Role of the general practitioner in testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: an analysis of enhanced surveillance data
Kelly Shaw A B C , Nicola Stephens A , David Coleman A and Maree O’Sullivan AA Department of Health and Human Services, GPO Box 125, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.
B Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: kelly.shaw@dhhs.tas.gov.au
Sexual Health 6(3) 208-212 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09010
Submitted: 30 January 2009 Accepted: 21 April 2009 Published: 3 August 2009
Abstract
Background: To examine the relationship between genital chlamydia testing by healthcare providers and patient demographic characteristics in Tasmania, Australia, from 2001 to 2007. Methods: Analysis of enhanced surveillance data for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections notified to the Tasmanian Communicable Diseases Prevention Unit between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2007. Results: General practitioners identify most cases of genital chlamydia infection, irrespective of patient age, gender, indigenous status or urban status. Tests that are performed for screening purposes identify the largest number of cases in females, particularly in very young females. In males, tests performed due to the presence of clinical symptoms identify the majority of cases. However, tests performed for the purposes of contact tracing also identify a substantial burden of genital chlamydia infection, particularly in males. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the critical role the general practitioner has in the identification of genital chlamydia infection. Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydia, including in the context of contact tracing, is an essential clinical activity that results in the identification of substantial numbers of cases of infection. Policy makers and public health practitioners should support general practice screening initiatives and remove the barriers to genital chlamydia screening in general practice.
Additional keywords: genital infection, public health.
[1] Chen M, Donovan B. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia: epidemiology and clinical implications. Sex Health 2004; 1 189–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [accessed December 2008].
[7]
[8] Bowden F, Currie MJ, Toyne H, McGuiness C, Lim LL, Butler JR, et al. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis at the time of routine Pap smear in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2006; 188 76–80.
[9] Workowski KA, Berman SM. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55 1–94.
| PubMed |
[10] Chen M, Donovan B. Screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: are men the forgotten reservoir? Med J Aust 2003; 179 124–5.
| PubMed |
[11] Hocking J, Parker RM, Pavlin N, Fairley CK, Gunn JM. What needs to change to increase chlamydia screening in general practice in Australia? The views of general practitioners. BMC Public Health 2008; 8 425–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[12] McNamee K, Fairley C, Hocking J. Chlamydia testing and notification in Australia: more money, more tests. BMJ 2008; 84 565–9.
| CAS |