Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF07046
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 17(5)

Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation

Matt P. Plucinski A B C and Wendy R. Anderson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, UNSW@ADFA, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

B Present address: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box E4008, Kingston, ACT 2604, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: matt.plucinski@csiro.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(5) 628-637 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07046
Submitted: 26 February 2007  Accepted: 9 April 2008   Published: 3 October 2008

Abstract

Factors affecting ignition thresholds of the litter layer of shrubland vegetation were investigated using reconstructed litter beds in a laboratory. The factors investigated were fuel moisture content (FMC), litter type (primarily species), pilot ignition source, and wind. Litter beds made from 11 different litter types were ignited with point ignition sources. Litter from Allocasuarina nana (Sieber ex Spreng.) L.A.S. Johnson was used as the standard type across all experiments. Successful ignition was defined as fire spreading a fixed distance from the ignition point. Ignition success was modelled as a logistic function of FMC. Litter type had a major effect on ignitibility. The bulk density of the litter bed and the surface area of litter per volume of litter bed provided reasonably good predictors of the effect of litter type on ignition success. Low-density litter beds ignited at higher FMCs than dense litter beds. The two densest litter beds failed to ignite with the procedures used here. The ignition sources tested had significantly different effects on ignition success. Larger ignition sources were able to ignite wetter fuels than smaller sources. The presence of wind was found to have a different effect on ignition success depending on the location of the ignition source with respect to the litter bed. Wind decreased ignition success when the ignition source was located on top of the litter bed, but aided ignition when the ignition source was located within the litter bed.

Additional keywords: ignition thresholds, laboratory experiments, shrubland litter.




1 The order of magnitude and units are incorrect in Scarff and Westoby (2006) (see Scarff and Westoby 2007).

2 There is a typographical error in the label of the x-axis in fig. 2a in Scarff and Westoby (2006), the label should read ‘Conductivity (m2 Pa–1 s–1 10–3)’ (see Scarff and Westoby 2007).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ross Bradstock, Malcolm Gill and Peter Moore for their valuable assistance. CSIRO Plant Industry generously provided the use of facilities at the Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra. The present project was part of an Australian Research Council and New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service-funded strategic partnerships with industry-research and training (SPIRT) scholarship investigating ignition and development of fire in shrublands.


References


Blackmarr WH (1972) Moisture content influences on ignitability of slash pine litter. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Research Note SE-173. (Asheville, NC)

Bradstock RA, Tozer MG , Keith DA (1997) Effects of high-frequency fire on floristic composition and abundance in a fire-prone heathland near Sydney. Australian Journal of Botany  45, 641–655.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brown JK (1970) Physical fuel properties of ponderosa pine forest floors and cheatgrass. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Research Paper INT-74. (Ogden, UT)

Bunting SC , Wright HA (1974) Ignition capabilities of non-flaming firebrands. Journal of Forestry  72, 646–649.
Clarke I , Lee H (1987) ‘Name that Flower: the Identification of Flowering Plants.’ (Melbourne University Press: Melbourne)

Cox DR , Snell EJ (1989) ‘The Analysis of Binary Data.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall: London)

Cragg JG , Uhler RS (1970) The demand for automobiles. The Canadian Journal of Economics. Revue Canadienne d’Economique  3, 386–406.
Ellis PF (2000) The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark: a firebrand study. PhD Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

Fernandes PM , Botelho HS , Loureiro C (2002) Models for the sustained ignition and behaviour of low-to-moderately intense fires in maritime pine stands. In ‘Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety’, Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Forest Fire Research/2002 Wildland Fire Safety Summit, 18–23 November 2002, Luso–Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) On CD-ROM. (Millpress Scientific Publications: Rotterdam, the Netherlands)

Fernandes PM, Botelho H, Rego F , Loureiro C (2008) Using fuel and weather variables to predict the sustainability of surface fire spread in maritime pine stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  38, 190–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gill AM , Moore PHR (1996) Ignitability of leaves of Australian plants. Contract report to the Australia Flora Foundation. Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry. (Canberra)

Green LR (1981) Burning by prescription in chaparral. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimental Station, General Technical Report PSW-51. (Berkley, CA)

Hosmer DW , Lemeshow S (2000) ‘Applied Logistic Regression.’ 2nd edn. (Wiley Interscience: New York)

Keith DA , McCaw WL , Whelan RJ (2002) Fire regimes in Australian heathlands and their effects on plants and animals. In ‘Flammable Australia: the Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent’. (Eds RA Bradstock, JE Williams, AM Gill) pp. 199–237. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Latham DJ , Schlieter JA (1989) Ignition probabilities of wildland fuels based on simulated lightning discharges. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Research Paper INT-411. (Ogden, UT)

Lawson BD , Armitage OB , Dalrymple GN (1994) Ignition probabilities for simulated people-caused fires in British Columbia’s lodgepole pine and white spruce–subalpine fir forests. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 26–29 October 1993, Jekyll Island, GA. SAF Publication 94-02. pp. 493–505. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)

Lawson BD , Dalrymple GN (1996) Probabilities of sustained ignition in lodgepole pine, interior Douglas-fir, and white spruce subalpine fir forest types. Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, and British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Research Branch. FRDA Supplement 1 to FRDA Handbook 12. (Victoria, BC)

Lehmann EL (1986) ‘Testing Statistical Hypotheses.’ 2nd edn. (Wiley: New York)

Lin CC (1999) Modelling probability of ignition in Taiwan red pine forests. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science  14, 339–344.
Luke RH , McArthur AG (1978) ‘Bushfires in Australia.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR , Yang JC (2006) Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland–urban interface fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire  15, 427–431.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McCaw WL (1986) Behaviour and short-term effects of two fires in regenerated karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) forest. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Technical Report No. 9. (Perth, WA)

McCaw WL (1991) Fire spread prediction in mallee-heath shrublands in south-western Australia. In ‘11th International Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 16–19 April 1991, Missoula, MT. (Eds PL Andrews, DF Potts) pp. 226–233. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)

McCaw WL (1995) Predicting fire spread in Western Australian mallee-heath. CALMScience (Suppl. 4), 35–42.

Muraszew A , Fedele JB (1976) Statistical model for spot fire hazard. The Aerospace Corporation, ATR-77(7588)-1. (El Segundo, CA)

Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika  78, 691–692.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pérez-Gorostiaga P , Vega JA , Fonturbel MT , Guijarro M , Hernando C , Diez C , Martinez E , Lampin-Cabaret C , Blanc L , Colin PY (2002) Capability of ignition of some forest firebrands. In ‘Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety’, Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Forest Fire Research/2002 Wildland Fire Safety Summit, 18–23 November 2002, Luso–Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) On CD-ROM. (Millpress Scientific Publications: Rotterdam, the Netherlands)

Plucinski MP (2003) The investigation of factors governing ignition and development of fires in heathland vegetation. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, ADFA, Canberra. Available at http://www.library.unsw.edu.au/%7Ethesis/adt-ADFA/public/adt-ADFA20031209.131025/index.html [Verified 8 August 2008]

Scarff FR , Westoby M (2006) Leaf litter flammability in some semi-arid Australian woodlands. Functional Ecology  20, 745–752.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Schroeder MJ (1969) Ignition probability. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountains Research Station, Office Report 2106–1. (Fort Collins, CO)

Weise DR, Xiangyang Z, Lulu S , Shankar M (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – ‘go or no-go?’. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 99–106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson RA (1985) Observations of extinction and marginal burning in free burning porous fuel beds. Combustion Science and Technology  44, 179–194.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |