Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors

Tamara Tse; Yvonne Y. K. Mak-Yuen; Wesley Young; Susan Darzins

doi:10.1071/IB24008

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Previous Contents Vol 25(4)

Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors

Tamara Tse

^A ^B ^* , Yvonne Y. K. Mak-Yuen ^A ^B ^C , Wesley Young ^D and Susan Darzins

^D

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia.

^B Occupational Therapy, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Vic 3065, Australia.

^C Neurorehabilitation and Recovery, The Florey – Austin Campus, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia.

^D Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australia Catholic University, Fitzroy, Vic 3065, Australia.

^* Correspondence to: T.Tse@latrobe.edu.au

Handling Editor: Suzanne Kuys

Brain Impairment 25, IB24008 https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24008

Submitted: 29 January 2024 Accepted: 21 October 2024 Published: 11 November 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background

Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients.

Method

Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10 hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data).

Results

Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73 years (range 39–94 years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r_s = 0.33, P = 0.42) and at discharge (r_s = 0.42, P = 0.34).

Conclusion

Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.

Keywords: accelerometry, activity trackers, arm use, physical activity, rehabilitation, wearable devices, wearable electronic devices, upper extremity.

References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2018) ‘Australia’s health 2018.’ (AIHW: Canberra)

Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M (2009) How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 36(5), 452-457.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Brott T, Adams HP, Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20(7), 864-870.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Carey LM, Matyas TA (2011) Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 43(3), 257-263.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Clark ELM, Gulley LD, Hilkin AM, Rockette-Wagner B, Leach HJ, Lucas-Thompson RG, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Nadeau KJ, Scott SM, Sheeder JL, Shomaker LB (2021) Feasibility and Acceptability of Accelerometer Measurement of Physical Activity in Pregnant Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(5), 2216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Cohen J (2013) ‘Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.’ (Taylor and Francis: Hoboken)

Deloitte Access Economics (2020) The economic impact of stroke in Australia, 2020. Available at https://www.deloitte.com/au/en/services/economics/perspectives/economic-impact-stroke-australia.html

Doman CA, Waddell KJ, Bailey RR, Moore JL, Lang CE (2016) Changes in Upper-Extremity Functional Capacity and Daily Performance During Outpatient Occupational Therapy for People With Stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 70(3), 7003290040p1-7003290040p11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, Fisher M, Pandian J, Lindsay P (2022) World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. International Journal of Stroke 17(1), 18-29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS (2009) A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke 40(6), 2123-2128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Klaic M, Kapp S, Hudson P, Chapman W, Denehy L, Story D, Francis JJ (2022) Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implementation Science 17(1), 10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW (2008) Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89(9), 1693-1700.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lang CE, Waddell KJ, Klaesner JW, Bland MD (2017) A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers. Journal of Visualized Experiments 21(122), 55673.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Langerak AJ, Regterschot GRH, Evers M, Van Beijnum BF, Meskers CGM, Selles RW, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JBJ (2023) A Sensor-Based Feedback Device Stimulating Daily Life Upper Extremity Activity in Stroke Patients: A Feasibility Study. Sensors 23(13), 5868.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS (2009) Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 23(5), 429-434.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Maceira-Elvira P, Popa T, Schmid AC, Hummel FC (2019) Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 16(1), 142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Marino R, Mak-Yuen Y, Roberts E, Young W, Darzins S, Fotheringham V, Stevens N, Tse T (2021) Oral Presentations – Thursday 24 June 2021. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 68(S1), 7-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Martino Cinnera A, Picerno P, Bisirri A, Koch G, Morone G, Vannozzi G (2024) Upper limb assessment with inertial measurement units according to the international classification of functioning in stroke: a systematic review and correlation meta-analysis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 31(1), 66-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Noorkõiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI (2014) Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 11, 144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rast FM, Labruyère R (2020) Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 17(1), 148.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Stroke Foundation (n.d.) Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management. Available at https://informme.org.au/guidelines/living-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-management

Tse T, Lentin P, Douglas J, Carey LM (2022) Understanding activity participation 3-months after stroke: a mixed methodology study. Disability and Rehabilitation 44(12), 2868-2878.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB (2005) Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86(7), 1498-1501.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wang Q, Markopoulos P, Yu B, Chen W, Timmermans A (2017) Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 14(1), 20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A (2001) Assess-ing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32(7), 1635-1639.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL (2005) The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 19(3), 194-205.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |