Effects of inclusion of maize silage in a diet based on grass silage on the intake, apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention in wether sheep
Mladen Knežević A , Marina Vranić A C , Krešimir Bošnjak A , Darko Grbeša B , Goran Perčulija A , Josip Leto A and Hrvoje Kutnjak AA Department of Crop, Forage and Grassland Production, Centre of Grassland Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
B Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
C Corresponding author. Email: marina.vranic@gmail.com
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(12) 1408-1414 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06310
Submitted: 24 November 2006 Accepted: 22 May 2007 Published: 16 November 2007
Abstract
The objective of this experiment was to study the effects of interactions between grass silage (GS) dominated by orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and maize silage (MS) (Zea mays L.) on ad libitum intake, digestibility and nitrogen retention in wether sheep. The GS in this experiment reflected the quality of GS produced on family farms in Croatia, while the MS used is frequently produced in seasons unfavourable for high quality MS production. The study consisted of four feeding treatments involving GS and MS alone, and GS and MS mixtures in ratios of 67 : 33 or 33 : 67 (DM basis), fed twice daily. Mean DM contents of GS and MS were 396 and 264 g/kg fresh weight, respectively. MS was much lower (P < 0.001) in crude protein (CP) (62 g/kg DM) than the GS (120 g/kg DM). GS contained larger (P < 0.001) quantities of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) than MS. In contrast, MS contained more (P < 0.001) non-structural carbohydrate than GS, as starch, which comprised 211 g/kg DM. Inclusion of MS in the diet (33% v. 67%) had positive linear effects on fresh matter voluntary intake (P < 0.05), CP and starch digestibility (P < 0.05), and N balance (P < 0.05). A positive associative effect of GS and MS was observed for DM, organic matter intake (quadratic, P < 0.05), N intake and N balance (quadratic, P < 0.01), while it was negative for ADF digestibility (quadratic, P < 0.05). It was concluded that positive interactions of GS and MS were due to a better balance of available energy and protein when the two forages were fed together. No positive associative responses were recorded for digestibility, probably due to higher passage rates of digesta with MS supplementation i.e. lower MS quality in terms of maize plant maturity at harvest.
Adesogan AT,
Salawu MB, Deaville ER
(2002) The effect on voluntary feed intake, in vivo digestibility and nitrogen balance in sheep of feeding grass silage or pea-wheat intercrops differing in pea to wheat ratio and maturity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 96, 161–173.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andrews RP,
Escuder-Volonte J,
Curran MA, Holmes W
(1972) The influence of supplements of energy and protein on the intake and performance of cattle fed on cereal straw. Animal Production 15, 167–176.
Anil L,
Park J, Phipps RH
(2000) The potential of forage-maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 157–164.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beever DE,
Dhanoa MS,
Losada HR,
Evans RJ,
Cammell SB, France J
(1986) The effect of forage species and stage of harvest on the process of digestion occurring in the rumen of cattle. The British Journal of Nutrition 56, 439–454.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brandt RT, Klopfestein TJ
(1986) Evaluation of alfalfa-corn cob associative action. II. Comparative tests of alfalfa hay as a source of ruminal degradable protein. Journal of Animal Science 63, 902–910.
| PubMed |
Browne EM,
Juniper DT,
Bryant MJ, Beever DE
(2005) Apparent digestibility and nitrogen utilisation of diets based on maize and grass silage fed to beef steers. Animal Feed Science 119, 55–68.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Firkins JL,
Eastridge ML,
St-Pierre NR, Noftsger SM
(2001) Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science Suppl. E 79, E218–E238.
Fraser MD,
Fychan R, Jones R
(2000) Voluntary intake, digestibility and nitrogen utilization by sheep fed ensiled forage legumes. Grass and Forage Science 55, 271–279.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haddad SG
(2000) Associative effects of supplementing barley straw diets with alfalfa hay on rumen environment and nutrient intake and digestibility for ewes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 87, 163–171.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hameleers A
(1998) The effect of the inclusion of either maize silage, fermented whole crop wheat or urea-treated whole crop wheat in a diet based on a high quality grass silage on the performance of dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 53, 157–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hegarty RS
(2004) Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 459–467.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Highfill BD,
Boggs DL,
Amos HE, Crickman JG
(1987) Effects of high fibre energy supplements on fermentation characteristics and in vivo and in situ digestibilities of low quality fescue hay. Journal of Animal Science 65, 224.
Hunt CW,
Paterson JA, Williams JE
(1985) Intake and digestibility of alfalfa-tall fescue combinations diets fed to lambs. Journal of Animal Science 60, 301–312.
Joanning SW,
Johnson DF, Barry BP
(1981) Nutrient digestibility depressions in corn silage – corn grain mixtures fed to steers. Journal of Animal Science 53, 1095–1103.
Kaiser AG,
Dear BS, Morris SG
(2007) An evaluation of the yield and quality of oat-legume and ryegrass-legume mixtures and legume monocultures harvested at three stages of growth for silage. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 25–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Margan DE,
Moran JB, Spence FB
(1994) Energy and protein value of combinations of maize silage and red clover hay for ruminants, using adult sheep as a model. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 319–329.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matsui H,
Ushida K,
Miyazaki K, Kojima Y
(1998) Use of ration of digested xylan to digested cellulose (X/C) as an index of fibre digestion in plant cell-wall material by ruminal microorganisms. Animal Feed Science and Technology 71, 207–215.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moss AR,
Givens DI, Phipps RH
(1992) Digestibility and energy value of combinations of forage mixtures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 39, 151–172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oba M, Allen MS
(2003) Effects of corn grain conservation method on ruminal digestion kinetics for lactating dairy cows at two dietary starch concentrations. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 184–194.
O’Doherty JV,
Maher PF, Crosby TF
(1997) The performance of pregnant ewes and their progeny when offered grass silage, maize silage or a maize silage/ensiled super pressed pulp mixture during late pregnancy. Livestock Production Science 52, 11–19.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pasha TN,
Prigge EC,
Russell RW, Bryan WB
(1994) Influence of moisture content of forage diets on intake and digestion by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2455–2463.
| PubMed |
Rouzbehan Y,
Galbraith H,
Topps JH, Rooke JA
(1996) The response of sheep to big bale grass silage ensiled with, or supplemented separately with, molassed sugar beet feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 59, 279–284.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Steen RWJ,
Gordon FJ,
Dawson LE,
Park RS,
Mayne CS,
Agnew RE,
Kilpatrick DJ, Porter MG
(1998) Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 66, 115–127.
Trevaskis LM,
Fulkerson WJ, Gooden JM
(2001) Provision of certain carbohydrate-based supplements to pasture-fed sheep, as well as time of harvesting of the pasture, influences pH, ammonia concentration and microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 21–27.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Soest PJ,
Robertson JB, Lewis BA
(1991) Method for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| PubMed |
Vranić M,
Knežević M,
Leto J,
Perčulija G,
Bošnjak K,
Kutnjak H, Maslov L
(2005a) Forage quality on family farms in Croatia. Monitoring grass silage quality over the two winter feeding seasons of dairy cows. Mljekarstvo 55, 283–296.
Vranić M,
Knežević M,
Leto J,
Perčulija G,
Bošnjak K,
Kutnjak H, Maslov L
(2005b) Forage quality on family farms in Croatia. Monitoring corn silage quality over the two winter feeding seasons of dairy cows. Mljekarstvo 55, 269–282.
Wanjaiya GW,
Wales WJ, Dellow DW
(1993) Utilisation of white clover pasture and maize silage by the lactating dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53, 73–75.
Weller RF,
Rook AJ, Phipps RH
(1991) Effect on silage intake and milk production of incorporating maize silage in dairy cows rations based on grass silage of either average or high energy concentration. Animal Production [Abstract] 52, 604.
Williams YJ,
Wales WJ,
Doyle PT,
Egan AR, Stockdale CR
(2005) Effects of grain or hay supplementation on the chewing behaviour and stability of rumen fermentation of dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass-based pasture in spring. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1519–1528.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
