Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Invertebrate Systematics Invertebrate Systematics Society
Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > IS > IS06018
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 21(6)

Systematic status of the caridean families Gnathophyllidae Dana and Hymenoceridae Ortmann (Crustacea : Decapoda): a preliminary examination based on nuclear rDNA sequences

M. Mitsuhashi A , Y. W. Sin B , H. C. Lei B , T.-Y. Chan C and K. H. Chu B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratory of Biology, Osaka Institute of Technology, 5-16-1 Ohmiya, Asahi-ku, Osaka 535-8585, Japan.

B Department of Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N. T., Hong Kong.

C Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, 2 Pei-Ning Road, Keelung 202, Taiwan.

D Corresponding author. Email: kahouchu@cuhk.edu.hk

Invertebrate Systematics 21(6) 613-622 https://doi.org/10.1071/IS06018
Submitted: 1 June 2006  Accepted: 30 October 2007   Published: 18 December 2007

Abstract

The systematic positions of the caridean families Gnathophyllidae and Hymenoceridae are inferred based on analyses of nuclear 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genes. The phylogenetic trees based on 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA from selected species of one genus of the family Gnathophyllidae, two genera of the family Hymenoceridae, one genus of the family Anchistioididae, eight genera of the subfamily Pontoniinae and five genera of the subfamily Palaemoninae show a close relationship between Hymenoceridae, Gnathophyllidae and Pontoniinae, with the last group constituting a paraphyletic assemblage. This result concurs with the morphology of maxilla in the first zoea, but not the shape of the third maxilliped in adults, based on which Gnathophyllidae and Hymenoceridae are treated as families. Molecular analysis supports the similarities in larval morphology between Hymenoceridae, Gnathophyllidae and Pontoniinae and therefore draws into question the familial status of the former two groups.


Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank M. Takeda and I. Nishiumi of the National Science Museum, Tokyo for their suggestions and encouragements and Y. Ise of the University of Tokyo for collecting Anchistioides sp. Some of the specimens used in this study were collected by the Philippine ‘Panglao 2004’ expedition. The ‘Panglao 2004’ Marine Biodiversity Project was a collaboration between Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris (Principal Investigator, Philippe Bouchet) and University of San Carlos, Cebu City (Principal Investigator, Danilo Largo). The ‘Panglao 2004’ was supported by the Total Foundation for Biodiversity and the Sea, the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the ASEAN Regional Center for Biodiversity Conservation (ARCBC). The Philippines Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) is acknowledged for issuing a research permit on the materials collected through ‘Panglao 2004’. This work was supported by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. CUHK4419/04M) to KHC, the National Science Council, R.O.C. and the Center for Marine Bioscience and Biotechnology of the National Taiwan Ocean University to TYC.


References


Apakupakul K., Siddall M. E., Burreson E. M. (1999) Higher level relationships of leeches (Annelida: Clitellata: Euhirudinea) based on morphology and gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12, 350–359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bauer R. T. (2004). ‘Remarkable Shrimps: Adaptations and Natural History of the Carideans.’ (University of Okalahoma Press: Norman, OK, USA)

Bruce A. J. (1986) Observation on the family Gnathophyllidae Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Decapoda). Journal of Crustacean Biology 6, 463–470.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bruce A. J. (1988) A note on the first zoeal stage larva of Hymenocera picta Dana (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae). The Beagle, Records of the Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences 5, 119–124. open url image1

Bruce A. J., Okuno J., Li X. (2005) Manipontonia gen. nov., a new pontoniine shrimp genus for Periclimenes psamathe (De Man) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae). Zootaxa 926, 1–11. open url image1

Calado R., Lin J., Rhyne A. L., Araújo R., Narciso L. (2003) Marine ornamental decapods–popular, pricey, and poorly studied. Journal of Crustacean Biology 23, 963–973.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Calafiore N., Costanzo G., Giacobbe S. (1991) Mediterranean species of the genus Pontonia Latreille, 1829. I. Developmental stages of Pontonia pinnophylax (Otto, 1821) (Decapoda, Natantia, Pontoniinae) reared in the laboratory. Crustaceana 60, 52–75. open url image1

Caroli E. (1926) La zoea dei Pontoniinae. Bollettino della Societa dei naturalisti in Napoli 37, 3–5. open url image1

Chace F. A. (1992) On the classification of the Caridea (Decapoda). Crustaceana 63, 70–80. open url image1

Chace F. A., Bruce A. J. (1993) The caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine expedition, 1907–1910, Part 6: superfamily Palaemonoidea. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 543, 1–152. open url image1

Chan T. Y. (1998). ‘Shrimps and Prawns. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific Vol. 2.’ pp. 852–971. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy.)

Costanzo G., Calafiore N., Crescenti N. (1996) Mediterranean species of the genus Pontonia Latreille, 1829. II. Developmental stages of Pontonia flavomaculata Heller, 1864 (Decapoda, Natantia, Pontoniinae) Reared in the laboratory. Crustaceana 69, 773–781. open url image1

Cunningham C. W. (1997) Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 733–740.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Debelius H. (1984). ‘Armoured Knights of the Sea.’ (Alfred Kernen, Essen). [Translated from the German: Gepanzerte Meeresritter, published 1983.]

Debelius H. (1999). ‘Crustacea Guide Of The World.’ (IKAN-Unterwasserarchiv: Frankfurt, Germany.)

Ďuriš Z., Bruce A. J. (1995) A revision of the ‘petitthouarsii’ species-group of the genus Periclimenes Costa, 1844 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae). Journal of Natural History 29, 619–671.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Farris J. S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A. G., Bults C. (1994) Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315–319.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fincham A. A., and Williamson D. I. (1978). Crustacea, Decapoda: larvae VI. Caridea families: Palaemonidae and Processidae. In ‘Fiches D’identification du Zooplancton, 159/160’. (Ed. J. H. Franser.) pp. 1–8. (Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer: Copenhagen, Denmark.)

Fransen C. H. J. M. (2002) Taxonomy, phylogeny, historical biogeography, and historical ecology of the genus Pontonia Latreille (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae). Zoologische Verhandelingen 336, 1–433. open url image1

Gamba A. L. (1998) The larval development of a fresh-water prawn, Palaemon pandaliformis (Stimpson, 1871), under laboratory conditions (Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Crustaceana 71, 9–35. open url image1

Gordon I. (1935) On new or imperfectly known species of Crustacea Macrura. Journal of the Linnean Society of London 39, 307–351. open url image1

Gore R. H., Dover C. L. V., Factor J. R. (1981) Studies on decapod Crustacea from the Indian River region of Florida. XVIII. Rediscovery of Periclimenes (Periclimenes) pandionis Holthuis, 1951 (Caridea, Palaemonidae) with notes on the males and zoeal stages. Crustaceana 40, 253–265. open url image1

Gurney R. (1936). Notes on some decapod Crustacea of Bermuda. III–V. Proceedings of the General Meetings for Scientific Business of the Zoological Society of London 1936, 619–630, plates 1–7.

Gurney R. (1938) The larvae of the decapod Crustacea. Palaemonidae and Alpheidae. Great Barrier Reef Expedition, 1928–29. Scientific Reports 6, 1–60. open url image1

Gurney R., Lebour M. V. (1941) On the larvae of certain Crustacea Macrura, mainly from Bermuda. The Journal of the Linnean Society of London 41, 89–181. open url image1

Holthuis L. B. (1955) The recent genera of the caridean and stenopodidean shrimps (class Crustacea, order Decapoda, super-section Natantia) with keys for their determination. Zoologische Verhandelingen 26, 1–157. open url image1

Holthuis L. B. (1993). ‘The Recent Genera of the Caridean and Stenopodidean Shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda) with an Appendix in the order Amphionidacea.’ (Natuurhistorisch Museum: Leiden, The Netherlands.)

Huelsenbeck J. P., Crandall K. A. (1997) Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 437–466.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J., Cunningham C. W. (1996) Conbining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 152–157.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kato S., and Okuno J. (2001). ‘Shrimps and Crabs of Hachijo Island.’ (TBS-Britannica Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan.)

Kawamoto T., and Okuno J. (2003). ‘Shrimps and Crabs of Kume Island, Okinawa.’ (Hankyu Communications Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan.)

Kishino H., Hasegawa M. (1989) Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29, 170–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lebour M. V. (1925) The eggs and newly hatched larva of Typton spongicola O. G. Costa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 13, 848–853. open url image1

Li X. (2000). ‘Catalog of the genera and species of Pontoniinae Kingsley, 1878 (Decapoda, Palaemonidae).’ (Xueyuan Press: Beijing, China.)

Martin J. W., and Davis G. E. (2001). ‘An Updated Classification of the Recent Crustacea.’ (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 39, Ed. K. V. Brown.)

Medlin L., Elwood H. J., Stickel S., Sogin M. L. (1988) The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71, 491–499.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Minemizu R. (2000). ‘Marine Decapod and Stomatopod Crustaceans Mainly from Japan.’ (Bun-ichi Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan.)

Nagai T., Shokita S. (2003) Larval development of a pontoniine shrimp, Periclimenes brevicarpalis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) reared in the laboratory. Species Diversity 8, 237–265. open url image1

Nayar S. G. (1947). The newly hatched larba of Periclimenes (Ancylocaris) brevicarparis (Schenkel). Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science. Sect. B 26, 168–176.

Nylander J. A. A. (2004). MrModeltest v2.2. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Available from author at http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html

Posada D., Crandall K. A. (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14, 817–818.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Rodriguez F., Oliver J. L., Marin A., Medina J. R. (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142, 485–501.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Ronquist F. R., Huelsenbeck J. P. (2003) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19, 1572–1574.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 1114–1116. open url image1

Shokita S. (1977). Larval development of palaemonid prawn, Palaemon (Palaemon) debilis Dana from the Ryukyu Islands. Bulletin of Science & Engineering Division, University of the Ryukyus, (Mathematics & Natural Sciences) 23, 57–76.

Shokita S. (1985) Larval development of the palaemonid prawn, Macrobrachium grandimanus (Randall), reared in the laboratory, with special reference to larval dispersal. Zoological Science 2, 785–803. open url image1

Swofford D. L. (2002). ‘PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA.)

Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 4876–4882.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Whiting M. F. (2002) Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Zoologica Scripta 31, 93–104.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yang H. J., Ko H. S. (2002) First zoea of Palaemon ortmanni (Decapoda, Caridea, Palaemonidae) hatched in the laboratory, with notes on the larval morphology of the Palaemonidae. The Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology 18, 181–189. open url image1

Yang H. J., Ko H. S. (2004) Zoeal stages of Conchodytes nipponensis (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) reared in the laboratory. Journal of Crustacean Biology 24, 110–120.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yoder A. D., Irwin J. A., Payseur B. A. (2001) Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50, 408–424.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1