Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A numerical study of slope and fuel structure effects on coupled wildfire behaviour

Rodman R. Linn A D , Judith L. Winterkamp A , David R. Weise B and Carleton Edminster C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 4955 Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: rrl@lanl.gov

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(2) 179-201 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07120
Submitted: 2 August 2007  Accepted: 3 November 2008   Published: 31 March 2010

Abstract

Slope and fuel structure are commonly accepted as major factors affecting the way wildfires behave. However, it is possible that slope affects fire differently depending on the fuel bed. Six FIRETEC simulations using three different fuel beds on flat and upslope topography were used to examine this possibility. Fuel beds resembling grass, chaparral, and ponderosa pine forests were created in such a way that there were two specific locations with identical local fuel beds located around them. These fuel beds were each used for a flat-terrain simulation and an idealised-hill simulation in order to isolate the impacts of the topography without the complications of having different local fuels. In these simulations, fuel bed characteristics have a significant effect on the spread rate and perimeter shape of the fires on both flat ground and on the idealised smooth hill topography. The analysis showed that these simulated fires evolved as they travelled between the locations even on flat ground, and the accelerations and decelerations that affect the fire occurred at different times and at different rates depending on the fuel bed. The results of these simulations and analyses indicate that though some general principles are true for all fuel beds, there are differences in the way that fires react to non-homogeneous topographies depending on the fuel bed.

Additional keywords: fire propagation, FIRETEC, non-local slope effects, vegetation structure effects.


Acknowledgements

The Los Alamos National Laboratory Institutional Computing Program provided critical computing resources for this work. Financial support for this work was provided by the USDA Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain and Pacific South-west Research Stations, the Joint Fire Science program, and the National Fire Plan.


References


Anderson HE (1983) Predicting wind-driven wildland fire size and shape. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-305. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: Fire Behavior Prediction and Burning Modeling System – BURN subsystem, Part 1. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report GTR-INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

Bossert JE, Linn RR, Reisner JM, Winterkamp JL, Dennison P, Roberts D (2000) Coupled atmosphere–fire behavior model sensitivity to spatial fuels characterization. In ‘Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, January 2000, Long Beach, CA. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Bradley M (2002) This model can take the heat. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Available at http://www.llnl.gov/str/November02/Bradley.html [Verified 24 March 2010]

Byram GM, Clements HB, Elliot ER, George PM (1964) An experimental study of model fires. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest and Range Experiment Station, Project Fire Model Technical Report 3. (Asheville, NC)

Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire  3, 31–44.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Coen JL (2000) Coupled atmosphere–fire model dynamics of a fireline crossing a hill. In ‘Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, January 2000, Long Beach, CA. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Cohen JD (1986) Estimating fire behavior with FIRECAST: user’s manual. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-90. (Berkeley, CA)

Colman JJ , Linn RR (2007) Separating combustion from pyrolysis in HIGRAD/FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire  16, 493–502.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cruz MG (2004) Ignition of crown fuels above a spreading surface fire. PhD thesis, University of Montana, Missoula.

Cunningham P , Linn RR (2007) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: dynamics of fire spread. Journal of Geophysical Research  112(D05), D05108.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Dupuy JL (1997) Mieux comprendre et prédire la propagation des feux de forêts: expérimentation, test et proposition de modéles. PhD thesis, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon.

Dupuy JL , Larini M (1999) Fire spread through a porous forest fuel bed: a radiative and convective model including fire-induced flow effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire  9, 155–172.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Fons WT (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. Journal of Agricultural Research  72, 93–121.
Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. Canadian Forest Service, Information Report ST-X-3. (Ottawa, ON)

Forthofer JM, Butler BW, Shannon KS, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS, Stratton R (2003) Predicting surface winds in complex terrain for use in fire spread models. In ‘Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, November 2003, Orlando, FL. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Grishin AM (2001a) Heat and mass transfer and modeling and prediction of environmental catastrophes. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics  74, 895–903.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Koo E, Pagni P, Woycheese J, Stephens S, Weise D, Huff J (2005) A simple physical model for forest fire spread. In ‘Fire Safety Science – Proceedings of Eighth International Symposium’, 18–23 September 2005, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. (Eds DT Gottuk, BY Lattimer) pp. 851–862. (International Association of Fire Safety Science)

Lindenmuth AWJr, Davis JR (1973) Predicting fire spread in Arizona’s oak chaparral. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-101. (Fort Collins, CO)

Linn R, Reisner J, Colman JJ , Winterkamp J (2002) Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 233–246.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Linn RR (1997) Transport model for prediction of wildfire behavior. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Scientific Report LA13334-T. (Los Alamos, NM)

Linn RR , Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research  110(D13), D13107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mahalingam S, Zhou X, Tachajapong W, Weise DR (2005) An examination of marginal burning and transition from ground-to-crown fires using laboratory and computational modeling. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th NRIFD Symposium’, November 2005, Mitaka, Japan. (National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster: Japan)

Margerit J , Séro-Guillaume O (2002) Modelling forest fires. Part II: reduction to two-dimensional models and simulation of propagation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer  45, 1723–1737.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Reisner JM, Bossert J, Winterkamp J (1998) Numerical simulation of two wildfire events using a combined modeling system (HIGRAD/BEHAVE). In ‘Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, January 1998, Phoenix, AZ. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Richards GD (1990) An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering  30, 1163–1179.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Séro-Guillaume O , Margerit J (2002) Modelling forest fires. Part I: a complete set of equations derived by extended irreversible thermodynamics. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer  45, 1705–1722.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tachajapong W, Zhou X, Mahalingam S, Weise DR (2006) Understanding crown fire initiation via experimental and computational modeling. In ‘Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Fire Research’, November 2006, Coimbra, Portugal. (Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Aerodinãmica Industrial: Coimbra, Portugal)

Viegas DX (2004a) Slope and wind effects on fire propagation. International Journal of Wildland Fire  13, 143–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Weise DR (1993) Modeling wind and slope-induced wildland fire behavior. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

Weise DR, Biging GS (1994) Effects of wind velocity and slope on fire behavior. In ‘Fire Safety Science – Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium’, July 1994, Ottawa, Canada. pp. 1041–1051. (International Association for Fire Safety Science)

Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L , Mahalingam S (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – ‘go or no-go?’ International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 99–106.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou X, Weise DR , Mahalingam S (2005) Experimental measurements and numerical modeling of marginal burning in live chaparral fuel beds. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute  30, 2287–2294.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise DR (2007) Experimental study and large eddy simulation of effect of terrain slope on marginal burning in shrub fuel beds. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute  31, 2547–2555.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |