Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relative salinity tolerance of freshwater macroinvertebrates from the south-east Eastern Cape, South Africa compared with the Barwon Catchment, Victoria, Australia

Ben J. Kefford A C , Carolyn G. Palmer B and Dayanthi Nugegoda A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Biotechnology and Environmental Biology, School of Applied Science, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.

B Unilever Centre for Environmental Water Quality, Institute for Water Research (IWR), Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown, 6140, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

C Corresponding author. Email: ben.kefford@rmit.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 56(2) 163-171 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04098
Submitted: 13 May 2004  Accepted: 3 February 2005   Published: 12 April 2005

Abstract

Salinity is rising in many southern African and Australian rivers with unknown effects on aquatic organisms. The extent of spatial variation, at any scale, in salt tolerances of aquatic organisms is unknown, so whether data from one location is applicable elsewhere is also unknown. The acute tolerances (72-h median lethal concentration (LC50)) to sea salt of 49 macroinvertebrate taxa from the south-east Eastern Cape (SEEC), South Africa were compared with those of 57 species from the Barwon Catchment, Victoria, Australia. The mean LC50 values from both locations were similar (Barwon: 31 and SEEC: 32 mS cm−1) and less abundant (rare) taxa tended to be more tolerant than more abundant (common) taxa. There was, however, a greater range of LC50 values (5.5–76 mS cm−1) in the Barwon Catchment than in the SEEC (11–47 mS cm−1). The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for SEEC taxa was bimodal whereas the Barwon Catchment’s SSD had a single peak. With few exceptions, members of an order had similar tolerances in both locations. The differences in SSD between locations were related to crustacean, odonate and non-arthropod relative richness. Although it is not ideal to extrapolate SSDs from one location to another, it may be reasonable to assume similar salinity tolerances among related taxa.

Extra keywords: acute salinity tolerance, ecotoxicity, rarity, stream invertebrates.


Acknowledgments

A visit by BJK to South Africa was made possible by a Land and Water Australia travelling fellowship (project no. RMI 11) and an RMIT travel grant and UCEW-IWR provided running costs and in-kind contributions; BJK was also supported by an RMIT Ph.D. scholarship. We appreciate the assistance of Larisa Pakhomova, John Midgley, Ntomboxolo Valisa, Rupert Jackson, Ferdy de Moor, Helen James, Liliana Zalizniak and Wilson Lennard. BJK thanks Natalie Burfurd for her understanding while he was away and Richard Marchant for extensive comments and lively discussions.


References

Aldenberg, T. , and Slob, W. (1993). Confidence limits of hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 25, 48–63.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | ASTM (1998). ‘Annual book of ASTM Standards, Water and Environmental Technology, Biological Effects and Environmental Fate, Biotechnology; Pesticides. Volume 11.05.’ (American Society for Testing and Materials: West Coshohocken, PA.)

Bayly I. A. E., and Williams W. D. (1973). ‘Inland Waters and their Ecology.’ (Longman Australia Pty Limited: Melbourne.)

Baskauf, C. J. , and Eickmeier, W. G. (1994). Comparative ecophysiology of a rare and a widespread species of Echinacea (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 81, 958–964.
Brown J. H. (1995). ‘Macroecology.’ (Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL.)

Bruce, R. D. (1985). An up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity testing. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 5, 151–157.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Canale G., Papas P. J., Nicol M., Kefford B. J., Crowther D., and McKay S. (2001). Preliminary assessment of the health of the Barwon River catchment in the absence of saline water disposal. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne.

Cao, Y. , and Williams, D. D. (1999). Rare species are important in bioassessment (Reply to comment by Marchant). Limnology and Oceanography 44, 1841–1842.
Dallas H. F., and Day J. A. (1993). The effect of water quality variables on riverine ecosystems: a review. Report no TT 61/93. Water Research Commission of South Africa, Pretoria.

Day J. A., Stewart B. A., de Moor I. L., and Louw A. E. (2001). Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa, Volume 4: Crustacea. Report no TT 141/01. Water Research Commission of South Africa, Pretoria.

DWA (1986). Management of the Water Resources of the Republic of South Africa. Department of Water Affairs, Pretoria, South Africa.

Forbes, A. T. , and Allanson, B. R. (1970a). Ecology of the Sundays River Part II. Osmoregulation in some mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Hydrobiologia 36, 489–503.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gaston K. J. (1994). ‘Rarity.’ (Chapman & Hall: London.)

Goetsch, P. A. , and Palmer, C. G. (1997). Salinity tolerance of selected macroinvertebrates of the Sabie River, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 32, 32–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Gordon N. D., McMahon T. A., and Finlayson B. L. (1992). ‘Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists.’ (John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex.)

Gray J. S. (1981). ‘The Ecology of Marine Sediments: An Introduction to the Structure and Function of Benthic Communities.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Greulich, S. , Bornette, G. , Amoros, C. , and Roelofs, J. G. M. (2000). Investigation on the fundamental niche of a rare species: an experiment on establishment of Luronium natans. Aquatic Botany 66, 209–224.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Haigh E. H., and Davies-Coleman H. (1999). The development of a production facility for standard laboratory test organisms for ecotoxicological research. Report no 755/1/99. Water Research Commission of South Africa, Pretoria.

Hamilton, S. J. (1995). Hazard assessment of inorganics to three endangered fish in the Green River, Utah. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 30, 134–142.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | MDBMC (1987). Salinity and drainage strategy background paper. Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council, Background Paper No. 87/1. Commonwealth, NSW, VIC, SA, QLD and ACT governments, Australia.

MDBMC (1999). The salinity audit of the Murray–Darling Basin. A 100-year perspective 1999. Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council. Commonwealth, NSW, VIC, SA, QLD and ACT governments, Australia.

Metzeling, L. (1993). Benthic macroinvertebrates community structure in streams of different salinities. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 44, 335–351.
Nielsen D. L., and Hillman T. J. (2000). Ecological effects of dryland salinity on aquatic ecosystems. Technical Report 4/2000. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Albury.

OECD (1996). ‘Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals.’ (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris.)

O’Keeffe, J. H. , and de Moor, F. C. (1988). Changes in the physico-chemistry and benthic invertebrates of the Great Fish River, South Africa, following an interbasin transfer of water. Regulated Rivers Research Management 2, 39–55.
Smith P. J. (2002). ‘Analysis of Failure and Survival Data.’ (Chapman & Hall: Boca Raton, FL.)

Solomon, K. , Giesy, J. , and Jones, P. (2000). Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemical in the environment. Crop Protection 19, 649–655.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, W. D. (1987). Salinization of rivers and streams: an important environmental hazard. Ambio 16, 180–185.


Williams, W. D. , Taaffe, R. G. , and Boulton, A. J. (1991). Longitudinal distribution of macroinvertebrates in two rivers subject of salinization. Hydrobiologia 210, 151–160.