A power series formulation for two-dimensional wildfire shapes
J. E. Hilton A C , C. Miller A and A. L. Sullivan BA CSIRO, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Vic. 3169, Australia.
B CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: james.hilton@csiro.au
International Journal of Wildland Fire 25(9) 970-979 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15191
Submitted: 28 October 2015 Accepted: 28 April 2016 Published: 5 July 2016
Abstract
Computational simulations of wildfires require a model for the two-dimensional expansion of a fire perimeter. Although many expressions exist for the one-dimensional rate of spread of a fire front, there are currently no agreed mathematical expressions for the two-dimensional outward speed of a fire perimeter. Multiple two-dimensional shapes such as elliptical and oval-shaped perimeters have been observed and reported in the literature, and several studies have attempted to classify these shapes using geometric approximations. Here we show that a two-dimensional outward speed based on a power series results in a perimeter that can match many of these observed shapes. The power series is based on the dot product between the vector normal to the perimeter and a fixed wind vector. The formulation allows the evolution and shape of a fire perimeter to be expressed using a small set of scalar coefficients. The formulation is implemented using the level set method, and computed perimeters are shown to provide a good match to perimeters of small-scale experimental fires. The method could provide a framework for statistical matching of wildfire shapes or be used to improve current wildfire prediction systems.
Additional keywords: perimeter propagation, simulation.
References
Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildland fire behaviour and effects, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-30. (Ogden, UT)Alexander ME (1985) Estimating the length to breadth ratio of elliptical forest fire patterns. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Forest and Fire Meteorology’, 29 April–2 May 1985, Detroit, MI. Society of American Foresters, pp. 287–304. Available at http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/?id=11401 [Verified 26 May 2016]
Anderson DH, Catchpole EA, de Mestre NJ, Parkes T (1982) Modelling the spread of grass fires. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society 23, 451–466.
| Modelling the spread of grass fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baudrier E, Nicolier F, Millon G, Ruan S (2008) Binary-image comparison with local-dissimilarity quantification. Pattern Recognition 41, 1461–1478.
| Binary-image comparison with local-dissimilarity quantification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bradski G (2000) ‘The OpenCV library.’ Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools. Available at http://www.drdobbs.com/open-source/the-opencv-library/184404319 [Verified 26 May 2016]
Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 1–13.
| Prediction of fire spread in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Anderson WR (2012) Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 280, 120–131.
| Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cruz MG, Gould JS, Kidnie S, Bessell R, Nichols D, Slijepcevic A (2015a) Effects of curing on grassfires: II. Effect of grass senescence on the rate of fire spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 838–848.
| Effects of curing on grassfires: II. Effect of grass senescence on the rate of fire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cruz MG, Gould JS, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, McCaw WL, Matthews S (2015b) Empirical-based models for predicting head-fire rate of spread in Australian fuel types. Australian Forestry 78, 118–158.
| Empirical-based models for predicting head-fire rate of spread in Australian fuel types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Curry JR, Fons WL (1938) Rate of spread of surface fires in the ponderosa pine type of California. Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 239–267.
Curry JR, Fons WL (1940) Forest-fire behaviour studies. Mechanical Engineering 62, 219–225.
Di Gesù V, Starovoitov V (1999) Distance-based functions for image comparison. Pattern Recognition Letters 20, 207–214.
| Distance-based functions for image comparison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire area simulator–model development and evaluation, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)
Finney MA (2004) FARSITE: Fire area simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRSRP-4 (revised) (Ogden, UT)
Hilton JE, Miller C, Sullivan AL, Rucinski C (2015) Effects of spatial and temporal variation in environmental conditions on simulation of wildfire spread. Environmental Modelling & Software 67, 118–127.
| Effects of spatial and temporal variation in environmental conditions on simulation of wildfire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnston P, Kelso J, Milne GJ (2008) Efficient simulation of wildfire spread on an irregular grid. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 614–627.
| Efficient simulation of wildfire spread on an irregular grid.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Loncaric S (1998) A survey of shape analysis techniques. Pattern Recognition 31, 983–1001.
| A survey of shape analysis techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. Commonwealth Department of National Development Forestry and Timber Bureau, Leaflet 100, Canberra, ACT.
McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests, Commonwealth Department of National Development Forestry and Timber Bureau, Leaflet 107, Canberra, ACT.
Miller C, Hilton JE, Sullivan AL, Prakash M (2015) SPARK – a bushfire spread prediction tool. In ‘Environmental Software Systems. Infrastructures, Services and Applications’, Vol. 448 of the series IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Available at http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-15994-2_26 [Verified 26 May 2016]
Peet GB (1967) The shape of mild fires in jarrah forest. Australian Forestry 31, 121–127.
| The shape of mild fires in jarrah forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richards GD (1990) An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 30, 1163–1179.
| An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richards GD (1995) A general mathematical framework for modelling two-dimensional wildland fire spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire 5, 63–72.
| A general mathematical framework for modelling two-dimensional wildland fire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rochoux MC, Emery C, Ricci S, Cuenot B, Trouve A (2015) Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread Part II: Ensemble Kalman filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 15, 1721–1739.
| Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread Part II: Ensemble Kalman filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment, Research Paper INT-115 (Ogden, UT).
Sethian JA (1999) ‘Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Sethian JA (2001) Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts. Journal of Computational Physics 169, 503–555.
| Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktlOjs7g%3D&md5=ab7c7612a1a87c76ad58e3163524c585CAS |
Sethian JA, Smereka P (2003) Level set methods for fluid interfaces. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 35, 341–372.
| Level set methods for fluid interfaces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sullivan AL (2009a) Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-physical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 349–368.
| Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-physical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sullivan AL (2009b) Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 369–386.
| Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sullivan AL (2009c) Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 3: Simulation and mathematical analogue models. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 387–403.
| Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 3: Simulation and mathematical analogue models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sullivan AL (2009d) Improving operational models of fire behaviour. In ‘Combined IMACS World Conference/Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (MSSANZ)/18th Biennial Conference on Modelling and Simulation’. 13–17 July, Cairns, Australia. (Eds RS Anderssen, RD Braddock, LTH Newham) pp. 282–288. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (Canberra, ACT)
Sullivan AL, Knight IK, Hurley RJ, Webber C (2013) A contractionless, low-turbulence wind tunnel for the study of free-burning fires. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 44, 264–274.
| A contractionless, low-turbulence wind tunnel for the study of free-burning fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sullivan AL, Sharples JJ, Matthews S, Plucinski MP (2014) A downslope fire spread correction factor based on landscape-scale fire behaviour. Environmental Modelling & Software 62, 153–163.
| A downslope fire spread correction factor based on landscape-scale fire behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sussman M, Smereka P, Osher S (1994) A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. Journal of Computational Physics 114, 146–159.
| A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tolhurst K, Shields B, Chong D (2008) Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 47–54.
Tymstra C, Bryce RW, Wotton BM, Taylor SW, Armitage OB (2010) Development and structure of Prometheus: the Canadian wildland fire growth simulation model, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR-X-417, (Edmonton, AB).
Van Wagner CE (1969) A simple fire-growth model. Forestry Chronicle 1, 103–104.
Zahn C, Roskies R (1972) Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 21, 269–281.
Zhang D, Lu G (2004) Review of shape representation and description techniques. Pattern Recognition 37, 1–19.
| Review of shape representation and description techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |