A numerical study of slope and fuel structure effects on coupled wildfire behaviour
Rodman R. Linn A D , Judith L. Winterkamp A , David R. Weise B and Carleton Edminster CA Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
B USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 4955 Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.
C USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: rrl@lanl.gov
International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(2) 179-201 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07120
Submitted: 2 August 2007 Accepted: 3 November 2008 Published: 31 March 2010
Abstract
Slope and fuel structure are commonly accepted as major factors affecting the way wildfires behave. However, it is possible that slope affects fire differently depending on the fuel bed. Six FIRETEC simulations using three different fuel beds on flat and upslope topography were used to examine this possibility. Fuel beds resembling grass, chaparral, and ponderosa pine forests were created in such a way that there were two specific locations with identical local fuel beds located around them. These fuel beds were each used for a flat-terrain simulation and an idealised-hill simulation in order to isolate the impacts of the topography without the complications of having different local fuels. In these simulations, fuel bed characteristics have a significant effect on the spread rate and perimeter shape of the fires on both flat ground and on the idealised smooth hill topography. The analysis showed that these simulated fires evolved as they travelled between the locations even on flat ground, and the accelerations and decelerations that affect the fire occurred at different times and at different rates depending on the fuel bed. The results of these simulations and analyses indicate that though some general principles are true for all fuel beds, there are differences in the way that fires react to non-homogeneous topographies depending on the fuel bed.
Additional keywords: fire propagation, FIRETEC, non-local slope effects, vegetation structure effects.
Acknowledgements
The Los Alamos National Laboratory Institutional Computing Program provided critical computing resources for this work. Financial support for this work was provided by the USDA Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain and Pacific South-west Research Stations, the Joint Fire Science program, and the National Fire Plan.
Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 3, 31–44.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Colman JJ , Linn RR (2007) Separating combustion from pyrolysis in HIGRAD/FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 493–502.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cunningham P , Linn RR (2007) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: dynamics of fire spread. Journal of Geophysical Research 112(D05), D05108.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dupuy JL , Larini M (1999) Fire spread through a porous forest fuel bed: a radiative and convective model including fire-induced flow effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire 9, 155–172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fons WT (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. Journal of Agricultural Research 72, 93–121.
Grishin AM (2001a) Heat and mass transfer and modeling and prediction of environmental catastrophes. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics 74, 895–903.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Linn R, Reisner J, Colman JJ , Winterkamp J (2002) Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire 11, 233–246.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Linn RR , Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research 110(D13), D13107.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Margerit J , Séro-Guillaume O (2002) Modelling forest fires. Part II: reduction to two-dimensional models and simulation of propagation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45, 1723–1737.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Richards GD (1990) An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 30, 1163–1179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Séro-Guillaume O , Margerit J (2002) Modelling forest fires. Part I: a complete set of equations derived by extended irreversible thermodynamics. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45, 1705–1722.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Viegas DX (2004a) Slope and wind effects on fire propagation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 13, 143–156.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L , Mahalingam S (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – ‘go or no-go?’ International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 99–106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou X, Weise DR , Mahalingam S (2005) Experimental measurements and numerical modeling of marginal burning in live chaparral fuel beds. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 30, 2287–2294.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise DR (2007) Experimental study and large eddy simulation of effect of terrain slope on marginal burning in shrub fuel beds. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 31, 2547–2555.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |