Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterization of wildfire regimes in Canadian boreal terrestrial ecosystems

Yueyang Jiang A E , Qianlai Zhuang B , Mike D. Flannigan C and John M. Little D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

B Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

C Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St East, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.

D Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320-122 Street, Edmonton, AB, T5H 3S5, Canada.

E Corresponding author. Email: jiang5@purdue.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(8) 992-1002 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08096
Submitted: 8 June 2008  Accepted: 30 April 2009   Published: 9 December 2009

Abstract

Wildfire is a major disturbance in boreal terrestrial ecosystems. Characterizing fire regimes and projecting fire recurrence intervals for different biomes are important in managing those ecosystems and quantifying carbon dynamics of those ecosystems. This study used Canadian wildfire datasets, 1980–1999, to characterize relationships between number of fires and burned area for 13 ecozones and to calculate wildfire recurrence intervals in each ecozone. For the study period, wildfires were found to follow power–law relationships between frequency densities (number of fires normalized to unit bins) and burned areas in all ecozones. Power–law frequency–area relationships also held for both anthropogenic fires and natural fires in the 1980s and 1990s. For each Canadian ecozone using the parameters of the power–law frequency–area distributions, fire recurrence intervals were then calculated for wildfires equal to or larger than a given size of burned area. Fire recurrence intervals ranged from 1 to 32 years for burned areas >2 km2, and from 1 to 100 years for burned areas >10 km2 in every 10 000-km2 spatial area for each ecozone. The information obtained through characterizing the wildfires and the fire recurrence intervals calculated in this study will provide guidance to wildfire risk managers throughout Canada. The findings of this study will also be a benefit to future efforts in quantifying carbon dynamics in Canadian boreal terrestrial ecosystems.

Additional keywords: carbon dynamics, ecozone, fire management, power–law frequency–area statistics, recurrence interval.


Acknowledgements

The wildfire databases used are courtesy of the Canadian provincial, territorial and federal fire management agencies. We acknowledge Dr B. D. Malamud and another anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to have Brenda Laishley’s editorial comments. This research is supported by NSF Arctic System Science Program (project ARC-0554811) and NSF Carbon and Water in the Earth Program (project EAR-0630319).


References


Acton FS (1966) ‘Analysis of Straight-Line Data.’ (Dover: New York)

Amiro BD, Chen JM , Liu J (2000) Net primary productivity following forest fire for Canadian ecoregions Canadian Journal of Forest Research  30, 939–947.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ecological Stratification Working Group (1996) A national ecological framework for Canada, Agriculture and Agric.-Food Canada and Environment Canada. (Ottawa, ON)

Fiorucci P, Gaetani F , Minciardi R (2008) Regional partitioning for wildfire regime characterization. Journal of Geophysical Research  113, F02013.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Flannigan MD, Little J (2002) ‘Canadian Large Fire Database, 1959–1999 point data set.’ (Canadian Forest Service: Edmonton, AB)

Flannigan MD, Bergeron Y, Engelmark O , Wotton BM (1998) Future wildfire in circumboreal forests in relation to global warming. Journal of Vegetation Science  9, 469–476.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McCarthy MA, Gill AM (1997) Fire modeling and biodiversity. In ‘Frontiers in Ecology: Building the Links – Proceedings of the 1997 Conference of the Ecological Society of Australia’, 1–3 October 1997, Albury, Australia. (Eds N Klomp, I Lunt) pp. 79–88. (Elsevier: Oxford, UK)

Millington JDA, Perry GLW, Malamud BD (2006) Models, data and mechanisms: quantifying wildfire regimes. In ‘Fractal Analysis for Natural Hazards’. (Eds G Cello, BD Malamud) Vol. 261, pp. 155–167. (Geological Society: London)

Mollicone D, Eva HD , Achard F (2006) Human role in Russian wild fires. Nature  440, 436–437.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

Niklasson M , Granstrom A (2000) Numbers and sizes of fires: long-term spatially explicit fire history in a Swedish boreal landscape. Ecology  81, 1484–1499.


Oldford S, Leblon B, Maclean D , Flannigan MD (2006) Predicting slow-drying fire weather index fuel moisture codes with NOAA-AVHRR images in Canada’s northern boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing  27, 3881–3902.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Randerson JT, Liu H, Flanner MG, Chambers SD, Jin Y, Hess PG, Pfister G, Mack MC, Treseder KK, Welp LR, Chapin FS, Harden JW, Goulden ML, Lyons E, Neff JC, Schuur EAG , Zender CS (2006) The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming. Science  314, 1130–1132.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

Ricotta C, Avena G , Marchetti M (1999) The flaming sandpile: self-organized criticality and wildfires. Ecological Modelling  119, 73–77.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ricotta C, Arianoutsou M, Díaz-Delgado R, Duguy B, Lloret F, Maroudi E, Mazzoleni S, Moreno JM, Rambal S, Vallejo R , Vázquez A (2001) Self-organized criticality of wildfires ecologically revisited. Ecological Modelling  141, 307–311.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Song WG, Fan WC, Wang BH , Zhou JJ (2001) Self-organized criticality of forest fire in China. Ecological Modelling  145, 61–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stocks BJ, Lawson BD, Alexander ME, Van Wagner CE, McAlpine RS, Lynham TJ , Dube DE (1989) The Canadian forest fire danger rating system: an overview. Forestry Chronicle  65, 450–457.


Stocks BJ, Mason JA, Todd JB, Bosch EM, Wotton BM, Amiro BD, Flannigan MD, Hirsch KG, Logan KA, Martell DL , Skinner WR (2002) Large forest fires in Canada, 1959–1997. Journal of Geophysical Research  107, 8149.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turcotte DL , Malamud BD (2004) Landslides, forest fires, and earthquakes: examples of self-organized critical behavior. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications  340, 580–589.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wooster MJ, Zhukov B , Oertel D (2003) Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning: Derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products. Remote Sensing of Environment  86, 83–107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xiao J , Zhuang Q (2007) Drought effects on large fire activity in Canadian and Alaskan forests. Environmental Research Letters  2, 044003.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang JH, Wooster MJ, Tutubalina O , Perry GLW (2003) Monthly burned area and forest fire carbon emission estimates for the Russian Federation from SPOT VGT. Remote Sensing of Environment  87, 1–15.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhuang Q, McGuire AD, O’Neill KP, Harden JW, Romanovsky VE , Yarie J (2002) Modeling the soil thermal and carbon dynamics of a fire chronosequence in interior Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research  107, 8147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhuang Q, Melillo JM, Sarofim MC, Kicklighter DW, McGuire AD, Felzer BS, Sokolov A, Prinn RG, Steudler PA , Hu S (2006) CO2 and CH4 exchanges between land ecosystems and the atmosphere in northern high latitudes over the 21st century. Geophysical Research Letters  33, L17403.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |