Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from animal production systems: synergy between measuring and modelling at different scales
J. W. van Groenigen A B C , R. L. M. Schils A , G. L. Velthof A , P. J. Kuikman A , D. A. Oudendag A and O. Oenema A BA Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
B Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
C Corresponding author. Email: JanWillem.vanGroenigen@wur.nl
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 46-53 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07197
Submitted: 7 July 2007 Accepted: 10 October 2007 Published: 2 January 2008
Abstract
Animal production systems are large and complex sources of greenhouse gases (GHG), especially nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). Emissions from these systems are expected to rise over the coming decades due to the increasing global population and shifting diets, unless appropriate mitigation strategies are implemented. In this paper, we argue that the main constraints for such implementation are: (i) the complex and often poorly understood controls of GHG sources in animal production systems; (ii) the lack of knowledge on the economic and social costs involved in implementing mitigation strategies; and (iii) the strong political emphasis on mitigating nitrate leaching and ammonia volatilisation, rather than GHG emissions. We further argue that overcoming these three constraints can only be achieved by initiating integrated mitigation strategies, based on modelling and experimental work at three scales. At the ‘laboratory and field scale’, basic causal relationships with respect to processes of GHG formation and other detrimental fluxes need to be experimentally established and modelled. As management options are considered at the ‘farm scale’, this is the ideal scale to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, feasibility and possible pollution swapping effects of mitigation measures. Finally, at the ‘national and supra-national scales’, environmental legislation is implemented, effectiveness of environmental policies and emissions abatement measures are being monitored, and the social costs of various scenarios are being weighed. We illustrate the need for integral measures and working across different scales using our own work on the relationship between nitrogen surplus and fluxes to the environment. At the field scale, a clear positive relation between nitrogen surplus and N2O emission, NO3– leaching and NH3 volatilisation was experimentally established. At the farm scale, the model DAIRYWISE was used to evaluate effects of minimising nitrogen surplus on the nutrient flow and economic viability of an average Dutch dairy farm. Even after including trade-off effects of CH4 emissions from cattle and manure storage, there was still a clear positive relationship between farm gate nitrogen surplus and GHG emission. At this scale, the prime issue was balancing environmental gains with economic viability. Finally, at the ‘national and supra-national scale’ we developed the MITERRA-EUROPE model, and used it to quantify the effects on GHG emissions of environmental policies aimed at reducing NO3– leaching and NH3 volatilisation in the 27 Member States of the European Union (EU-27). This showed the intricate relationship between different environmental goals, with both positive feedback (balanced fertilisation reduced both NO3– leaching and N2O emission) and negative feedback (‘low-emission’ manure application reduced NH3 volatilisation but increased N2O emission) possible. At this scale, there is a clear need for an integral approach towards reducing environmental assessment to the environment. Our studies so far suggest that ‘balanced fertilisation’ is among the most promising mitigation measures for simultaneously lowering N2O emission, NO3– leaching and NH3 volatilisation, without pollution swapping to CH4 emission.
Additional keywords: ammonia volatilisation, methane, nitrate leaching, nitrous oxide.
Bol R,
Petersen SO,
Christofodis C,
Dittert K, Hansen MN
(2004) Short-term N2O, CO2, NH3 fluxes, and N/C transfers in a Danish grass-clover pasture after simulated urine deposition in autumn. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 167, 568–576.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Bristow AW,
Whitehead DC, Cockburn JE
(1992) Nitrogenous constituents in the urine of cattle, sheep and goats. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 59, 387–394.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Bussink DW, Oenema O
(1998) Ammonia volatilization from dairy farming systems in temperate areas: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 19–33.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Heinen M
(2006) Simplified denitrification models: overview and properties. Geoderma 133, 444–463.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Kool DM,
Hoffland E,
Abrahamse PA, van Groenigen JW
(2006a) What artificial urine composition is adequate for simulating soil N2O fluxes and mineral N dynamics? Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38, 1757–1763.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Kool DM,
Hoffland E,
Hummelink EWJ, van Groenigen JW
(2006b) Increased hippuric acid content of urine can reduce soil N2O fluxes. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38, 1021–1027.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Kreula M,
Rauramaa A, Ettala T
(1978) The effect of feeding on the hippuric acid content of cow’s urine. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 50, 372–377.
|
CAS |
Li CS,
Frolking S, Frolking TA
(1992) A model of nitrous-oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events. 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 97, 9759–9776.
|
CAS |
Misselbrook TH,
Powell JM,
Broderick GA, Grabber JH
(2005) Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1765–1777.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Mosier AR,
Kroeze C,
Nevison C,
Oenema O,
Seitzinger SP, Van Cleemput O
(1998) Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle. OECD/IPCC/IEA phase II development of IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventory methodology. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 52, 225–248.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Oenema O,
Wrage N,
Velthof GL,
van Groenigen JW,
Dolfing J, Kuikman PJ
(2005) Trends in global nitrous oxide emissions from animal production systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 72, 51–65.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Schils RLM,
Verhagen A,
Aarts HFM, Šebek LBJ
(2005) A farm level approach to define successful mitigation strategies for GHG emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71, 163–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sommer SG,
Petersen SO, Møller HB
(2004) Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 69, 143–154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Van Beek CL,
Brouwer L, Oenema O
(2003) The use of farmgate balances and soil surface balances as estimator for nitrogen leaching to surface water. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 67, 233–244.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
van Groenigen JW,
Kasper GJ,
Velthof GL,
Van den Pol-van Dasselaar A, Kuikman P
(2004) Nitrous oxide emissions from silage maize fields under different mineral nitrogen fertilizer and slurry applications. Plant and Soil 263, 101–111.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
van Groenigen JW,
Kuikman PJ,
De Groot WJM, Velthof GL
(2005a) Nitrous oxide emission from urine-treated soil as influenced by urine composition and soil physical conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37, 463–473.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
van Groenigen JW,
Velthof GL,
Van der Bolt FJE,
Vos A, Kuikman PJ
(2005b) Seasonal variation in N2O emissions from urine patches: effects of urine concentration, soil compaction and dung. Plant and Soil 273, 15–27.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
van Groenigen JW,
Palermo V,
Kool DM, Kuikman PJ
(2006) Inhibition of denitrification and N2O emission by urine-derived benzoic and hippuric acid. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38, 2499–2502.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Velthof GL, Oenema O
(1997) Nitrous oxide emission from dairy farming systems in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 45, 347–360.
|
CAS |
Velthof GL,
Brader AB, Oenema O
(1996) Seasonal variations in nitrous oxide losses from managed grasslands in the Netherlands. Plant and Soil 181, 263–274.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Velthof GL,
Nelemans JA,
Oenema O, Kuikman PJ
(2005) Gaseous nitrogen and carbon losses from pig manure derived from different diets. Journal of Environmental Quality 34, 698–706.
|
CAS |
PubMed |