Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mesoscale model simulation of the meteorological conditions during the 2 June 2002 Double Trouble State Park wildfire

Joseph J. Charney A C and Daniel Keyser B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A USDA Forest Service, 1407 S. Harrison Road, Room 220, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA.

B Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: jcharney@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(4) 427-448 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08191
Submitted: 22 November 2008  Accepted: 14 August 2009   Published: 24 June 2010

Abstract

On the morning of 2 June 2002, an abandoned campfire grew into a wildfire in the Double Trouble State Park in east-central New Jersey, USA. The wildfire burned 526 ha (1300 acres) and forced the closure of the Garden State Parkway for several hours due to dense smoke. In addition to the presence of dead and dry fuels due to a late spring frost prior to the wildfire, the meteorological conditions at the time of the wildfire were conducive to erratic fire behaviour and rapid fire growth. Observations indicate the occurrence of a substantial drop in relative humidity at the surface accompanied by an increase in wind speed in the vicinity of the wildfire during the late morning and early afternoon of 2 June. The surface drying and increase in wind speed are hypothesised to result from the downward transport of dry, high-momentum air from the middle troposphere occurring in conjunction with a deepening mixed layer. This hypothesis is addressed using a high-resolution mesoscale model simulation to document the structure and evolution of the planetary boundary layer and lower-tropospheric features associated with the arrival of dry, high-momentum air at the surface coincident with the sudden and dramatic growth of the wildfire.

Additional keywords: fire weather, fire-weather forecasting.


Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Research Joint Venture Agreement 03-JV-11231300-101 between the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, and the University at Albany, State University of New York. The authors thank Xindi Bian and Lesley Fusina for their help in preparing mesoscale simulations of the DTSP wildfire event. Horace Somes and John Hom were instrumental in obtaining the New Jersey Forest Fire Service (2003) fire report. The aerial photograph of the fire reproduced in Fig. 2 was provided by Bert Plante of the NJFFS.


References


Black TL (1994) The new NMC mesoscale Eta model: description and forecast examples. Weather and Forecasting  9, 265–278.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Byram GM (1954) Atmospheric conditions related to blowup fires. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Station Paper 35. (Asheville, NC) [Reprinted as: National Fire Equipment System Publication, NFES 2239 by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. (Boise, ID)]

Charney JJ, Bian X, Potter BE, Heilman WE (2003) Mesoscale simulations during the Double Trouble State Park wildfire in east-central New Jersey on June 2, 2002. In ‘Preprints of the 10th conference on mesoscale processes’, 23–27 June 2003, Portland, OR. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Chen F , Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Review  129, 569–585.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fahnestock GR (1965) Texas forest fires in relation to weather and other factors. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, Research Paper SO-16. (Asheville, NC)

Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1995) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-398+STR. (Boulder, CO)

Haines DA (1988) A lower atmosphere severity index for wildland fires. National Weather Digest  13, 23–27.
Hardy CC, Ottmar RD, Peterson JL, Core JE, Seamon P (2001) Smoke management guide for prescribed and wildland fire. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, PMS 420-2, NFES 1279. (Boise, ID)

Heilman WE, Potter BE, Charney JJ, Bian X (2003) National Fire Plan – Eastern Area Modeling Consortium: research, product development, and partnerships. In ‘Preprints of the 5th symposium on fire and forest meteorology’, 17–20 November 2003, Orlando, FL. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Janjić ZI (1990) The step-mountain coordinate: physical package. Monthly Weather Review  118, 1429–1443.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | New Jersey Forest Fire Service (2003) Division forest firewardens report of large fire and problem fire analysis: Jakes Branch wildfire. New Jersey Forest Fire Service, B06-02-02. (New Lisbon, NJ)

Reisner J, Rasmussen RM , Bruintjes RT (1998) Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society  124, 1071–1107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Simard AJ, Eenigenburg JE, Hobrla SL (1987) Predicting extreme fire potential. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 21–24 April 1987, San Diego, CA. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Zhong S, In H-J, Bian X, Charney J, Heilman W , Potter B (2005) Evaluation of real-time high-resolution MM5 predictions over the Great Lakes region. Weather and Forecasting  20, 63–81.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zimet T, Martin JE , Potter BE (2007) The influence of an upper-level frontal zone on the Mack Lake wildfire environment. Meteorological Applications  14, 131–147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |




1 UTC = EDT + 4 h, where EDT (Eastern Daylight Time) corresponds to local time at the fire location.