Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An examination of flame shape related to convection heat transfer in deep-fuel beds

Kara M. Yedinak A B D , Jack D. Cohen A C D , Jason M. Forthofer A and Mark A. Finney A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

B Laboratory of Atmospheric Research, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: jcohen@fs.fed.us

D Authors have contributed equally to this paper.

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(2) 171-178 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07143
Submitted: 29 September 2007  Accepted: 15 August 2008   Published: 31 March 2010

Abstract

Fire spread through a fuel bed produces an observable curved combustion interface. This shape has been schematically represented largely without consideration for fire spread processes. The shape and dynamics of the flame profile within the fuel bed likely reflect the mechanisms of heat transfer necessary for the pre-heating and ignition of the fuel during fire spread. We developed a simple laminar flame model for examining convection heat transfer as a potentially significant fire spread process. The flame model produced a flame profile qualitatively comparable to experimental flames and similar to the combustion interface of spreading fires. The model comparison to flame experiments revealed that at increasing fuel depths (>0.7 m), lateral flame extension was increased through transition and turbulent flame behaviour. Given previous research indicating that radiation is not sufficient for fire spread, this research suggests that flame turbulence can produce the convection heat transfer (i.e. flame contact) necessary for fire spread particularly in vertically arranged, discontinuous fuels such as shrub and tree canopies.

Additional keywords: crown fires, discontinuous fuels, laminar flame model, wildfire convection heat transfer.


Acknowledgements

We thank Ian Grob, Anita Hershman, Danielle Paige, Isaac Grenfell, Kyle Shannon and James Riser for their technical support in the development of this research.


References


Albini FA (1967) A physical model for firespread in brush. In ‘11th Symposium on Combustion’, 14–20 August 1966, Berkeley, CA. pp. 553–560. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Albini FA (1982) Response of free-burning fires to non-steady wind. Combustion Science and Technology  29, 225–241.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Anderson HE (1969) Heat transfer and fire spread. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-RP-69. (Ogden, UT)

Beer T (1995) Fire propagation in vertical stick arrays: the effects of wind. International Journal of Wildland Fire  5, 43–49.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Black WZ, Hartley JG (1985) ‘Thermodynamics.’ (Harper and Row: New York)

Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Tate AG, Butler B, Rothermel RC (2002) A model for the steady spread of fire through a homogeneous fuel bed. In ‘Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety: Proceedings of IV International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, 18–23 November 2002, Luso, Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (Millpress: Rotterdam, the Netherlands)

de Mestre N, Rothermel RC, Wilson R, Albini F (1985) Radiation screened fire propagation. University of New South Wales, University College ADFA, Report No. 2/85. (Canberra)

Emmons HW (1965) Fundamental problems of the free burning fire. In ‘10th Symposium (International) on Combustion’, 17–21 August 1964, Cambridge, UK. pp. 951–964. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Finney MA, Cohen JD, Grenfell IC, Yedinak KM (2006) Experiments on fire spread in discontinuous fuelbeds. In ‘V International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, 27–30 November 2006, Figuiera de Foz, Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (CD-ROM) (Elsevier)

Fons WL (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. Journal of Agricultural Research  72, 93–120.
Hottel HC, Williams GC, Steward FR (1965) The modelling of firespread through a fuel bed. In ‘10th Symposium (International) on Combustion’, 17–21 August 1964, Cambridge, UK. pp. 997–1007. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Incopera FP, DeWitt DP (2002) ‘Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer.’ 5th edn. (Wiley: New York)

McCarter RJ , Broido A (1965) Radiative and convective energy from wood crib fires. Pyrodynamics  2, 65–85.
Quintiere JG (2006) ‘Fundamentals of fire phenomena.’ (Wiley: New York)

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Tillman DA, Rossi AJ, Kitto WD (1981) ‘Wood combustion: principles, processes, and economics.’ (Academic Press: New York)

Van Wagner CE (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  7, 23–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vogel M , Williams FA (1970) Flame propagation along matchstick arrays. Combustion Science and Technology  1, 429–436.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weber RO (1990) A model for fire propagation in arrays. Mathematical and Computer Modelling  13, 95–102.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weber RO (1991) Modelling fire spread through fuel beds. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science  17, 67–82.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |




Appendix

Eqn A1 represents the Grashof number.

E10

A Grashof number value of Gr ≥ 109 indicates turbulent natural convection (Quintiere 2006). By setting Gr = 109 and solving for the flow length, l we can estimate the flame height at which turbulent flow is expected:

E11

where Tflame = 1000 K; T = 294 K; Tfilm = (Tflame + T)/2 = 647 K; g = 9.81 m s–2; β, fluid expansion coefficient; for an ideal gas, β ≈ 1/Tfilm = 1.48 × 10–3 K–1; νfilm, kinematic viscosity; νfilm(Tfilm) = 59.76 × 10–6 m2 s–1 (A4; Incopera and DeWitt 2002); l = 0.694 m (flow length).

The Grashof number analysis indicates that we should expect turbulent flame convection at lengths of 0.7 m and greater.