Considerations for early career conservation researchers seeking to engage across communities and cultures
Joe Duggan A * and Erame Sokini BA Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University, 42A Linnaeus Way, Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
B Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Pacific Conservation Biology 28(5) 383-392 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC21032
Submitted: 21 May 2021 Accepted: 9 July 2021 Published: 21 September 2021
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
As conservation researchers operating in the Pacific, we often seek to contribute to solutions through integrative research that involves the inclusion of different voices, knowledge systems and actors in order to build adaptive capacity and ensure system resilience. Implicit in this approach is the need for sound and effective cross-cultural communication skills in a setting where an ill-defined or inexperienced approach could do more harm than good. In this perspective essay, we draw upon the literature and our own lived experiences to offer practical advice for early career researchers (ECRs) in the area of conservation research seeking to engage across communities and cultures. This manuscript is not designed to be a definitive set of rules, but a useful resource with practical advice to help empower ECRs from the Global North to engage with communities across the Pacific.
Keywords: global south, institutional change, Pacific, trust, reflexivity, boundary spanning, co-production, knowledge trust.
References
Adams, EA, and Boateng, GO (2018). Are urban informal communities capable of co-production? The influence of community–public partnerships on water access in Lilongwe, Malawi. Environment and Urbanization 30, 461–480.| Are urban informal communities capable of co-production? The influence of community–public partnerships on water access in Lilongwe, Malawi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Airhihenbuwa, CO, Shisana, O, Zungu, N, et al. (2011). Research capacity building: a US–South African partnership. Global Health Promotion 18, 27–35.
| Research capacity building: a US–South African partnership.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21596937PubMed |
Aldrich, H, and Herker, D (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy Management Review 2, 217–230.
| Boundary spanning roles and organization structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alexander, KA, Hobday, AJ, Cvitanovic, C, et al. (2019). Progress in integrating natural and social science in marine ecosystem-based management research. Marine and Freshwater Research 70, 71–83.
| Progress in integrating natural and social science in marine ecosystem-based management research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Amano, T, González-Varo, JP, and Sutherland, WJ (2016). Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoS Biology 14, e2000933.
| Languages are still a major barrier to global science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28033326PubMed |
Arnstein, SR (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35, 216–224.
| A ladder of citizen participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bang, M, and Medin, D (2010). Cultural processes in science education: supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science & Education 94, 1008–1026.
| Cultural processes in science education: supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bednarek, AT, Wyborn, C, Cvitanovic, C, et al. (2018). Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives. Sustainability Science 13, 1175–1183.
| Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30147800PubMed |
Belhabib, D (2021). Ocean science and advocacy work better when decolonized. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5, 709–710.
| Ocean science and advocacy work better when decolonized.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Berger, R (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 15, 219–234.
| Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bromham, L, Dinnage, R, and Hua, X (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature 534, 684–687.
| Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27357795PubMed |
Campbell, LM, Gray, NJ, Meletis, ZA, et al. (2006). Gatekeepers and keymasters: dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork. Geographical Review 96, 97–121.
| Gatekeepers and keymasters: dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campbell, LK, Svendsen, ES, and Roman, LA (2016). Knowledge co-production at the research–practice interface: embedded case studies from urban forestry. Environmental Management 57, 1262–1280.
| Knowledge co-production at the research–practice interface: embedded case studies from urban forestry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26902482PubMed |
Cisternas, J, Wehi, PM, Haupokia, N, et al. (2019). ‘Get together, work together, write together’: a novel framework for conservation of New Zealand frogs. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 43, 3392.
| ‘Get together, work together, write together’: a novel framework for conservation of New Zealand frogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clark, T (2008). We’re over-researched here! Sociology 42, 953–970.
| We’re over-researched here!Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cobigo, V, Martin, L, and Mcheimech, R (2016). Understanding community. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 5, 181.
| Understanding community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coleman, K, and Stern, MJ (2018). Boundary spanners as trust ambassadors in collaborative natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61, 291–308.
| Boundary spanners as trust ambassadors in collaborative natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cornell, S, Berkhout, F, Tuinstra, W, et al. (2013). Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environmental Science & Policy 28, 60–70.
| Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Creed-Kanashiro, H, Oré, B, Scurrah, M, et al. (2005). Conducting research in developing countries: experiences of the informed consent process from community studies in Peru. Journal of Nutrition 135, 925–928.
| Conducting research in developing countries: experiences of the informed consent process from community studies in Peru.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cvitanovic, C, and Hobday, AJ (2018). Building optimism at the environmental science–policy–practice interface through the study of bright spots. Nature Communications 9, 1–5.
| Building optimism at the environmental science–policy–practice interface through the study of bright spots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cvitanovic, C, Crimp, S, Fleming, A, et al. (2016a). Linking adaptation science to action to build food secure Pacific Island communities. Climate Risk Management 11, 53–62.
| Linking adaptation science to action to build food secure Pacific Island communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cvitanovic, C, McDonald, J, and Hobday, AJ (2016b). From science to action: principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management 183, 864–874.
| From science to action: principles for undertaking environmental research that enables knowledge exchange and evidence-based decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27665124PubMed |
Cvitanovic, C, Howden, M, Colvin, RM, et al. (2019). Maximising the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks. Environmental Science & Policy 94, 20–31.
| Maximising the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davidson, S (1998). Spinning the wheel. Planning 1262, 14–15.
D’Cruz, H, Gillingham, P, and Melendez, S (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work 37, 73–90.
| Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dick, M, Rous, AM, Nguyen, VM, and Cooke, SJ (2017). Necessary but challenging: multiple disciplinary approaches to solving conservation problems. Facets 1, 67–82.
| Necessary but challenging: multiple disciplinary approaches to solving conservation problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Duchelle, AE, Biedenweg, K, Lucas, C, et al. (2009). Graduate students and knowledge exchange with local stakeholders: possibilities and preparation. Biotropica 41, 578–585.
| Graduate students and knowledge exchange with local stakeholders: possibilities and preparation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Engin, M (2011). Research diary: a tool for scaffolding. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 10, 296–306.
| Research diary: a tool for scaffolding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ermine, W (2007). The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal 6, 193–203.
Fritsch O, Newig J (2012) Participatory governance and sustainability: findings of a meta-analysis of stakeholder involvement in environmental decision making. In ‘Reflexive governance for global public goods book.’ (Eds E Brousseau, T Dedeurwaerdere, B Siebenhüner) pp. 181–203. (The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA)
Fulmer, CA, and Gelfand, MJ (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust. Journal of Management 38, 1167–1230.
| At what level (and in whom) we trust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gavin, MC, McCarter, J, Mead, A, et al. (2015). Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30, 140–145.
| Defining biocultural approaches to conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gray, L, Elgert, L, and WinklerPrins, A (2020). Theorizing urban agriculture: north–south convergence. Agriculture and Human Values 37, 869–883.
| Theorizing urban agriculture: north–south convergence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Growe, A (2019). Developing trust in face-to-face interaction of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). Regional Studies 53, 720–730.
| Developing trust in face-to-face interaction of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gulrajani, N, and Moloney, K (2012). Globalizing public administration: today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public Administration Review 72, 78–86.
| Globalizing public administration: today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hakkarainen, V, Daw, TM, and Tengö, M (2020). On the other end of research: exploring community-level knowledge exchanges in small-scale fisheries in Zanzibar. Sustainability Science 15, 281–295.
| On the other end of research: exploring community-level knowledge exchanges in small-scale fisheries in Zanzibar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haslam, SA, Eggins, RA, and Reynolds, KJ (2003). The ASPIRe model: actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 76, 83–113.
| The ASPIRe model: actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herr K, Anderson G (2012) The continuum of positionality in action research. In ‘The action research dissertation: a guide for students.’ pp. 29–48. (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA).
Hofstede G (2001) ‘Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations’, 2nd edn. (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA)
Horta, H, and Santos, JM (2016). The impact of publishing during PhD studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations. Research in Higher Education 57, 28–50.
| The impact of publishing during PhD studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hussain, S, Sanders, EB-N, and Steinert, M (2012). Participatory design with marginalized people in developing countries: challenges and opportunities experienced in a field study in Cambodia the role and function of ideation spaces in the innovation process view project. International Journal of Design 6, 91–109.
IPCC (2014) ‘Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.’ (Eds Core Writing Team, RK Pachauri, LA Meyer) 151 pp. (IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland)
IPCC (2018) ‘Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.’ (Eds V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, H-O Pörtner, D Roberts, J Skea, PR Shukla, A Pirani, W Moufouma-Okia, C Péan, R Pidcock, S Connors, JBR Matthews, Y Chen, X Zhou, MI Gomis, E Lonnoy, T Maycock, M Tignor, T Waterfield) (IPCC/WMO: Geneva, Switzerland)
Jupiter, S (2017). Culture, kastom and conservation in Melanesia: what happens when worldviews collide? Pacific Conservation Biology 23, 139–145.
| Culture, kastom and conservation in Melanesia: what happens when worldviews collide?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly, R, Mackay, M, Nash, KL, et al. (2019). Ten tips for developing interdisciplinary socio-ecological researchers. Socio-Ecological Practice Research 1, 149–161.
| Ten tips for developing interdisciplinary socio-ecological researchers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kisfalvi, V, and Oliver, D (2015). Creating and maintaining a safe space in experiential learning. Journal of Management Education 39, 713–740.
| Creating and maintaining a safe space in experiential learning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knaggård, Å, Ness, B, and Harnesk, D (2018). Finding an academic space: reflexivity among sustainability researchers. Ecology and Society 23, –20.
| Finding an academic space: reflexivity among sustainability researchers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lacey, J, Howden, M, Cvitanovic, C, and Colvin, RM (2018). Understanding and managing trust at the climate science–policy interface. Nature Climate Change 8, 22–28.
| Understanding and managing trust at the climate science–policy interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawrence, A (2006). ‘No personal motive?’ Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place and Environment 9, 279–298.
| ‘No personal motive?’ Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lebel, J, and McLean, R (2018). A better measure of research from the global south. Nature 559, 23–26.
| A better measure of research from the global south.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29973734PubMed |
Leung, TKP, and Yee-kwong Chan, R (2003). Face, favour and positioning – a Chinese power game. European Journal of Marketing 37, 1575–1598.
| Face, favour and positioning – a Chinese power game.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Long, JC, Cunningham, FC, and Braithwaite, J (2013). Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 13, 158.
| Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23631517PubMed |
Marcella, R, Lockerbie, H, Bloice, L, et al. (2018). The effects of the research excellence framework research impact agenda on early- and mid-career researchers in library and information science. Journal of Information Science 44, 608–618.
| The effects of the research excellence framework research impact agenda on early- and mid-career researchers in library and information science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCarter, J, Sterling, EJ, Jupiter, SD, et al. (2018). Biocultural approaches to developing well-being indicators in Solomon Islands. Ecology and Society 23, 32.
| Biocultural approaches to developing well-being indicators in Solomon Islands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mcleod, E, Bruton-Adams, M, Förster, J, et al. (2019). Lessons from the Pacific Islands – adapting to climate change by supporting social and ecological resilience. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 1–7.
| Lessons from the Pacific Islands – adapting to climate change by supporting social and ecological resilience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Metcalf, EC, Mohr, JJ, Yung, L, et al. (2015). The role of trust in restoration success: public engagement and temporal and spatial scale in a complex social-ecological system. Restoration Ecology 23, 315–324.
| The role of trust in restoration success: public engagement and temporal and spatial scale in a complex social-ecological system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Minkov M (2013) ‘Cross-cultural analysis: the science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA)
Moon, K, and Blackman, D (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology 28, 1167–1177.
| A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24962114PubMed |
Moon, K, Adams, VM, and Cooke, B (2019a). Shared personal reflections on the need to broaden the scope of conservation social science. People and Nature 1, 426–434.
| Shared personal reflections on the need to broaden the scope of conservation social science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moon, K, Blackman, DA, Adams, VM, et al. (2019b). Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, 294–302.
| Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moretto, L, Faldi, G, Ranzato, M, et al. (2018). Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the Global South. Environment and Urbanization 30, 425–443.
| Challenges of water and sanitation service co-production in the Global South.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moser, SC (2016). Can science on transformation transform science? Lessons from co-design. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 20, 106–115.
| Can science on transformation transform science? Lessons from co-design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Müller, R (2014). Postdoctoral life scientists and supervision work in the contemporary university: a case study of changes in the cultural norms of science. Minerva 52, 329–349.
| Postdoctoral life scientists and supervision work in the contemporary university: a case study of changes in the cultural norms of science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nadin, S, and Cassell, C (2006). The use of a research diary as a tool for reflexive practice: some reflections from management research. Qualitative Research Accounting and Management 3, 208–217.
| The use of a research diary as a tool for reflexive practice: some reflections from management research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nel, JL, Roux, DJ, Driver, A, et al. (2016). Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology 30, 176–188.
| Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26041340PubMed |
Nicholas, D, Rodríguez-Bravo, B, Watkinson, A, et al. (2017). Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices. Learned Publishing 30, 205–217.
| Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicholas, D, Watkinson, A, Abrizah, A, et al. (2018). What publishers can take away from the latest early career researcher research. Learned Publishing 31, 249–253.
| What publishers can take away from the latest early career researcher research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicholls, R (2009). Research and Indigenous participation: critical reflexive methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12, 117–126.
| Research and Indigenous participation: critical reflexive methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Norström, AV, Cvitanovic, C, Löf, MF, et al. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3, 182–190.
| Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Österblom, H, Jouffray, JB, Folke, C, and Rockström, J (2017). Emergence of a global science–business initiative for ocean stewardship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 9038–9043.
| Emergence of a global science–business initiative for ocean stewardship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28784792PubMed |
Pereira, L, Frantzeskaki, N, Hebinck, A, et al. (2020). Transformative spaces in the making: key lessons from nine cases in the global south. Sustainability Science 15, 161–178.
| Transformative spaces in the making: key lessons from nine cases in the global south.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Polanyi, M, and Cockburn, L (2003). Opportunities and pitfalls of community-based research: a case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 9, 16–25.
Polk, M (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures 65, 110–122.
| Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Popa, F, Guillermin, M, and Dedeurwaerdere, T (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures 65, 45–56.
| A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raitskaya, L, and Tikhonova, E (2020). Overcoming cultural barriers to scholarly communication in international peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Language and Education 6, 4–8.
| Overcoming cultural barriers to scholarly communication in international peer-reviewed journals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rayne, A, Byrnes, G, Collier-Robinson, L, et al. (2020). Centring indigenous knowledge systems to re-imagine conservation translocations. People and Nature 2, 512–526.
| Centring indigenous knowledge systems to re-imagine conservation translocations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reed, MS, Stringer, LC, Fazey, I, et al. (2014). Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 146, 337–345.
| Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25194520PubMed |
Reed, MS, Vella, S, Challies, E, et al. (2018). A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology 26, S7–S17.
| A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rix, EF, Barclay, L, and Wilson, S (2014). Can a white nurse get it? ‘Reflexive practice’ and the non-indigenous clinician/researcher working with Aboriginal people. Rural Remote Health 14, 2679.
