Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA05221
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 47(1)

An evaluation of the yield and quality of oat–legume and ryegrass–legume mixtures and legume monocultures harvested at three stages of growth for silage

A. G. Kaiser A , B. S. Dear A C and S. G. Morris A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

B Current address: NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: brian.dear@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(1) 25-38 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05221
Submitted: 22 August 2005  Accepted: 30 May 2006   Published: 2 January 2007

Abstract

The effect of harvest time on the dry matter (DM) yield and quality of 10 annual temperate legumes [Trifolium subterraneum, var. brachcalycinum and var. subterraneum L. (subterranean clover), T. michelianum Savi (balansa clover), T. alexandrinum L. (berseem clover), Medicago murex Willd. (murex medic), M. truncatula Gaertn. (barrel medic), T. vesiculosum Savi (arrowleaf clover), Vicia sativa L. (common vetch), V. benghalensis L. (purple vetch), Pisum sativum L. (peas) grown in monoculture or in mixtures with oats (Avena sativa L.)] was examined in a Mediterranean environment in southern New South Wales. Three of the legumes (subterranean clover, berseem and peas) were also grown in mixtures with ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.). The forages were sown on 29 May and harvested at three times (2 October, 23 October and 6 November), corresponding to the boot, anthesis and dough stage of the cereal oat variety, Kalgan. Peas were the highest yielding of the legume monocultures at each of the three harvest times (6.9, 11.6, 12.3 t DM/ha), followed by purple vetch (6.2, 9.9, 8.7 t DM/ha). Of the small-seeded pasture legumes, berseem, murex and arrowleaf clover were the highest yielding at the second harvest (7.5–8.8 t DM/ha) when most reached their peak biomass. The inclusion of oats with the legumes increased total DM yield at the first, second and third harvests by 10–54, 7–99 and 3–102%, respectively. Oat monocultures were high yielding (up to 17.7 t DM/ha), but had low N contents (6.3–12.5 g N/kg DM). Oat–legume forage mixtures had nitrogen (N) contents of 7–15 g N/kg compared with 17–40 g N/kg in the legume monocultures. The N content and digestibility of most species and mixtures decreased as harvest time was delayed, whereas total DM peaked at the second harvest for all species except Cooba oats. The legume content of the mixtures was negatively correlated with total DM yield, DM content and water soluble carbohydrates, but positively correlated with N content, in vitro digestibility and buffering capacity. The digestibility of oats decreased more rapidly than the legumes with advancing maturity, and it would need to be harvested at the boot stage to produce a silage of sufficiently high metabolisable energy for the production feeding of cattle. A later harvest at anthesis when yield is higher would produce a silage of sufficient quality for production feeding from an oat–large seeded legume mixture with a legume content of 0.50. The oats and ryegrass had high water soluble carbohydrate and low to medium buffering capacity and would, therefore, be expected to produce well-preserved silages. The legume monocultures had low water soluble carbohydrate contents and high buffering capacity values and there would be a high risk of a poor silage fermentation in these forages without field wilting or the use of a silage additive.


Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Meat and Livestock Australia and NSW Department of Primary Industries. We thank Mr J. Piltz, Mr M. Audist, Ms L. Cavanah and the late Mr D. Conlan for technical assistance.


References


Australian Bureau Statistics (2004) Agricultural commodities. Catalogue no. 7121.0 (2003–2004). Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Bergen WG, Byrem TM, Grant AL (1991) Ensiling characteristics of whole-crop small grains harvested at milk and dough stages. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1766–1774.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Cochrane MJ, Radcliffe JC (1977) Changes in digestibility, crude protein and yield of maturing wheat, oat and barley cultivars. Agricultural Record 4, 50–51. open url image1

Corbett JL, Hough GM, de Salis JJF (1980) Nutritional values of hays and buyer preferences. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 265–268. open url image1

Cornish PS, Murray GM (1989) Low rainfall rarely limits wheat yields in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29, 77–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Corrall AJ, Heard AJ, Fenlon JS, Terry CP, Lewis GC (1977) Whole crop forages. Relationship between stage of growth, yield and forage quality in small-grain cereals and maize. Technical report no. 22. Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, UK.

Dear BS, Sandral GA, Peoples MB, Wilson BCD, Taylor JN, Rodham CA (2003) Growth, seed set and nitrogen fixation of 28 annual legume species on 3 Vertosol soils in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1101–1115.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Demarquilly C, Jarrige R (1974) The comparative nutritive value of grasses and legumes. Presentation at 5th General Meeting European Grassland Federation 1973. Vaxtodling 28, 33–41. open url image1

Eagles HA, Lewis TD, Holland RM, Haslemore RM (1979) Quality and quantity from winter oats in the Manawatu. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 7, 337–341. open url image1

Fulkerson WJ, Donaghy DJ (2001) Plant soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence – key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kaiser AG, Blackwood IF (2004) Feeding silage to beef cattle. In ‘Successful silage’. (Eds AG Kaiser, JW Piltz, HM Burns, NW Griffiths) pp. 359–390. (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Dairy Australia: Orange, NSW)

Kaiser AG, Curll ML (1987) Improving the efficiency of forage conservation from pastures. In ‘Temperate pastures: their production, use and management’. (Eds JL Wheeler, CJ Pearson, GE Robards) pp. 397–411. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Kaiser AG, Piltz JW, Blackwood IF, Griffiths NW, Burns HM (2005) Silage – a strategy for converting more forage to beef. In ‘Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Association national conference’. pp. 23–28. (Beef Improvement Association of Australia: Yendon, Vic.)

Martiniello P (1999) Effects of irrigation and harvest management on dry matter yield and seed yield of annual clovers grown in pure stand and in mixtures with graminaceous species in mediterranean environment. Grass and Forage Science 54, 52–61.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mason WK, Pritchard KE (1987) Intercropping in a temperate environment for irrigated fodder production. Field Crops Research 16, 243–253.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McAndrews GM, Franke K, Moore K, George R (2004) Forage yield and nutritive value of oat interseeded with berseem clover and sweetclover. In ‘Crop management.’ pp. 1–8. (Plant Management Network: St Paul, MN)

McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJ (1991) ‘The biochemistry of silage.’ (Chalcombe Publications: Marlow, UK)

Moreira N (1989) The effect of seed rate and N fertilizer on the yield and nutritive value of oat–vetch mixtures. Journal Agricultural Science, Cambridge 112, 56–66. open url image1

Munzer M (1993) Herbage yields of barley and Hungarian vetch or hairy vetch at different seeding rates. FAO Regional Office for Europe, REUR Technical Series 28. pp. 56–61.

Northcote KH (1979) ‘A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils.’ 4th edn. (Rellim Technical Publications: Glenside, SA)

Piltz JW, Kaiser AG (2004) Principles of silage preservation. In ‘Successful silage’. (Eds AG Kaiser, JW Piltz, HM Burns, NW Griffiths) pp. 25–56. (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Dairy Australia: Orange, NSW)

Playne MJ, McDonald P (1966) The buffering constituents of herbage and silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 17, 264–268.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Ross SM, King JR, O’Donovan JT, Izaurralde RC (2003) Seeding rate effects in oat–berseem clover intercrops. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 769–778. open url image1

Ross SM, King JR, O’Donovan JT, Spaner D (2004) Intercropping berseem clover with barley and oat cultivars for forage. Agronomy Journal 96, 1719–1729. open url image1

Ryan FE (1956) Oats and vetches for hay and silage. Journal of Agriculture of Western Australia 5, 657–659. open url image1

Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage corps. Journal of the British Grasslands Society 18, 104–111. open url image1

Wassermann VD, Heyns G, Kruger AJ (1984) Growth and production of Vicia dasycarpa Ten., cv. Namoi, as influenced by an oat support crop and nitrogen fertilizer. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 1, 79–82. open url image1

Weinberg ZG, Ashbell G, Azrieli A, Brukental I (1993) Ensiling peas, ryegrass and wheat with additives of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and cell wall degrading enzymes. Grass and Forage Science 48, 70–78.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wiersma DW, Hoffman PC, Mlynarek MJ (1999) Companion crops for legume establishment: forage yield, quality, and establishment success. Journal of Production Agriculture 12, 116–122. open url image1