Adsorption and desorption of phosphate on Fe2O3: effect of fulvic acid and pH
Tsanangurayi Tongesayi A B , Eric J. Byam A , Sarah B. Keysper A and Michael J. Crounce AA Department of Chemistry, Medical Technology and Physics, Monmouth University, 400 Cedar Avenue, West Long Branch, NJ 07764, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: ttongesa@monmouth.edu
Environmental Chemistry 5(2) 161-168 https://doi.org/10.1071/EN08005
Submitted: 16 January 2008 Accepted: 14 March 2008 Published: 17 April 2008
Environmental context. Adsorption controls the mobility of chemical species like nutrients in the soil and water environments and forms the basis for some of the methods of treating contaminated waters. Nutrients are introduced into environments where there are large quantities of humic substances adsorbed onto mineral oxides in the soil and sediments but no work has specifically focussed on the effect of adsorbed and free humic substances on the mobility of nutrients, and their adsorption and desorption mechanism on surface sites covered with adsorbed humic substances is still obscure. We believe that our findings and the proposed adsorption mechanism will help advance the technologies and methodologies for the removal of nutrients from wastewater.
Abstract. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of adsorbed fulvic acid (FA) on the mobility of phosphate (Pi) using Fe2O3 as the soil or sediment model. The study showed that adsorbed FA increased the amount of adsorbed Pi as a function of time and pH without it being remobilised. We envisage that Pi adsorbs onto both residual cationic surface sites and onto the adsorbed FA and that additional Pi loads onto the adsorption surface as FA–Pi precipitate. Addition of FA to Fe2O3 with adsorbed Pi resulted in the remobilisation of Pi as FA got adsorbed at pH 5.30 and 6.30. At pH 8.30, FA adsorbed without remobilising Pi. FA is a stronger base than the Pi species at pH 5.30 and 6.30 and should adsorb more strongly. At pH 8.30, FA is thought to bind onto adsorbed Pi. The experimental isotherm data could not be completely fitted into the Freundlich equation. This could be due to the complex adsorption mechanism.
Additional keywords: natural organic matter, nutrients, sorption mechanism mobility.
Acknowledgements
The authors want to acknowledge the department of chemistry, medical technology and physics at Monmouth University, Monmouth University Urban Coast Institute (UCI) and the Grant-In-Aid for Creativity from Monmouth University for financial support.
[1]
A. Violante ,
M. Pigna ,
Competitive sorption of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002
, 66, 1788.
[2]
C. P. Slomp ,
S. T. Van der Gaast ,
W. Van Raaphorst ,
Phosphorus binding by poorly crystalline iron oxides in North Sea sediments.
Mar. Chem. 1996
, 52, 55.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3]
S. Wang ,
X. Jin ,
Y. Pang ,
H. Zhao ,
X. Zhou ,
The study of the effect of pH on phosphate sorption by different trophic lake sediments.
J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005
, 285, 448.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[4]
L. Luo ,
S. Zhang ,
X. Q. Shan ,
Y. G. Zhu ,
Effects of oxalate and humic acid on arsenate sorption by and desorption from a Chinese red soil.
Water Air Soil Poll. 2006
, 176, 269.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5]
J. D. Filius ,
J. C. L. Meeussen ,
D. G. Lumsdon ,
T. Hiemstra ,
W. H. Van Riemsdijk ,
Modeling the binding of fulvic acid by goethite: the speciation of adsorbed FA molecules.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003
, 67, 1463.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6]
L. Weng ,
W. H. Van Riemsdijk ,
L. K. Koopal ,
T. Hiemstra ,
Adsorption of humic substances on goethite: comparison between humic acids and fulvic acids.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006
, 40, 7494.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[7]
D. Sarkar ,
M. E. Essington ,
K. C. Misra ,
Adsorption of mercury(II) by kaolinite.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000
, 64, 1968.
[8]
C. L. Peacock ,
D. M. Sherman ,
Copper(II) sorption onto goethite, hematite and lepidocrocite: a surface complexation model based on ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2004
, 68, 2623.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9]
G. Mustafa ,
R. S. Kookana ,
B. Singh ,
Desorption of cadmium from goethite: effects of pH, temperature and aging.
Chemosphere 2006
, 64, 856.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[10]
T. Tongesayi ,
R. B. Smart ,
Abiotic reduction mechanism of As(V) by fulvic acid in the absence of light and the effect of Fe(III).
Water S.A. 2007
, 33, 615.
[11]
T. Tongesayi ,
R. B. Smart ,
Arsenic speciation: reduction of As(V) to As(III) by fulvic acid.
Environ. Chem. 2006
, 3, 137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12]
G. R. Choppin ,
Inner versus outer sphere complexation of f-elements.
J. Alloy. Comp. 1997
, 249, 9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13]
L. H. M. Carvalho ,
T. De Koe ,
P. B. Tavares ,
An improved molybdenum blue method for simultaneous determination of inorganic phosphate and arsenate.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Restoration 1998
, 1, 13.
[14]