| Can a white nurse get it? ‘Reflexive practice’ and the non-indigenous clinician/researcher working with Aboriginal people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24888352PubMed |
Sol, J, van der Wal, MM, Beers, PJ, and Wals, AEJ (2018). Reframing the future: the role of reflexivity in governance networks in sustainability transitions. Environmental Education Research 24, 1383–1405.
| Reframing the future: the role of reflexivity in governance networks in sustainability transitions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Song, AM, Temby, O, Kim, D, et al. (2019). Measuring, mapping and quantifying the effects of trust and informal communication on transboundary collaboration in the great lakes fisheries policy network. Global Environmental Change 54, 6–18.
| Measuring, mapping and quantifying the effects of trust and informal communication on transboundary collaboration in the great lakes fisheries policy network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stefanoudis, PV, Licuanan, WY, Morrison, TH, et al. (2021). Turning the tide of parachute science. Current Biology 31, R184–R185.
| Turning the tide of parachute science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33621503PubMed |
Sterling, E, Ticktin, T, Morgan, TKK, et al. (2017). Culturally grounded indicators of resilience in social-ecological systems. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 8, 63–95.
| Culturally grounded indicators of resilience in social-ecological systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stern, MJ, and Coleman, KJ (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 28, 117–132.
| The multidimensionality of trust: applications in collaborative natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stock, P, and Burton, RJF (2011). Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability 3, 1090–1113.
| Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Storper, M, and Venables, AJ (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. The Journal of Economic Geography 4, 351–370.
| Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sukarieh, M, and Tannock, S (2013). On the problem of over-researched communities: the case of the Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon. Sociology 47, 494–508.
| On the problem of over-researched communities: the case of the Shatila Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Summers, A, and Kriwoken, L (2015). The role of intermediaries in managing environmental problems: three coastal case studies from Tasmania, Australia. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs 7, 203–216.
| The role of intermediaries in managing environmental problems: three coastal case studies from Tasmania, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Temper, L, McGarry, D, and Weber, L (2019). From academic to political rigour: insights from the ‘Tarot’ of transgressive research. Ecological Economics 164, 106379.
| From academic to political rigour: insights from the ‘Tarot’ of transgressive research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tengö, M, Hill, R, Malmer, P, et al. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond – lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27, 17–25.
| Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond – lessons learned for sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tilley, S, and Gormley, L (2007). Canadian university ethics review. Qualitative Inquiry 13, 368–387.
| Canadian university ethics review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tippett, J, Handley, JF, and Ravetz, J (2007). Meeting the challenges of sustainable development – a conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning. Progress in Planning 67, 9–98.
| Meeting the challenges of sustainable development – a conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tuck, E, and Yang, KW (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor York at New Paltz. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1, 1–40.
Warren, JR (2019). How much do you have to publish to get a job in a top sociology department? Or to get tenure? Trends over a generation. Social Science 6, 172–196.
| How much do you have to publish to get a job in a top sociology department? Or to get tenure? Trends over a generation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilkinson, S (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum 11, 493–502.
| The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams, P (2013). We are all boundary spanners now? International Journal of Public Sector Management 26, 17–32.
| We are all boundary spanners now?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wittmayer, JM, and Schäpke, N (2014). Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science 9, 483–496.
| Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolff, MG, Cockburn, JJ, De Wet, C, et al. (2019). Exploring and expanding transdisciplinary research for sustainable and just natural resource management. Ecology and Society 24, 14.
| Exploring and expanding transdisciplinary research for sustainable and just natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Young, N, Nguyen, VM, Corriveau, M, et al. (2016). Knowledge users’ perspectives and advice on how to improve knowledge exchange and mobilization in the case of a co-managed fishery. Environmental Science & Policy 66, 170–178.
| Knowledge users’ perspectives and advice on how to improve knowledge exchange and mobilization in the case of a co-managed fishery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |