Benefits of treating a sandy soil with a crosslinked-type polyacrylamide
S. SivapalanSchool of Urban Development, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. Email: s.sivapalan@qut.edu.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(4) 579-584 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04026
Submitted: 22 February 2004 Accepted: 26 October 2004 Published: 20 April 2006
Abstract
The productivity of sandy soils is mostly limited by their low water-holding capacity and excessive deep percolation losses, which reduce the efficiency of water and fertiliser use by plants. The effect of a crosslinked-type polyacrylamide, ALCOSORB 400, on water-holding capacity of a sandy soil, siliceous sands, was studied under the laboratory and glasshouse conditions. Water-holding capacity of the soil exposed to 0.01 MPa increased by 23 and 95% by adding 0.03 and 0.07% of polyacrylamide to the soil, respectively. This indicated that the soil treated with polyacrylamide was able to store more water than untreated soil, thereby reducing the potential losses due to deep percolation in sandy soils. However, the polyacrylamide in the treated soil did not significantly increase the quantity of water released from the soil by increasing the pressure from 0.01 to 1.5 MPa. The results from the first glasshouse experiment demonstrated that the excess amount of water stored in the soil by polyacrylamide was available to plants and resulted in higher water use and grain production. Consequently, there was a 12 and 18 fold increase in water use efficiency of soybean plants grown in soils treated with 0.03 and 0.07% polyacrylamide, respectively. The results from the second glasshouse experiment demonstrated that increasing amounts of polyacrylamides in a sandy soil can extend the irrigation interval without any adverse effect on the grain yield of soybeans.
Additional keywords: irrigation interval, plant water use efficiency, soil water-holding capacity.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from Charles Sturt University through the Faculty Seed Grant scheme is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Ciba Speciality Chemicals Pty Ltd for providing polyacrylamide samples. The use of trade names in this paper does not imply their endorsement to the exclusion of other similar and suitable products.
Baasiri M,
Ryan J,
Mucheik M, Harik SN
(1986) Soil application of a hydrophilic conditioner in relation to moisture, irrigation frequency and crop growth. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 17, 573–589.
Johnson MS
(1984a) Effect of soluble salts on water absorption by gel-forming soil conditioners. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35, 1063–1066.
Johnson MS
(1984b) The effects of gel-forming polyacrylamides on moisture storage in sandy soils. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35, 1196–1200.
Johnson MS, Veltkamp CJ
(1985) Structure and functioning of water-storing agricultural polyacrylamides. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 789–793.
Silberbush M,
Adar E, De-Malach Y
(1993a) Use of an hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunes. I. Corn irrigated by trickling. Agricultural Water Management 23, 303–313.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Silberbush M,
Adar E, De-Malach Y
(1993b) Use of an hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunes. II. Cabbage irrigated by sprinkling with different water salinities. Agricultural Water Management 23, 315–327.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sojka RE, Lentz RD
(1994) Time for yet another look at soil conditioners. Soil Science 158, 233–234.
Taylor KC, Halfacre RG
(1986) The effect of hydrophilic polymer on media water retention and nutrient availability to Ligustrum lucidum. HortScience 21, 1159–1161.
