Flammability descriptors of fine dead fuels resulting from two mechanical treatments in shrubland: a comparative laboratory study
Eva Marino A C , Javier Madrigal A , Mercedes Guijarro A , Carmen Hernando A , Carmen Díez A and Cristina Fernández BA Centro de Investigación Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, E-28040 Madrid, Spain.
B Centro de Investigación Forestal de Lourizán, Consellería de Medio Rural, Xunta de Galicia, E-36080 Pontevedra, Spain.
C Corresponding author. Email: emarino@inia.es
International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(3) 314-324 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08123
Submitted: 14 July 2008 Accepted: 23 September 2009 Published: 13 May 2010
Abstract
Mechanical treatments are traditionally used to modify the fuel complex in shrubland, but information about their actual effectiveness in reducing the risk of wildfire initiation is scarce. The effects of two mechanical fuel treatments (shrub clearing with crushing and manual removal) on flammability in a shrubland community in north-western Spain were compared. Three months after treatment, laboratory tests using a point-ignition source were conducted on the fine dead fuels to analyse the effect of type of treatment and fuel moisture content (FMC) under two conditions: (1) flaming; or (2) glowing+wind ignition source. Fuel load effect within each treatment was also studied. Time-to-ignition, flaming duration, number of burnt sides of the sample and fuel consumption ratio were assessed. Logistic models were developed to assess ignition and sustained combustion probabilities. Type of treatment and FMC significantly affected flammability under both experimental conditions tested. Slow smouldering was observed in fuels subjected to shrub clearing and removal, whereas crushing fuels were rapidly burnt with flaming phase combustion. In general, shrub clearing and removal appeared to be more effective in reducing wildfire hazard in these shrubland communities.
Additional keywords: fuel management, Galicia (north-western Spain), ignition, mixed heathland, shrub clearing, sustained combustion.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and co-funded by FEDER funds through Project RTA05–00244-C02–02, and by the European Commission, through the Integrated Project FIRE PARADOX FP6–018505. Eva Marino’s participation in this research was possible through a PhD scholarship funded by INIA. We are grateful to Antonio Arellano from the Departamento de Protección Ambiental, CIF-Lourizán, for field assistance. We sincerely acknowledge the critical reviews of three anonymous referees who helped improve an early version of the manuscript.
Agee JK , Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 83–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Busse MD, Hubbert KR, Fiddler GO, Shestak CJ , Powers RF (2005) Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 267–276.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dibble AC, White RH , Lebow PK (2007) Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter: invasive versus non-invasive plants. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 426–443.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fernandes PM, Botelho H, Rego F , Loureiro C (2008) Using fuel and weather variables to predict the sustainability of surface fire spread in maritime pine stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38, 190–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frandsen WH (1987) The influence of moisture and mineral soil on the combustion limits of smouldering forest duff. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17, 1540–1544.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Glitzenstein JS, Streng DR, Achtemeier GL, Naeher LP , Wade DD (2006) Fuels and fire behaviour in chipped and unchipped plots: implications for land management near the wildland/urban interface. Forest Ecology and Management 236, 18–29.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeley JE (2002) Fire management of California shrubland landscapes. Environmental Management 29(3), 395–408.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Lin CC (1999) Modeling probability of ignition in Taiwan red pine forests. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 14(3), 339–344.
Martinson EJ , Omi PN (2008) Assessing mitigation of wildfire severity by fuel treatments – an example from the Coastal Plain of Mississippi. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 415–420.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miyanishi K , Johnson EA (2002) Process and patterns of duff consumption in the mixedwood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 1285–1295.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Plucinski MP , Anderson WR (2008) Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 628–637.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens SL (1998) Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management 105, 21–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens SL , Moghaddas JJ (2005) Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behaviour, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 21–36.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tanskanen H, Venäläinen A, Puttonen P , Granström A (2005) Impact of stand structure on surface fire ignition potential in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris forests in southern Finland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35, 410–420.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vélez R (1990) La sylviculture préventive des incendies en Espagne. Revue Forestiére Française XLII(numéro special), 320–331.
| Crossref |