Probability based models for estimation of wildfire risk*
Haiganoush K. Preisler A , David R. Brillinger B , Robert E. Burgan C and J. W. Benoit DA USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 800 Buchanan St., West Annex, Albany, CA 94710, USA. Telephone: +1 510 559 6484; fax: +1 510 559 6440; email: hpreisler@fs.fed.us
B Department of Statistics, 367 Evans Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3860, USA. Telephone: +1 510 642 0611; fax: +1 510 642 7892; email: brill@stat.berkeley.edu
C Retired, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory.
D USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside Fire Laboratory.
International Journal of Wildland Fire 13(2) 133-142 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF02061
Submitted: 16 November 2002 Accepted: 7 November 2003 Published: 29 June 2004
Abstract
We present a probability-based model for estimating fire risk. Risk is defined using three probabilities: the probability of fire occurrence; the conditional probability of a large fire given ignition; and the unconditional probability of a large fire. The model is based on grouped data at the 1 km2-day cell level. We fit a spatially and temporally explicit non-parametric logistic regression to the grouped data. The probability framework is particularly useful for assessing the utility of explanatory variables, such as fire weather and danger indices for predicting fire risk. The model may also be used to produce maps of predicted probabilities and to estimate the total number of expected fires, or large fires, in a given region and time period. As an example we use historic data from the State of Oregon to study the significance and the forms of relationships between some of the commonly used weather and danger variables on the probabilities of fire. We also produce maps of predicted probabilities for the State of Oregon. Graphs of monthly total numbers of fires are also produced for a small region in Oregon, as an example, and expected numbers are compared to actual numbers of fires for the period 1989–1996. The fits appear to be reasonable; however, the standard errors are large indicating the need for additional weather or topographic variables.
Additional keywords: : fire danger indices; fire occurrence probabilities; fire weather; forest fires; non-parametric regression; Oregon; spatial–temporal model.
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the help of Carolyn Chase, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, in transferring historical weather, fire danger index and fire history data to the Riverside Fire Laboratory.
Anderson K, Martell DL, Flannigan MD , Wang D (2000) Modeling of fire occurrence in the boreal forest region of Canada. In (Eds E Kasischke , BJ Stocks ) pp. 357–367. (Springer-Verlag: New York)
Andrews PL , Bradshaw LS (1997) ‘Fires: Fire information retrieval and evaluation system—a program for fire danger rating analysis.’ Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-367. (USDA Forest Service: Ogden, UT)
Brillinger DR, Preisler HK , Benoit JW (2003) Risk assessment: a forest fire example. In (Ed. DR Goldstein ) pp. 177–196. (Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Beachwood, OH)
Burgan RE (1988) ‘1988 Revisions to the 1978 National Fire-Danger Rating system.’ Southeastern Forest Experiment Station Research paper SE-273. (USDA Forest Service: Asheville, NC)
Burgan RE, Klaver RW , Klaver JM (1998) Fuel models and fire potential from satellite and surface observations. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 159–170.
Chou YH, Minnich RA, Salazar LA, Power JD , Dezzani RJ (1990) Spatial autocorrelation of wildfire distribution in the Idyllwild Quadrangle, San Jacinto mountains, California, USA. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 56(11), 1507–1513.
Chou YH, Minnich RA , Chase RA (1993) Mapping probability of fire occurrence in San Jacinto mountains, California, USA. Environmental Management 17(1), 129–140.
Chuvieco E , Salas J (1996) Mapping the spatial distribution of forest fire danger using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10(3), 333–345.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cleveland WS, Grosse E , Shyu WM (1992) Local regression models. In (Eds JM Chambers , TJ Hastie ) pp. 309–376. (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA)
Cunningham AA , Martell DL (1972) A stochastic model for the occurrence of man-caused forest fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 3, 282–287.
Dayananda PWA (1977) Stochastic models for forest fires. Ecological Modelling 3, 309–313.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Deeming JE, Lancaster JW, Fosberg MA, Furman RW , Schroeder MJ (1972) ‘The National Fire-Danger Rating System.’ Research Paper RM-84.
Grissino-Mayer HD (1999) Modeling fire interval data from the American Southwest with the Weibull distribution. International Journal of Wildland Fire 9((1)), 37–50.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hastie TJ (1992) Generalized additive models. In (Eds JM Chambers , TJ Hastie ) pp. 249–307. (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA)
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R (1991) ‘Generalized additive models.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York)
Hodges JL , Le Cam LM (1960) The Poisson approximation to the Poisson Binomial distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37, 737–740.
Johnson EA , Gutsell SL (1994) Fire frequency models, methods and interpretations. Advances in Ecological Research 25, 239–287.
Keetch JJ , Byram GM (1968) ‘A drought index for forest fire control.’ Research Paper SE-38.
Mandallaz D , Ye R (1997) Prediction of forest fires with Poisson models. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27, 1685–1694.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martell DL, Bevilacqua E , Stocks BJ (1989) Modelling seasonal variation in daily people-caused forest fire occurrence. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19, 1555–1563.
Martell DL, Otukol S , Stocks BJ (1987) A logistic model for predicting daily people-caused forest fire occurrence. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17, 394–401.
Mosteller F, Tukey JW (1977) ‘Data analysis and regression.’ (Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA)
Peng R , Schoenberg F (2001) ‘Estimation of wildfire hazard using spatial-temporal fire history data.’ Technical report. (Statistics Department, University of California: Los Angeles)
Reed WJ (1998) Determining changes in historical forest fire frequency from a time-since-fire map. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statisctics 3, 430–450.
Reed WJ, Larsen CPS, Johnson EA , MacDonald GM (1998) Estimation of temporal variations in fire frequency from time-since-fire map data. Forest Science 44, 465–475.
Roads JO, Chen SC , Fujioka F (2001) ECPC's weekly to seasonal global forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 82, 639–658.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
S-PLUS (2000) ‘User’s guide.’ (Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft: Seattle)
Van Wagner CE (1987) ‘Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System.’ Ontario Forestry Technical Report No. 35. (Canadian Forest Service: Ottawa)
* This paper was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and therefore is in the public domain and not subject to copyright.