Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
REVIEW

Optimising manure management for GHG outcomes

H. G. van der Meer
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Agrosystems Research Department, Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen. Email: hugo.vandermeer@wur.nl

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 38-45 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07214
Submitted: 24 July 2007  Accepted: 1 November 2007   Published: 2 January 2008

Abstract

This paper focuses on improvements to livestock manure management to reduce environmental pollution and emission of greenhouse gases (GHG). Livestock manures contain large amounts of plant nutrients and organic matter (OM). Structural changes to livestock production and ample supply of cheap chemical fertilisers have decreased the interest and possibilities of farmers in using manure for the fertilisation of crops and grasslands and maintenance of soil fertility. As a result, many livestock producers dispose of manure as cheaply as possible causing serious pollution of soil, water and atmosphere. In addition, livestock production systems contribute to climate change by emission of the GHG carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Careful recycling of livestock manures to fertilise crops and grasslands and improve soil fertility is considered the most suitable and cost-effective option for environmentally friendly disposal. Manure management legislation in The Netherlands is described to explain the principles. These include complete collection of faeces and urine of confined livestock, adaptation of the period and rate of manure application to the N and P requirements of crops, and use of manure collection, storage and application techniques aiming at low ammonia (NH3) losses. Effects of sustainable manure management on GHG emissions are described. Optimising the period, rate and technique of manure application to crops and grassland causes effective utilisation of manure N and reduces direct and indirect losses of N2O. In addition, effective recycling of manure nutrients and OM allows a reduction in the use of chemical fertilisers and fossil energy and contributes to the maintenance or improvement of the carbon content of agricultural ecosystems. The relatively high costs of sustainable manure management stimulate farmers to optimise feed conversion and minimise manure production per unit of product by good livestock feeding and management practices. High feed conversion efficiency reduces CH4 emission by enteric fermentation and may reduce feed imports and related GHG emissions. In addition, it is shown that livestock categories differ widely in feed conversion efficiency and N and P excretion per unit of product. Finally, anaerobic digestion of livestock slurries provides a valuable energy source and reduces CH4 emission of stored slurry and, possibly, N2O emission after field application of the slurry.

Additional keywords: CH4, CO2, livestock production, manure management legislation, N, N2O.


References


Bakker GCM (1996) Interaction between carbohydrates and fat in pigs: impact on energy evaluation in feeds. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University. Available at http://library.wur.nl/way/ [Verified 15 November 2007].

Béline F, Martinez J, Chadwick D, Guiziou F, Coste C-M (1999) Factors affecting nitrogen transformations and related nitrous oxide emissions from aerobically treated piggery slurry. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 73, 235–243.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 19 November 2007].

Steinfeld H , Gerber P , Wassenaar T , Castel V , Rosales M , de Haan C (2006 b) ‘Livestock’s long shadow – environmental issues and options.’ (FAO: Rome). Available at http://www.virtualcentre.org [Verified 19 November 2007].

Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ (2001) Cattle slurry affects nitrous oxide and dinitrogen emissions from fertilizer nitrate. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 1307–1314.
CAS |
[Verified 15 November 2007].

van der Meer HG , van der Putten AHJ (1995) Reduction of nutrient emissions from ruminant livestock farms. In ‘Grassland into the 21st century: challenges and opportunities’. (Ed. GE Pollott) pp. 118–134. (British Grassland Society: Reading)

van der Meer HG , Unwin RJ , van Dijk TA , Ennik GC (Eds) (1987) ‘Animal manure on grassland and fodder crops. Fertilizer or waste? Developments in plant and soil sciences, vol. 30.’ (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht)

van Groenigen JW, Kasper GJ, Velthof GL, van den Pol-van Dasselaar A, Kuikman PJ (2004) Nitrous oxide emissions from silage maize fields under different mineral nitrogen fertilizer and slurry applications. Plant and Soil 263, 101–111.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | [Verified 16 November 2007].

Wadman WP , Sluijsmans CMJ , de la Lande Cremer LCN (1987) Value of animal manures: changes in perception. In ‘Animal manure on grassland and forage crops. Fertilizer or waste?’ (Eds HG van der Meer, RJ Unwin, TA van Dijk, GC Ennik) pp. 1–16. (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Zeeman G , Gerbens S (1999) CH4 emissions from animal manure. IPCC Workshop on Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Wageningen. Available at www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/bgp/4_3_CH4_Animal_Manure.pdf [Verified 19 November 2007].