Methanogen genomics to discover targets for methane mitigation technologies and options for alternative H2 utilisation in the rumen
Graeme Attwood A C and Christopher McSweeney BA Rumen Microbial Genomics, Food, Metabolism and Microbiology Section, Food and Textiles Group, Grassland Research Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
B CSIRO Livestock Industries, Queensland BioScience Precinct, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: graeme.attwood@agresearch.co.nz
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 28-37 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07203
Submitted: 9 July 2007 Accepted: 21 September 2007 Published: 2 January 2008
Abstract
Reducing ruminant methane emissions is an important objective for ensuring the sustainability of ruminant-based agriculture. Methane is formed in the rumen by methanogens (part of the domain Archaea), mainly from H2 and CO2. Methanogens from a wide range of habitats are being genome-sequenced to gain a better understanding of their biology and, in particular, to identify targets for inhibition technologies for gut-associated methanogens. Genome comparisons are identifying common genes that define a methanogen, while gene differences are providing an insight into adaptations that allow methanogen survival and persistence under different environmental conditions. Within the rumen microbial food web, methanogens perform the beneficial task of removing H2, which allows reduced cofactors to be reoxidised and recycled, thereby enhancing the breakdown and fermentation of plant material. Therefore, rumen methane mitigation strategies need to consider alternative routes of H2 utilisation in the absence (or decreased levels) of methanogenesis to maintain rumen function. Two main alternatives are possible: enhancing rumen microorganisms that carry out reductive acetogenesis (combining CO2 and H2 to form acetate) or promotion of organisms that consume reducing equivalents during the conversion of metabolic intermediates (malate, fumarate and crotonate) into propionate and butyrate. A better understanding of the role and scale of methane oxidation in the rumen may also lead to future options for methane mitigation.
Acknowledgements
Gratitude is expressed to Bill Kelly, Eric Altermann, Sinead Leahy (AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand) Stuart Denman and Mark Morrison (CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia) who were involved in the research referred to in this manuscript.
Baldwin RL,
Wood WA, Emery RS
(1963) Conversion of glucose-14C to propionate by the rumen microbiota. Journal of Bacteriology 85, 1346–1349.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
[Verified 3 November 2007].
Mitsumori M,
Ajisaka N,
Tajima K,
Kajikawa H, Kurihara M
(2002) Detection of Proteobacteria from the rumen by PCR using methanotroph-specific primers. Letters in Applied Microbiology 35, 251–255.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Morvan B,
Doré J,
Rieu-Lesme F,
Foucat L,
Fonty G, Gouet P
(1994) Establishment of hydrogen-utilizing bacteria in the rumen of the newborn lamb. FEMS Microbiology Letters 117, 249–256.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Morvan B,
Bonnemoy F,
Fonty G, Gouet P
(1996a) Quantitative determination of H2-utilizing acetogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic Archaea from digestive tract of different mammals. Current Microbiology 32, 129–133.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Morvan B,
Rieu-Lesme F,
Fonty G, Gouet P
(1996b) In vitro interactions between rumen H2-producing cellulolytic microorganisms and H2-utilizing acetogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria. Anaerobe 2, 175–180.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Nollet L,
Demeyer D, Verstraete W
(1997) Effect of 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid and Peptostreptococcus productus ATCC 35244 addition on stimulation of reductive acetogenesis in the ruminal ecosystem by selective inhibition of methanogenesis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63, 194–200.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Nollet L,
Mbanzamihigo L,
Demeyer D, Verstraete W
(1998) Effect of addition of Peptostreptococcus productus ATCC 35244 on reductive acetogenesis in the ruminal ecosystem after inhibition of methanogenesis by cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus plantarum 80. Animal Feed Science and Technology 71, 49–66.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Prins RA, Lankhorst A
(1977) Synthesis of acetate from CO2 in the cecum of some rodents. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1, 255–258.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Reeve JN,
Nolling J,
Morgan RM, Smith DR
(1997) Methanogenesis: genes, genomes and who’s on first? Journal of Bacteriology 179, 5975–5986.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Rieu-Lesme F,
Fonty G, Doré J
(1995) Isolation and characterization of a new hydrogen-utilizing bacterium from the rumen. FEMS Microbiology Letters 125, 77–82.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Rieu-Lesme F,
Dauga C,
Morvan B,
Bouvet OMM,
Grimont PAD, Doré J
(1996) Acetogenic coccoid spore-forming bacteria isolated from the rumen. Research in Microbiology 147, 753–764.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Rieu-Lesme F,
Dauga C,
Fonty G, Doré J
(1998) Isolation from the rumen of a new acetogenic bacterium phylogenetically closely related to Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 4, 89–94.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Samuel BS, Gordon JI
(2006) A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host–archaeal–bacterial mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 10011–10016.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Samuel BS,
Hansen EE,
Manchester JK,
Coutinho PM,
Henrissat B,
Fulton R,
Latreille P,
Kim K,
Wilson RK, Gordon JI
(2007) Genomic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 10643–10648.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Slesarev AI,
Mezhevaya KV,
Makarova KS,
Polushin NN, Shcherbinina OV , et al.
(2002) The complete genome of hyperthermophile Methanopyrus kandleri AV19 and monophyly of archaeal methanogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 4644–4649.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Smith DR,
Doucette-Stam LA,
Deloughry C,
Lee H, Dubois J , et al.
(1997) Complete genome sequence of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum ΔH: functional analysis and comparative genomics. Journal of Bacteriology 179, 7135–7155.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Smith PH, Hungate RE
(1958) Isolation and characterisation of Methanobacterium ruminantium n. sp. Journal of Bacteriology 75, 713–718.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Tajima K,
Aminov RI,
Nagamine T,
Ogata K,
Nakamura M,
Matsui H, Benno Y
(1999) Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 29, 159–169.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Thauer RK,
Jungermann K, Decker K
(1977) Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews 41, 100–180.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Tomkins NW, Hunter RA
(2004) Methane reduction in beef cattle using a novel antimethanogen. Animal Production in Australia 25, 329.
Turnbaugh PJ,
Ley RE,
Mahowald MA,
Magrini V,
Mardis ER, Gordon JI
(2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444, 1027–1031.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Ungerfeld EM,
Kohn RA,
Wallace RJ, Newbold CJ
(2007) A meta-analysis of fumarate effects on methane production in ruminal batch cultures. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2556–2563.
|
CAS |
Crossref |
PubMed |
Vogels GD,
Hoppe WF, Stumm CK
(1980) Association of methanogenic bacteria with rumen ciliates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 40, 608–612.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Whitford MF,
Foster RJ,
Beard CE,
Gong J, Teather RM
(1998) Phylogenetic analysis of rumen bacteria by comparative sequence analysis of cloned 16S rRNA genes. Anaerobe 4, 153–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Wolfe RS
(1982) Biochemistry of methanogenesis. Experientia 38, 198–200.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Wolin MJ, Miller TL
(2006) Control of rumen methanogenesis by inhibiting the growth and activity of methanogens with hydroxymethylglutaryl-SCoA inhibitors. International Congress Series 1293, 131–137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |