Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Attitudes to chlamydia screening in general practice among Australian university students: a pilot study

Bernadette Zakher A C and Melissa Kang B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Sydney Medical Program, Department of General Practice, PO Box 154, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

B Department of General Practice, The University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, PO Box 154, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: bzak2745@gmp.usyd.edu.au

Sexual Health 5(4) 359-363 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07097
Submitted: 11 December 2007  Accepted: 11 March 2008   Published: 18 November 2008

Abstract

Background: Chlamydia screening of sexually active young people in general practice is key to the Australian National Sexually Transmissible Infections Strategy 2005–2008. Overseas research indicates that young people have positive attitudes towards opportunistic screening by a general practitioner (GP). This pilot study aims to investigate the attitudes of Australian university students towards chlamydia screening in primary care. Methods: Students (16–25 years) attending a class in one of three faculties at the University of Sydney participated by completing a questionnaire, which collected information about demographics, sexual history, chlamydia knowledge, attitudes towards and preferences for chlamydia screening. Results: One hundred and eighty-five students (78% female) returned questionnaires (participation rate 92%). Arts students were younger, more likely to be sexually active and to report having little or no knowledge of chlamydia. Males in the study were less likely to have had sex as a group compared to the group of females in the sample. Science students were also less likely to have had sex compared to their counterparts in other faculties. Seventy-six percent of students were comfortable with opportunistic testing for chlamydia by their GP. Reasons for not being comfortable included ‘don’t think I’m at risk’ (65%) and ‘not comfortable discussing sexual matters with my GP’ (38%). Although comfortable with GP-based testing, the likelihood of being tested in the upcoming year for most students was low, as was personal concern about chlamydia infection. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the most at risk group for chlamydia infection is not well educated about their risk of infection. The limited numbers of tests among sexually active individuals in this sample indicate that health practitioners are not screening this high-risk group for chlamydia infection.

Additional keywords: primary health care, sexually transmissible infections, young people.


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students who participated and staff of the Arts, Science and Education faculties who provided time within their teaching schedules to conduct this survey.


References


[1] Department of Health and Ageing. National Sexually Transmissible Infections Strategy 2005–2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2005.

[2] Chan DJ,  Bradford DL. A sexual health strategy for Australia – time for action. Sex Health 2004; 1 197–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | [Verified 4 April 2008]

[4] Kaiser Family Foundation, Hoff T , Greene L , Davis J . National survey of adolescents and young adults: Sexual health knowledge, attitudes, experiences. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2003.

[5] Serlin M,  Shafer MA,  Tebb K,  Gyamfi AA,  Moncada J,  Schachter J, et al. What sexually transmitted disease screening method does the adolescent prefer? Adolescents’ attitudes toward first-void urine, self-collected vaginal swab, and pelvic examination. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156 588–91.
PubMed |

[6] Tebb KP,  Puck MH,  Pai-Dhungat MR,  Gyamfi AA,  Schafer MAB. Home STI testing: the adolescent female’s opinion. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35 462–7.
PubMed |

[7] Pavlin NL,  Gunn JM,  Parker R,  Fairley CK,  Hocking J. Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health 2006; 6 221.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[8] Mills N,  Daker-White G,  Graham A,  Campbell R. Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened. Fam Pract 2006; 23 550–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[9] Duncan B,  Hart G. Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. BMJ 1999; 318 931–3.
CAS | PubMed |

[10] Smith A , Agius P , Dyson S , Mitchell A , Pitts M . Secondary students and sexual health 2002 (Monograph Series No. 47). Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University; 2003.

[11] De Visser R,  Smith A,  Richters J. Can we generalise to other young people from studies of sexual risk behaviour among university students? Aust N Z J Public Health 2005; 29 436–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Grunseit A. Sex and the school leaver: a comparison of the sexual practice of university and technical college students. Venereology 2001; 14 15–9.