Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA06179
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 47(12)

Weed management on grazing properties: a survey of livestock producers in New South Wales and Victoria

A. W. van der Meulen A C , I. J. Reeve A and B. M. Sindel B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

B School of Rural Science and Agriculture, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: aschnei2@une.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(12) 1415-1421 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06179
Submitted: 19 June 2006  Accepted: 24 August 2007   Published: 16 November 2007

Abstract

Social research was conducted to explore factors influencing weed management on grazing properties in southern Australia. Face-to-face interviews were held with 122 livestock producers, 94 written questionnaires were returned and 90 grazing properties were visited and rated for weed incidence and management effort. Segmentation techniques revealed three groups, on the basis of farmer demographics and farm characteristics. These groups varied significantly in the range of control methods used, weed management effort, difficulties encountered with weed control and attitudes towards weed control. Respondents were also grouped into four categories with respect to weed control methods: minimal control, mechanical control, grazing control and maximal control. Control groups differed significantly in terms of the number and complexity of methods used, difficulties encountered with weed control, levels of weed awareness and the value placed on various sources of information about weed control. Characteristics of effective weed managers were considered and three factors were identified as underpinning success with weed control. These are referred to as the three ‘Ds’: diligence, diversity and deliberation. These factors have been used to define a three dimensional framework, within which the diversity of approaches towards weed control can be understood.

Additional keywords: adoption, extension, pastures, weeds.


Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was funded by Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA). Various other groups provided assistance but, in particular, we acknowledge the valuable feedback and involvement in the surveys by weed research and regulatory staff from the Department of Sustainability and Environment and the Department of Primary Industries in Victoria, and the Wagga Wagga and Tamworth City Councils, the Lockhart, Tumut and Gundagai Shire Councils, and the New England Weeds Authority in New South Wales. We also thank the many livestock producers who participated in our surveys.


References


Barr N, Cary J (2000) ‘Influencing improved natural resource management on farms: a guide to factors influencing the adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra)

Bullen K, Woods E (1999) Do farmers adopt new management strategies developed by researchers? Do researchers communicate their results effectively? In ‘The 12th Australian weeds conference, Hobart’. (Eds A Bishop, M Boersma, C Barnes) pp. 71–75. (Tasmanian Weeds Society, Hobart)

Burton J, Dowling P (2004) ‘Pasture management for weed control: a graziers’ guide to controlling annual weeds in southern Australian improved pastures.’ (NSW Agriculture: Orange, NSW)

Campbell M (1997) Pasture weeds. In ‘Pasture production and management’. (Eds J Lovett, JM Scott) pp. 254–268. (Inkata Press: Melbourne)

Cary J, Webb T, Barr N (2002) ‘Understanding landholders’ capacity to change to sustainable practices: insights about practice adoption and capacity to change.’ (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Canberra)

D’Emden F, Llewellyn R (2006) No-tillage adoption decisions in southern Australian cropping and the role of weed management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 563–569.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dowling P, Michalk D, Sindel B (2000) Weed management in pasture systems. In ‘Australian weed management systems’. (Ed. BM Sindel) pp. 307–326. (RG and FJ Richardson: Melbourne)

Frank B, Chamala S (1992) Effectiveness of extension strategies. In ‘Agriculture, environment and society: contemporary issues for Australia’. (Eds G Lawrence, F Vanclay, B Furze) pp. 122–140. (Macmillan: South Melbourne)

Guerin L, Guerin T (1994) Constraints to the adoption of innovations in agricultural research and environmental management: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 549–571.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hochberg Y, Tamhane A (1987) ‘Multiple comparison procedures.’ (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York)

Kahn L, Heard B, Whalley W (2003) ‘Pasture plants of the slopes and tablelands of NSW: a field guide to the recognition and attributes of 70 plants.’ (University of New England: Armidale, NSW)

Kaine G, Bewsell D, Boland A, Linehan C (2005) Using market research to understand the adoption of irrigation management strategies in the stone and pome fruit industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1181–1187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Klockars A, Sax G (1986) ‘Multiple comparisons.’ (Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA)

Llewellyn R, Lindner R, Pannell D, Powles S (2004) Grain grower perceptions and use of integrated weed management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 993–1001.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Llewellyn R, Pannell D, Lidner R, Powles S (2005) Targeting key perceptions when planning and evaluating extension. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1627–1633.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Marsh S, Pannell D (2000) Agricultural extension policy in Australia. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 44, 605–627.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pannell D (2002) The human dimensions of integrated weed management. In ‘The 13th Australian weeds conference, Perth’. (Eds H Spafford Jacob, J Dodd, JH Moore) pp. 8–15. (Plant Protection Society of WA: Perth)

Pannell D, Marshall G, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1407–1424.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Parsons W, Cuthbertson E (2001) ‘Noxious weeds of Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Preston C (2000) Herbicide mode of action and herbicide resistance. In ‘Australian weed management systems’. (Ed. BM Sindel) p. 219. (R.G. and F.G Richardson: Melbourne)

Preston C, Roush RT, Powles SB (1999) Herbicide resistance in weeds of southern Australia: why are we the worst in the world? In ‘The 12th Australian weeds conference, Hobart’. (Eds AC Bishop, M Boersma, CD Barnes) pp. 454–459. (Tasmanian Weeds Society: Hobart)

Sinden J, Jones R, Hester S, Odom D, Kalish C, Hames R, Cacho O (2004) The economic impact of weeds in Australia. (CRC for Australian Weed Management: Adelaide)

Vanclay F (1992) The social context of farmers’ adoption of environmentally sound farming practices. In ‘Agriculture, environment and society’. (Eds G Lawrence, F Vanclay, B Frank) pp. 94–121. (McMillan Press: Melbourne)

Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 213–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vere D, Jones R, Dowling P, Kemp D (2002) Economic impact of vulpia in temperate pasture systems in south-eastern Australia Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 465–472.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1









1 A copy of the questionnaire can be obtained from the authors upon request.

2 A complete list of weeds can be obtained from the authors upon request.