General Practice funding to improve provision of adolescent primary sexual health care in New Zealand: results from an observational intervention
Jane Morgan A C and Jarrod Haar BA Waikato Hospital, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton, New Zealand.
B Department of Strategy and Human Resource Management, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: morganj@waikatodhb.govt.nz
Sexual Health 6(3) 203-207 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09012
Submitted: 3 February 2009 Accepted: 24 April 2009 Published: 3 August 2009
Abstract
Background: Free general practice (GP) sexual health visits for registered adolescents have been introduced in parts of New Zealand with the aim of improving provision of primary sexual health care. Published evidence of the effectiveness of such health care interventions, particularly around any impact on uptake of testing and detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, is limited. Methods: In 2003–2004, additional funding enabled 20 practices in Waikato, New Zealand to offer free sexual health consultations for registered under-25 year olds. Practice selection was non-random and biased towards lower socioeconomic, Māori and rural populations. Registered population data were linked to laboratory testing for C. trachomatis from January 2003 to December 2005. Twenty-nine practices without additional funding served as controls. Results: Chlamydia testing among under-25 year olds at the 20 intervention practices increased over time, in contrast to non-intervention practices, with coverage of females aged 18–24 years within the intervention increasing from 13.9% in 2003, to 15.5% during the roll-out phase and to 16.8% in 2005. Intervention practices had higher test positivity rates than non-intervention practices (8.7% v. 5.9%, P < 0.01) with increases in test positivity, from 7.7% in 2003 to 10% in 2005, relating mainly to increases in positive tests among females aged less than 25 years. There was no increase in testing or detection among those aged 25 years and older at intervention practices. Conclusions: Introducing free GP visits for under-25 year olds living in rural and lower socioeconomic areas in New Zealand was associated with a significant increase in testing and detection for C. trachomatis in the target age group. This observational intervention supports the ongoing provision of free adolescent primary sexual health care.
Additional keywords: adolescents, Chlamydia trachomatis, general practice, intervention.
Acknowledgements
We greatly appreciate Andrew Winnington’s invaluable help with initial data collection during his summer studentship, supported by the Waikato Clinical School of Medicine. We thank Regan Webb for his help in providing population data and are grateful to the community laboratories for providing data, in particular, Bruce Davidson, Chris Pickett and David Scarrow. The Waikato Ethics Committee granted ethical approval. This study was supported by a summer studentship grant from the Waikato Clinical School of Medicine.
[1]
[2] Aral S, Roegner R. Mathematical modeling as a tool in STD prevention and control: a decade of progress, a millennium of opportunities. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27 556–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | [verified May 2009]
[7] Scott KM, Marwick C, Crampton PR. Utilization of general practitioner services in New Zealand and its relationship with income, ethnicity and government subsidy. Health Serv Manage Res 2003; 16 45–55.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
[8] Rietmeijer CA, Alfonsi GA, Douglas JM, Lloyd LV, Richardson DB. Trends in clinic visits and diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections after the introduction of a co-payment in a sexually transmitted infection clinic. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 243–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
[9] Moses SM, Bradley JE, Nagelkerke NJ, Malisa MA, Plummer FA. Impact of user fees on attendance at a referral centre for sexually transmitted diseases in Kenya. Lancet 1992; 340 463–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
[10] Crampton P, Jatrana S, Lay-Yee R, Davis P. Exposure to primary medical care in New Zealand: number and duration of general practitioner visits. N Z Med J 2007; 120 U2582.
| PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
[11] Dickson N. Where young people with multiple sexual partners seek medical care: implications for screening for chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74 445–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
[12] Bennett S, McNicholas A, Garrett N. Screening and diagnostic practices for chlamydia infections in New Zealand. N Z Med J 2001; 114 349–52.
| CAS | PubMed |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
[13]