A brief history of economic evaluation for human papillomavirus vaccination policy
Philippe Beutels A B D and Mark Jit CA Present address: Centre for Health Economics Research and Modeling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp 2610, Belgium.
B School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
C Modelling and Economics Unit, Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
D Corresponding author. Email: philippe.beutels@ua.ac.be
Sexual Health 7(3) 352-358 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10018
Submitted: 16 February 2010 Accepted: 28 May 2010 Published: 19 August 2010
Abstract
Background: This commentary discusses key issues for health economic evaluation and modelling, applied to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine programs. Methods: We outline some of the specific features of HPV disease and vaccination, and associated policy questions in light of a literature search for economic evaluations on HPV vaccination. Results: We observe that some policy questions could not be reliably addressed by many of the 43 published economic evaluations we found. Despite this, policy making on universal HPV vaccination followed shortly after vaccine licensure in many developed countries, so the role economic evaluation played in informing these decisions (pre-dating 2008) seems to have been fairly limited. For more recent decisions, however, economic evaluation is likely to have been used more widely and more intensively. Conclusions: We expect future cost-effectiveness analyses to be more instrumental in policy making regarding vaccines covering more HPV types, therapeutic HPV vaccines, and novel diagnostic tests for biomarkers of HPV infection and disease integrated with cervical screening programs.
Additional keywords: HPV, modelling, vaccine programs.
[1] zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers – a brief historical account. Virology 2009; 384 260–5.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified May 2010].
[75] Levy-Bruhl D, Bousquet V, King LA, O’Flanagan D, Bacci S, Lopalco PL, et al. The current state of introduction of HPV vaccination into national immunisation schedules in Europe: results of the VENICE 2008 survey. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45 2709–13.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified May 2010].
[80] Clement FM, Harris A, Li JJ, Yong K, Lee KM, Manns BJ. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada. JAMA 2009; 302 1437–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[81] Roughead EE, Gilbert AL, Vitry AI. The Australian funding debate on quadrivalent HPV vaccine: a case study for the national pharmaceutical policy. Health Policy 2008; 88 250–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[82] Haas M, Ashton T, Blum K, Christiansen T, Conis E, Crivelli L, et al. Drugs, sex, money and power: an HPV vaccine case study. Health Policy 2009; 92 288–95.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[83] Brinsmead R, Hill S, Walker D. Are economic evaluations of vaccines useful to decision-makers? Case study of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23 32–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[84] Welte R, Trotter CL, Edmunds WJ, Postma MJ, Beutels P. The role of economic evaluation in vaccine decision making: focus on meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23 855–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[85] Zanetti AR, Van Damme P, Shouval D. The global impact of vaccination against hepatitis B: a historical overview. Vaccine 2008; 26 6266–73.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |