Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantifying parametric uncertainty in the Rothermel model

Edwin Jimenez A , M. Yousuff Hussaini A C and Scott Goodrick B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Computational Science, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.

B USDA Forest Service Center for Forest Disturbance Science, 320 Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: myh@scs.fsu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(5) 638-649 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07070
Submitted: 16 May 2007  Accepted: 6 February 2008   Published: 3 October 2008

Abstract

The purpose of the present work is to quantify parametric uncertainty in the Rothermel wildland fire spread model (implemented in software such as BehavePlus3 and FARSITE), which is undoubtedly among the most widely used fire spread models in the United States. This model consists of a non-linear system of equations that relates environmental variables (input parameter groups) such as fuel type, fuel moisture, terrain, and wind to describe the fire environment. This model predicts important fire quantities (output parameters) such as the head rate of spread, spread direction, effective wind speed, and fireline intensity. The proposed method, which we call sensitivity derivative enhanced sampling, exploits sensitivity derivative information to accelerate the convergence of the classical Monte Carlo method. Coupled with traditional variance reduction procedures, it offers up to two orders of magnitude acceleration in convergence, which implies that two orders of magnitude fewer samples are required for a given level of accuracy. Thus, it provides an efficient method to quantify the impact of input uncertainties on the output parameters.


References


Bachmann A (2001) GIS-based wildland fire risk analysis. PhD thesis, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.

Bachmann A , Allgower B (2002) Uncertainty propagation in wildland fire behaviour modeling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science  16, 115–127.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohn JD (1978) The National Fire Danger Rating System. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-39. (Ogden, UT)

Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Fort Collins, CO)

Fujioka FM (2002) A new method for the analysis of fire spread modeling errors. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 193–203.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau, Forestry Research Institute, Leaflet No. 100. (Canberra, ACT)

Ross S (1997) ‘A First Course in Probability.’ (Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ)

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F, Ratto M (2004) ‘Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: a Guide to Assessing Scientific Models.’ (Halsted Press: New York)

Shiryayev AN (1984) ‘Probability.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Stamatiadis S, Prosmiti R , Farantos SC (2000) Auto_deriv: tool for automatic differentiation of a FORTRAN code. Computer Physics Communications  127, 343–355.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Walters RW, Huyse L (2002) Uncertainty analysis for fluid mechanics with applications. ICASE Report No. 2002–1. (Hampton, VA)

Weber RO (2001) ‘Wildland Fire Spread Models in Forest Fires: Behavior and Ecological Effects.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)