Safety climate in the US federal wildland fire management community: influences of organisational, environmental, group and individual characteristics
Anne E. Black A C and Brooke Baldauf McBride BA Human Factors & Risk Management Research, Development and Application, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 East Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801, USA.
B College of Forestry and Conservation, The University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: aeblack@fs.fed.us
International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(6) 850-861 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12154
Submitted: 8 August 2012 Accepted: 17 January 2013 Published: 6 May 2013
Abstract
This study examined the effects of organisational, environmental, group and individual characteristics on five components of safety climate (High Reliability Organising Practices, Leadership, Group Culture, Learning Orientation and Mission Clarity) in the US federal wildland fire management community. Of particular interest were differences between perceptions based on respondents’ Incident Position. Those in supervisory positions at the ground level (Type 1 Firefighters) and those at the top (Incident Commanders and operational leads) scored significantly higher than did mid-level supervisors (Single Resource, Division Supervisors, Task Force and Strike Team Leads). This was particularly the case for High Reliability Organising Practices, which measure the degree of communication among and between units, and Group Culture, which measures the tightness of a group and the degree of psychological safety felt by members. Both components directly affect the amount and type of information flowing within and between incident units. That the critical middle links in incident organisation perceive these essential safety-related functions to be significantly lower than do individuals at other levels provides a startling empirical insight into, and powerful leverage for further improving, incident operations and resulting safety outcomes.
Additional keywords: high reliability organisation (HRO), incident, operations, safety culture.
References
Barton M, Sutcliffe KM (2008) Mindfulness as an organizational capability: evidence from wildland firefighting. Revue Für Postheroisches Management 3, 24–35.Black AE, Sutcliffe KM, Barton M, Dether D (2008) Assessing high reliability practices in the wildland fire community. Fire Management Today 68, 45–48.
Cooper MD (2000) Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science 36, 111–136.
| Towards a model of safety culture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dether D, Black AE (2006) Learning from escaped prescribed fires – lessons for high reliability. Fire Management Today 66, 50–56.
Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 350–383.
| Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FEMA Emergency Management Institute (2012) Unit 4: Incident Commander and command staff functions. (Federal Emergency Management Agency: Emitsburg, MD) Available at http://training.fema.gov/EMIweb/IS/ICS100CR/ICS100Vis/04ICS100Command_NMSept05.pdf [Verified 30 October 2012]
Field A (2009) ‘Understanding Statistics Using SPSS’. (Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA)
Goleman D (2006) ‘Social Intelligence: the New Science of Human Relationships.’ (Bantam Dell: New York)
Guldenmund FW (2000) The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety Science 34, 215–257.
| The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hoy WK, Miskel CG (1982) ‘Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice’. (Random House: New York)
Isla Díaz RT, Cabrera DD (1997) Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organization safety. Accident; Analysis and Prevention 29, 643–650.
| Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organization safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knotek K, Watson AE (2006) Organizational characteristics that contribute to success in engaging the public to accomplish fuels management at the wilderness/non-wilderness interface. In ‘Fuels Management – How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings’, 28 March–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Eds PL Andrews, BW Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 703–713. (Fort Collins, CO)
Lewis AB (2008) Safety in wildland fire: leadership and employee voice. MSc thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow.
Lewis A, Hall TE, Black A (2011) Career stages in wildland firefighting: implications for voice in risky situations. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 115–124.
| Career stages in wildland firefighting: implications for voice in risky situations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2011) National interagency incident management system: wildland fire qualification system guide. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Operations and Workforce Development Committee, Publication PMS 310-1. Available at http://www.nwcg.gov/pms/docs/pms310-1.pdf [Verified 18 June 2012]
Putnam T (1996) Findings from the Wildland Firefighters Human Factors Workshop. Part 1. USDA Forest Service, Technology and Development Program, Technical Report 9551–2855-MTDC. (Missoula, MT)
Sutcliffe KM (2011) High reliability organizations (HROs). Best Practice & Clinical Anaesthesiology 25, 133–144.
| High reliability organizations (HROs).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas DA, Black AE, Dether D, Hetts K, Dueitt M (2007) The Jungle Prescribed Fire review: an experiment in learning. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2007_thomas_d001.pdf. [Verified 30 October 2012]
USDI–USDA (2006a) Wildland Fire Use Implementation Procedures Reference Guide. May 2005, Minor Revisions March and April 2006. US Department of Interior–US Department of Agriculture. (Boise, ID)
USDI–USDA (2006b) Interagency Prescribed Fire Planning and Implementation Reference Guide. September 2006. US Department of Interior–US Department of Agriculture. (Boise, ID).
Useem M, Cook J, Sutton L (2005) Developing leaders for decision making under stress: wildland firefighters in the South Canyon Fire and its aftermath. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4, 461–485.
| Developing leaders for decision making under stress: wildland firefighters in the South Canyon Fire and its aftermath.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vogus RJ, Sutcliffe KM (2007) The impact of safety organizing, trusted leadership, and care pathways on reported medication errors in hospital nursing units. Medical Care 45, 997–1002.
| The impact of safety organizing, trusted leadership, and care pathways on reported medication errors in hospital nursing units.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2007) ‘Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty’, 2nd edn. (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ)
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2008) Organizing for higher reliability: lessons learned from wildland firefighters. Fire Management Today 68, 14–19.
Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943.
| Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XotFCitbo%3D&md5=308417c344ec067b31725c73724340afCAS | 16825536PubMed |
Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center (2006) White paper: where to next with HRO? (Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center: Tucson, AZ). Available at http://wildfirelessons.net/HRO.aspx [Verified 30 October 2012]
Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E (2005) Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Quality & Safety in Health Care 14, 303–309.
| Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvhsVWgtw%3D%3D&md5=b27b96612f302af42926315eb2d3d467CAS |
Wright V (2010) Influences to the success of fire science delivery: perspectives of potential fire/fuels science users. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Final Report to the Joint Fire Science Program, JFSP Project #04–4-2–01. (Missoula, MT) Available at http://www.firescience.gov/projects/04-4-2-01/project/04-4-2-01_vw_jfsp_final_report.pdf [Verified 30 October 2012]
Wu T-C, Liu C-W, Lu M-C (2007) Safety climate in university and college laboratories: impact of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Safety Research 38, 91–102.
| Safety climate in university and college laboratories: impact of organizational and individual factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17303169PubMed |
