Assessing the exposure of the built environment to potential ignition sources generated from vegetative fuel
J. L. Beverly A B , P. Bothwell A , J. C. R. Conner A and E. P. K. Herd AA Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320-122 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6H 3S5, Canada.
B Corresponding author. Email: jbeverly@nrcan.gc.ca
International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(3) 299-313 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09071
Submitted: 8 July 2009 Accepted: 13 January 2010 Published: 13 May 2010
Abstract
We assessed the exposure of the built environment to potential ignition sources generated from vegetative fuel for four communities in the province of Alberta, Canada. Ignition processes generated by burning vegetation that were included in the analysis were radiant heat, short-range spotting, and longer-range spotting. Results were used to map the boundaries of the wildland–urban interface and to delineate zones within each community that identify the degree to which these areas represent potential wildfire entry-points into the wildland–urban interface. The assessment method can be used to set priorities for mitigation activities; compare conditions within and between communities and over time; and identify priority areas for time- and resource-intensive site assessments that are often completed for individual structures located in the wildland–urban interface. We compared results among the four case-study communities and demonstrated an application of the approach for evaluating community fuel treatment plans. Factors that influenced the exposure of the built environment to potential ignition sources differed among the communities, which suggested the need for community-specific mitigation strategies. Spatial patterns of areas with elevated ignition exposure reflected not only the amount of ignition-producing vegetation around the built environment, but also the size and arrangement of fuel patches in relation to the unique morphology of the community and the occurrence of occluded interface zones.
Additional keywords: community, defensible space, fire behaviour, fire management, FireSmart, FireWise, wildland–urban interface.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta (FRIAA) and was completed in partnership with Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Millar Western Forest Products Inc. Valuable information and expertise regarding the analysis of Swan Hills fuel treatments were provided by K. MacDonald (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development). We thank M. E. Alexander (Canadian Forest Service) and K. Quintilio (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development) for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Agee JK , Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 83–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alexander ME , Thomas DA (2003) Wildland fire behaviour case studies and analyses: other examples, methods, reporting standards, and some practical advice. Fire Management Today 63(4), 4–12.
Beverly JL, Herd EPK , Conner JCR (2009) Modeling fire susceptibility in west central Alberta, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1465–1478.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carmel Y, Paz S, Johashan F , Shoshany M (2009) Assessing fire risk using Monte Carlo simulations of fire spread. Forest Ecology and Management 257, 370–377.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Forestry 102, 15–21.
Dickson BG, Prather JW, Xu Y, Hampton HM, Aumack EN , Sisk TD (2006) Mapping the probability of large fire occurrence in northern Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology 21, 747–761.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Krawchuk MA, Cumming SG, Flannigan MD , Wein RW (2006) Biotic and abiotic regulation of lightning fire initiation in the mixedwood boreal forest. Ecology 87, 458–468.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR , Yang JC (2006a) On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire and Materials 30, 77–87.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Porterie B, Zekri N, Clerc J-P , Loraud J-C (2005) Influence des brandons sur la propagation d’un feu de forêt. Comptes Rendus Physique 6, 1153–1160.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Snellen D, Borgers A , Timmermans H (2002) Urban form, road network type, and mode choice for frequently conducted activities: a multi-level analysis using quasi-experimental design data. Environment & Planning A 34, 1207–1220.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Talberth J, Berrens RP, McKee M , Jones M (2006) Averting and insurance decisions in the wildland–urban interface: implications of survey and experimental data for wildfire risk reduction policy. Contemporary Economic Policy 24, 203–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
USDA and Department of the Interior (2001) Urban wildland interface communities within the vicinity of federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Federal Register 66, 751–754.
Wilson AAG , Ferguson IS (1986) Predicting the probability of house survival during bushfires. Journal of Environmental Management 23, 259–270.
Winter G , Fried JS (2000) Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface. Society & Natural Resources 13, 33–49.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |