Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF07021
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 17(3)

Using visual obstruction to estimate heathland fuel load and structure

G. M. Davies A B , A. Hamilton C , A. Smith B and C. J. Legg A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for the Study of Environmental Change and Sustainability, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JN, United Kingdom.

B The Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Drumochter Lodge, Dalwhinnie, Inverness-shire, PH19 1AF, United Kingdom.

C Centre for Environmental History, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom.

D Corresponding author. Email: colin.legg@ed.ac.uk

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(3) 380-389 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07021
Submitted: 6 February 2007  Accepted: 10 December 2007   Published: 23 June 2008

Abstract

We present a simple non-destructive technique for assessing fuel load and critical aspects of vegetation structure that play important roles in determining fire behaviour. The method is tested in a Scottish Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull heathland but could be applied to any vegetation up to ~1 m high. Visual obstruction of a banded measurement stick (the FuelRule) placed vertically through a stand of vegetation is governed by a combination of the height of the vegetation and its density. The vertical distribution of visual obstruction is calibrated to give estimates of total fuel loading, the loading of separate size categories and the vertical distribution and horizontal heterogeneity of fuels. The present paper provides a quick and simple method for estimating total aboveground biomass and structure that may be useful not just in studies of fire behaviour but where non-destructive assessment of biomass, vegetation density or canopy structure is needed. Calibration equations can be rapidly created for use in other vegetation or fuel types.

Additional keywords: biomass estimation, bulk density, Calluna vulgaris, canopy density, fine fuels, moorland, observer error, Scotland, shrub.


Acknowledgements

We thank the owners and gamekeepers of Ralia Enterprises for fieldwork access to Crubenmore, Ralia and South Drumochter Estates: Alistair and Michael Findlay, John and Ira Drysdale, Alistair Lyon and Ken Dakers, and the RSPB for access to the Abernethy Forest Reserve. Mark Hancock (RSPB), Michael Bruce and Gary Servant (Glen Tanar Estate) made helpful comments on the design of the FuelRule. Angus MacDonald of SNH gave extremely helpful comments on the manuscript. Three anonymous reviewers provided useful advice for which we are grateful. The present work was funded by NERC, The Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust and Scottish Natural Heritage.


References


Anderson HE (1970) Forest fuel ignitability. Fire Technology  6, 312–319.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behaviour. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-122. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL, Bevins CD, Seli RC (2005) BehavePlus Fire Modelling System Version 3.0: User’s Guide. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-106WWW Revised. (Ogden, UT)

Bardgett RD, Marsden JH , Howard DC (1995) The extent and condition of heather on moorland in the uplands of England and Wales. Biological Conservation  71, 155–161.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brown JK, Oberhau RD, Johnston CM (1982) Handbook for inventorying surface fuels and biomass in the Interior West. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-129. (Ogden, UT)

Cannell MGR, Fowler D , Pitcairn CER (1997) Climate change and pollutant impacts on Scottish vegetation. Botanical Journal of Scotland  49, 301–313.
Cohen M, Rigolot E, Valette JC (2003) From the vegetation to the inputs of a fire model: fuel modelling for WUI management. In ‘Proceedings of the International Workshop Forest Fires in the Wildland–Urban Interface and Rural Areas in Europe: an Integral Planning and Management Challenge’, 15–16 May 2003, Athens, Greece. (Ed. G Xanthopoulos) Available at http://www.fria.gr/warmProceedings.htm [Verified 22 May 2008]

Davies GM (2005) Fire behaviour and impact on heather moorland. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Davies GM, Legg CJ, Smith A , MacDonald A (2006) Developing shrub fire behaviour models in an oceanic climate: burning in the British uplands. Forest Ecology and Management  234(Suppl. 1), S107.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Drysdale D (1998) ‘An Introduction to Fire Dynamics.’ (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

Egan S, Smith A, Robertson D , Waterhouse A (2000) Estimation of heather biomass using ground-based methods for the calibration of remotely sensed data. Aspects of Applied Biology  58, 1–9.
Forestry Canada (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behaviour Prediction System. Forestry Canada, Fire Danger Group, Science and Sustainable Development Directorate, Information Report ST-X-3. (Ottawa, ON)

Gimeno-García E, Andreu V , Rubio JL (2004) Spatial patterns of soil temperatures during experimental fires. Geoderma  118, 17–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hamilton A (2000) The characteristics and effects of management fire on blanket bog in north-west Scotland. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Hartley SE (1997) The effects of grazing and nutrient inputs on grass–heather competition. Botanical Journal of Scotland  49, 315–324.
Minitab Inc (2003) ‘MINITAB, release 14 for Windows.’ (Minitab Inc.: State College, PA)

Molina MJ , Llinares JV (2001) Temperature–time curves at the soil surface in maquis summer fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire  10, 45–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ontario Institute of Pedology (1985) ‘Field Manual for Describing Soils.’ 3rd edn. Ontario Institute of Pedology. OIP Publication No. 85–3. (University of Guelph: Ontario, ON)

Ottmar RD, Vihnanek RE, Miranda HS, Sato MN, Andrade SMA (2001) Stereo photo series for quantifying cerrado fuels in central Brazil: Volume 1. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-519. (Portland, OR)

Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD (1996) ‘Introduction to Wildland Fire.’ (Wiley: New York)

Robel RJ, Briggs JN, Dayton AD , Hulbert LC (1970) Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. Journal of Range Management  23, 295–297.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rodwell JS (1991a) ‘British Plant Communities. Volume 1: Woodlands and Scrub.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Rodwell JS (1991b) ‘British Plant Communities. Volume 2: Mires and Heaths.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Russell W, Tompkins R (2005) Estimating biomass in coastal Baccharis pilularis dominated plant communities. Fire Ecology 1, 20–27. Available at http://www.fireecology.net/pdfs/3_russell.pdf [Verified 22 May 2008]

Schwilk DW (2003) Flammability is a niche construction trait: canopy architecture affects fire intensity. American Naturalist  162, 725–733.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-153. (Fort Collins, CO)

Shropshire C, Wagner RG, Bell WF , Swanton CJ (2001) Light attenuation by early successional plants of the boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  31, 812–823.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stewart KEJ, Bourn NAD , Thomas JA (2001) An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology  38, 1148–1154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomas PH (1971) Rates of spread of some wind-driven fires. Forestry  44, 155–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Wagner CE (1968) The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Science  14, 20–26.


Van Wilgen BW, Le Maitre DC , Kruger FJ (1985) Fire behaviour in South African fynbos (macchia) vegetation and predictions from Rothermel’s fire model. Journal of Applied Ecology  22, 207–216.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watt AS (1955) Bracken versus heather, a study in plant sociology. Journal of Ecology  43, 490–506.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wessel WW, Tietema A, Beier C, Emmet BA, Penuelas J , Riis-Nielsen T (2004) A qualitative ecosystem assessment for different shrublands in Western Europe under impact of climate change. Ecosystems  7, 662–671.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wright GG, Sibbald AR , Allison JS (1997) The integration of a satellite spectral analysis into a heather moorland management model (HMMM): the case of Moidach More, northeast Scotland, U.K. International Journal of Remote Sensing  18, 2319–2336.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |