Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Different patterns of herpes simplex virus type 1 infection among college students from Cuernavaca, Mexico

R. Carlos Arriaga-Demeza A , Carlos J. Conde-Glez A , Felipe J. Uribe-Salas A , Sergio Eguiza-Fano B , Santa García-Cisneros A and Miguel A. Sánchez-Alemán A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Sta. Maria Ahuacatitlan, Cuernavaca, Morelos CP62508, Mexico.

B Morelos State University, Av. Universidad 1001. Col. Chamilpa. Cuernavaca, Morelos CP62209, Mexico.

C Corresponding author. Email: msanchez@insp.mx

Sexual Health 5(4) 365-367 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH08020
Submitted: 12 March 2008  Accepted: 18 July 2008   Published: 18 November 2008

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) seroprevalence among college students from Morelos State University, Mexico; and to correlate their demographic and sexual behaviour characteristics with HSV-1 infection. Demographic characteristics were associated with HSV-1 among female students. Among male students, sexual behaviour characteristics were associated with HSV-1 seroprevalence. Male students who practised oral sex and did not always use a condom presented higher rates of HSV-1 infection (76.9%) than students who did not have oral sex (52.2%). A different pattern of HSV-1 infection depends on gender among Mexican students analysed.

Additional keywords: gender difference, HSV-1 seroprevalence.


References


[1] Roberts CM,  Pfister JR,  Spear SJ. Increasing proportion of herpes simplex virus type 1 as a cause of genital herpes infection in college students. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30 797–800.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[2] Tran T,  Druce JD,  Catton MC,  Kelly H,  Birch CJ. Changing epidemiology of genital herpes simplex virus infection in Melbourne, Australia, between 1980 and 2003. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 277–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[3] Scoular A,  Norrie J,  Gillespie G,  Mir N,  Carman WF. Longitudinal study of genital infection by herpes simplex virus type 1 in western Scotland over 15 years. BMJ 2002; 324 1366–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[4] Lafferty WE,  Downey L,  Celum C,  Wald A. Herpes simplex virus type 1 as a cause of genital herpes: Impact on surveillance and prevention. J Infect Dis 2000; 181 1454–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[5] Sánchez-Martínez D,  Schmid DS,  Whittington W,  Brown D,  Reeves WC,  Chatterjee S, et al. Evaluation of a test based on Baculovirus-expressed glycoprotein G for detection of herpes simplex virus type-specific antibodies. J Infect Dis 1991; 164 1196–9.
PubMed |

[6] Zhang J,  Yu KF. What’s the relative risk?: A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280 1690–1.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[7] Nahmias AJ,  Lee FK,  Beckman-Nahmias S. Sero-epidemiological patterns of herpes simplex virus infection in the world. Scand J Infect Dis 1990; 69 19–36.
CAS |

[8] Smith JS,  Robinson NJ. Age-specific prevalence of infection with herpes simplex virus types 2 and 1: A global review. J Infect Dis 2002; 186 S3–28.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[9] Sánchez-Alemán MA,  Conde-Glez CJ,  Uribe-Salas F. Core group approach to identify college students at risk for sexually transmitted infections. Rev Saude Publica 2008; 42 428–36.
PubMed |