approaches predicted drier soil conditions than KBDI, resulting in fewer Low–Moderate FDR days and more days of High FDR and above. The alternative methods replacing KBDI had little effect on seasonal patterns of FDR. Of all approaches, replacing DF entirely with the soil moisture alternatives most closely mimicked McArthur’s FFDI. Overall, if alternative measures of soil moisture are adopted for FFDI, the entire replacement of the DF term should be considered.


References

Atwell BJ, Kredemann PE, Turnbull CGN (1999) ‘Plants in Action: Adaptation in Nature, Performance in Cultivation.’ (Macmillan Publishers Australia Pty Ltd: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Beringer J, Hutley LB, McHugh I, Arndt SK, Campbell D, Cleugh HA, Cleverly J, Resco de Dios V, Eamus D, Evans B, Ewenz C, Grace P, Griebel A, Haverd V, Hinko-Najera N, Huete A, Isaac P, Kanniah K, Leuning R, Liddell MJ, Macfarlane C, Meyer W, Moore C, Pendall E, Phillips A, Phillips RL, Prober SM, Restrepo-Coupe N, Rutledge S, Schroder I, Silberstein R, Southall P, Yee MS, Tapper NJ, van Gorsel E, Vote C, Walker J, Wardlaw T (2016) An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand flux tower network – OzFlux. Biogeosciences 13, 5895–5916.
An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand flux tower network – OzFlux.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bureau of Meteorology (2014) Climate classification of Australia. (Commonwealth of Australia) Available at http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/climate_averages/climate-classifications/index.jsp?maptype=kpn#maps [Verified 3 July 2017]

Cheney NP (1968) Predicting fire behaviour with fire danger tables. Australian Forestry 32, 71–79.
Predicting fire behaviour with fire danger tables.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choudhury BJ, Blanchard BJ (1983) Simulating soil water recession coefficients for agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 19, 241–247.
Simulating soil water recession coefficients for agricultural watersheds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crow WT, Bindlish R, Jackson TJ (2005) The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall-runoff partitioning. Geophysical Research Letters 32, L18401
The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall-runoff partitioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz MG, Gould JS, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, McCaw WL, Matthews S (2015) Empirical-based models for predicting head-fire rate of spread in Australian fuel types. Australian Forestry 78, 118–158.
Empirical-based models for predicting head-fire rate of spread in Australian fuel types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dowdy AJ, Mills GA, Finkele K, De Groot W (2009) Australian fire weather as represented by the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index and the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index. CAWCR Technical Report number 10, Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Finkele K, Mills GA, Beard G, Jones DA (2006) National daily gridded soil moisture deficit and drought factors for use in prediction of Forest Fire Danger Index in Australia. Bushfire CRC Research Report number 119. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at http://134.178.63.141/amm/docs/2006/finkele_hres.pdf [Verified 27 July 2017]

Gill WM, Stephens SL, Cary GJ (2013) The worldwide ‘wildfire’ problem. Ecological Applications 23, 438–454.
The worldwide ‘wildfire’ problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths D (1998) Improved formulae for the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Meter. Meteorological Note 214. Bureau of Meteorology. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Hawdon A, McJannet D, Wallace J (2014) Calibration and correction procedures for cosmic-ray neutron soil moisture probes located across Australia. Water Resources Research 50, 5029–5043.
Calibration and correction procedures for cosmic-ray neutron soil moisture probes located across Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holgate CM, De Jeu RAM, Van Dijk AIJM, Liu YY, Renzullo LJ, Vinodkumar , Dharssi I, Parinussa RM, Van Der Schalie R, Gevaert A, Walker J, McJannet D, Cleverly J, Haverd V, Trudinger CM, Briggs PR (2016) Comparison of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture data sets across Australia. Remote Sensing of Environment 186, 479–500.
Comparison of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture data sets across Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones DA, Wang W, Fawcell R (2009) High quality spatial climate data sets for Australia. Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal 58, 233–248.
High quality spatial climate data sets for Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keetch JJ, Byram GM (1968) A drought index for forest fire control. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Research Paper SE-38. (Asheville, NC, USA)

Kerr YH, Wigneron JP, Boutin J, Escorihuela MJ, Font J, Reul N, Gruhier C, Enache Juglea S, Drinkwater MR, Hahne A, Martin-Neira M, Mecklenburg S (2010) The SMOS Mission: new tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle. Proceedings of the IEEE 98, 666–687.
The SMOS Mission: new tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kohler MA, Linsley RK (1951) Predicting the runoff from storm rainfall. Research paper number 34, US Weather Bureau. (Washington, DC, USA)

Lucas C (2010) On developing a historical fire weather data-set for Australia. Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal 61, 1–14.
On developing a historical fire weather data-set for Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Commonwealth of Australia, Forest and Timber Bureau Leaflet 107. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)

McCarthy G (2003) Drought factor (fine fuel consumption) prediction from field measurement of fine fuel moisture content. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Forest Science Centre. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Merlin O, Rüdiger C, Al Bitar A, Richaume P, Walker JP, Kerr Y (2012) Disaggregation of SMOS soil moisture in southeastern Australia. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50, 1556–1571.
Disaggregation of SMOS soil moisture in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore PF (1986) Comparison of the Forest Fire Danger Meter Mk.5 and the BEHAVE fire behavior prediction system in a dry eucalypt forest. In ‘University of Montana, Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers’, Paper 1871. Available at http://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2890&context=etd [Verified 27 July 2017]

Mount AB (1972) The derivation and testing of a soil dryness index using run-off data. Tasmanian Forestry 1070 Commission Bulletin number 4. (Hobart, Tas., Australia)

Noble IR, Bary GAV, Gill AM (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology 5, 201–203.
McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nussbeck FW (2006) Assessing multimethod association with categorical variables. In ‘Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology’. (Eds M Eid, E Diener) pp. 231–247. (American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA)

Nyman P, Metzen D, Noske PJ, Lane PNJ, Sheridan GJ (2015) Quantifying the effects of topographic aspect on water content and temperature in fine surface fuel. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 1129–1142.
Quantifying the effects of topographic aspect on water content and temperature in fine surface fuel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Raaflaub L, Valeo C (2009) Hydrological properties of duff. Water Resources Research 45, W05502
Hydrological properties of duff.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith AB, Walker JP, Western AW, Young RI, Ellett KM, Pipunic RC, Grayson RB, Siriwardena L, Chiew FHS, Richter H (2012) The Murrumbidgee soil moisture monitoring network data set. Water Resources Research 48, W07701
The Murrumbidgee soil moisture monitoring network data set.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tuller M, Or D (2003) Water retention and characteristic curve. In ‘Encyclopaedia of Soils in the Environment 4’. (Ed. D Hillel) pp. 278–289. (Elsevier Ltd: Oxford, UK)

Vinodkumar , Dharssi I, Bally J, Steinle P, McJannet D, Walker J (2017) Verification of soil moisture from multiple models over Australia for fire danger rating application. Water Resources Research 53, 633–646.
Verification of soil moisture from multiple models over Australia for fire danger rating application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wain A, Kepert D (2013) A comprehensive, nationally consistent climatology of fire weather parameters. Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Walsh SF, Nyman P, Sheridan GJ, Baillie CC, Tolhurst KG, Duff TJ (2017) Hillslope-scale prediction of terrain and forest canopy effects on temperature and near-surface soil moisture deficit. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 191–208.
Hillslope-scale prediction of terrain and forest canopy effects on temperature and near-surface soil moisture deficit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |