Modern calibration and historical testing of small-area, fire-interval reconstruction methods
Alexa J. Dugan A and William L. Baker A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Geography, Department 3371, 1000 East University Avenue, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: bakerwl@uwyo.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 23(1) 58-68 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12162
Submitted: 1 October 2012 Accepted: 31 July 2013 Published: 18 October 2013
Abstract
Accuracy of small-area, fire-interval estimation methods has been inadequately assessed, thus we conducted modern calibration and historical testing of the traditional composite-fire-interval and a newer all-tree-fire-interval method for estimating population mean fire intervals. We tested in eight areas, at four scales, using 30 small plots across ponderosa pine forests on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park. In modern calibration, individual-plot all-tree-fire-intervals were equal to population mean fire intervals in all plots. Across the eight areas, a mean-plot version of the all-tree-fire-interval method never failed, whereas mean-plot versions of composite-fire-intervals failed in 37.5–100% of areas. Pooled composite-fire-intervals, the traditional method, failed in all subareas. In historical testing, pooled and mean-plot all-tree-fire-interval methods and two variations of a mean-plot composite-fire-interval method had the lowest mean relative errors. Again, pooled composite-fire-intervals performed poorly across the eight areas. Overall, in modern and historical tests, the mean-plot all-tree-fire-interval method outperformed all others, but highly filtered mean-plot composite-fire-intervals were fairly accurate in historical tests. Both could be reliable methods, if replicated in small plots averaged over 600–1000-ha landscapes, but for small areas, the all-tree-fire-interval method outperformed others. However, for general use, there may be more value in spatially explicit, landscape-scale methods, rather than any small-area method.
Additional keywords: all-tree-fire-interval, composite-fire-interval, fire history.
References
Agee JK (1993) ‘Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)Anderson MF (1998) ‘Living at the Edge: Explorers, Exploiters and Settlers of the Grand Canyon Region.’ (Grand Canyon Association: Grand Canyon, AZ)
Anderson MF (2000) ‘Polishing the Jewel: an Administrative History of Grand Canyon National Park.' (Grand Canyon Association: Grand Canyon, AZ)
Arno SF, Petersen TD (1983) Variation in estimates of fire intervals: a closer look at fire history on the Bitterroot National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-301. (Ogden, UT)
Arno SF, Sneck KM (1977) A method for determining fire history in coniferous forests of the mountain West. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report INT-42. (Ogden, UT)
Baker WL (2009) ‘Fire Ecology in Rocky Mountain Landscapes’. (Island Press: Washington, DC)
Baker WL, Dugan AD (2013) Fire-history implications of fire-scarring. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 43,
Baker WL, Ehle DS (2001) Uncertainty in surface-fire history: the case of ponderosa pine forests in the western United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1205–1226.
| Uncertainty in surface-fire history: the case of ponderosa pine forests in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baker WL, Shinneman DJ (2004) Fire and restoration of pinyon-juniper woodlands in the western United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 189, 1–21.
| Fire and restoration of pinyon-juniper woodlands in the western United States: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barrett SW, Arno SF (1988) Increment-borer methods for determining fire history in coniferous forests. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-244. (Ogden, UT)
Dieterich JH (1980) The composite fire method – a tool for more accurate interpretation of fire history. In ‘Proceedings of the Fire History Workshop’, 20–24 October 1980, Tucson. AZ. (Eds MA Stokes, JH Dieterich) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report RM-81, pp. 8–14. (Fort Collins, CO)
Dugan AJ (2012) A landscape fire history and a modern calibration of fire-interval methods in a ponderosa pine forest across the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park. MA Thesis, University of Wyoming. (Laramie, WY).
Duhnkrack JS (1982) Fire regime analysis of the ponderosa pine forest at the Grandview monocline on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. MSc Thesis, Western Washington University. (Bellingham, WA)
Farris CA, Baisan CH, Falk DA, Yool SR, Swetnam TW (2010) Spatial and temporal corroboration of a fire-scar-based fire history in a frequently burned ponderosa pine forest. Ecological Applications 20, 1598–1614.
| Spatial and temporal corroboration of a fire-scar-based fire history in a frequently burned ponderosa pine forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20945762PubMed |
Fowler A (2002) XMATCH02: an interactive tree-ring crossdating program. Department of Geography, University of Auckland, Occasional Paper 38. (Auckland, New Zealand)
Fulé PZ, Heinlein TA, Covington WW, Moore MM (2003) Assessing fire regimes on Grand Canyon landscapes with fire-scar and fire-record data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 129–145.
| Assessing fire regimes on Grand Canyon landscapes with fire-scar and fire-record data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grissino-Mayer HD (1995) Tree-ring reconstructions of climate and fire history of El Malpais National Monument, New Mexico. PhD Thesis, The University of Arizona. (Tucson, AZ)
Gutsell SL, Johnson EA (1996) How fire scars are formed: coupling a disturbance process to its ecological effect. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26, 166–174.
| How fire scars are formed: coupling a disturbance process to its ecological effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hessl A, Miller J, Kernan J, Keenum D, McKenzie D (2007) Mapping paleo-fire boundaries from binary point data: comparing interpolation methods. The Professional Geographer 59, 87–104.
| Mapping paleo-fire boundaries from binary point data: comparing interpolation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43, 69–75.
Hughes JD (1978) ‘In the House of Stone and Light: a Human History of the Grand Canyon.’ (Grand Canyon Natural History Association: Grand Canyon, AZ)
Kou X, Baker WL (2006a) A landscape model quantifies error in reconstructing fire history from scars. Landscape Ecology 21, 735–745.
| A landscape model quantifies error in reconstructing fire history from scars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kou X, Baker WL (2006b) Accurate estimation of mean fire interval for managing fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 489–495.
| Accurate estimation of mean fire interval for managing fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laughlin DC, Grace JB (2006) A multivariate model of plant species richness in forested systems: old-growth montane forests with a long history of fire. Oikos 114, 60–70.
McBride JR (1983) Analysis of tree rings and fire scars to establish fire history. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43, 51–67.
Norton DA, Palmer JG, Ogden J (1987) Dendroecological studies in New Zealand; 1. An evaluation of tree age estimates based on increment cores. New Zealand Journal of Botany 25, 373–383.
| Dendroecological studies in New Zealand; 1. An evaluation of tree age estimates based on increment cores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Odion DC, Tyler C (2002) Are long fire-free periods needed to maintain the endangered fire-recruiting shrub Arctostaphylos morroensis (Ericaceae)? Conservation Ecology 6, 4
Ott L (1988) ‘An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis’, 3rd edn. (PWS-Kent Publishing Company: Boston, MA)
Parsons RA, Heyerdahl EK, Keane RE, Dorner B, Fall J (2007) Assessing accuracy of point fire intervals across landscapes with simulation modeling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37, 1605–1614.
| Assessing accuracy of point fire intervals across landscapes with simulation modeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Romme WH (1980) Fire history terminology: report of the ad hoc committee. In ‘Proceedings of the Fire History Workshop’ (Eds MA Stokes and JH Dierterich) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report RM-81, pp. 135–140. (Fort Collins, CO)
SAS Institute (2008) ‘SAS Procedures Guide Version 9’, 2nd edn. (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)
Shapiro-Miller LB, Heyerdahl EK, Morgan P (2007) Comparison of fire scars, fire atlases, and satellite data in the northwestern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37, 1933–1943.
| Comparison of fire scars, fire atlases, and satellite data in the northwestern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1968) ‘An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)
Swetnam TW, Baisan CH (1996) Historical fire regime patterns in the southwestern United States since 1700 AD. In ‘Fire Effects in Southwestern Forests: Proceedings of the Second La Mesa Fire Symposium’. (Ed CD Allen) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RM-GTR-286, pp. 11–32. (Fort Collins, CO)
Tiedemann AR, Klemmedson JO, Bull EL (2000) Solution of forest health problems with prescribed fire: are forest productivity and wildlife at risk? Forest Ecology and Management 127, 1–18.
| Solution of forest health problems with prescribed fire: are forest productivity and wildlife at risk?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
US Geological Survey, National Gap Analysis Program (2004) Provisional Digital Land Cover Map for the Southwestern United States. Version 1.0. RS/GIS Laboratory, College of Natural Resources, Utah State University. (Logan, UT)
USDI National Park Service (2009) ‘Final environmental impact statement and assessment of effect: fire management plan, volume 1.’ (Grand Canyon National Park: Grand Canyon, AZ)
USDI National Park Service (2012) ‘Grand Canyon National Park Fire Management Plan.’ (Grand Canyon National Park: Grand Canyon, AZ)
Van Horne ML, Fulé PZ (2006) Comparing methods of reconstructing fire history using fire scars in a southwestern United States ponderosa pine forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36, 855–867.
| Comparing methods of reconstructing fire history using fire scars in a southwestern United States ponderosa pine forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vankat JL (2011) Post-1935 changes in forest vegetation of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Part 1 – Ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management 261, 326–341.
| Post-1935 changes in forest vegetation of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Part 1 – Ponderosa pine forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams MA, Baker WL (2013) Variability of historical forest structure and fire across ponderosa pine landscapes of the Coconino Plateau and south rim of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology 28, 297–310.
| Variability of historical forest structure and fire across ponderosa pine landscapes of the Coconino Plateau and south rim of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
